summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorCarl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>2009-01-16 03:03:40 +0000
committerCarl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net>2009-01-16 03:03:40 +0000
commit1d72e10bb4475f30423f7937fcdfc7940ba3fb5c (patch)
treec5efc967dcd4e7afd582b712d207572a7302f85f
parentabcddcd392bbe5e36e53ef8611df892812e2a367 (diff)
downloadcoreboot-1d72e10bb4475f30423f7937fcdfc7940ba3fb5c.tar.xz
Refactor K8 rev F DDR2 CL timing retrieval.
This will allow usage of compatible DIMMS in a dual channel setup instead of requiring the DIMMS to be identical. Code impact is minimal because a large chunk of code has been moved into a separate function with almost no changes. Tested, yields identical results and identical logs. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se> git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3866 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
-rw-r--r--src/northbridge/amd/amdk8/raminit_f.c176
1 files changed, 96 insertions, 80 deletions
diff --git a/src/northbridge/amd/amdk8/raminit_f.c b/src/northbridge/amd/amdk8/raminit_f.c
index 196209525b..8bfb08fa25 100644
--- a/src/northbridge/amd/amdk8/raminit_f.c
+++ b/src/northbridge/amd/amdk8/raminit_f.c
@@ -1702,6 +1702,96 @@ static unsigned convert_to_linear(unsigned value)
return value;
}
+static const uint8_t latency_indicies[] = { 25, 23, 9 };
+
+int find_optimum_spd_latency(u32 spd_device, unsigned *min_latency, unsigned *min_cycle_time)
+{
+ int new_cycle_time, new_latency;
+ int index;
+ int latencies;
+ int latency;
+
+ /* First find the supported CAS latencies
+ * Byte 18 for DDR SDRAM is interpreted:
+ * bit 3 == CAS Latency = 3
+ * bit 4 == CAS Latency = 4
+ * bit 5 == CAS Latency = 5
+ * bit 6 == CAS Latency = 6
+ */
+ new_cycle_time = 0x500;
+ new_latency = 6;
+
+ latencies = spd_read_byte(spd_device, SPD_CAS_LAT);
+ if (latencies <= 0)
+ return 1;
+
+ printk_raminit("\tlatencies: %08x\n", latencies);
+ /* Compute the lowest cas latency which can be expressed in this
+ * particular SPD EEPROM. You can store at most settings for 3
+ * contiguous CAS latencies, so by taking the highest CAS
+ * latency maked as supported in the SPD and subtracting 2 you
+ * get the lowest expressable CAS latency. That latency is not
+ * necessarily supported, but a (maybe invalid) entry exists
+ * for it.
+ */
+ latency = log2(latencies) - 2;
+
+ /* Loop through and find a fast clock with a low latency */
+ for (index = 0; index < 3; index++, latency++) {
+ int value;
+ if ((latency < 3) || (latency > 6) ||
+ (!(latencies & (1 << latency)))) {
+ continue;
+ }
+ value = spd_read_byte(spd_device, latency_indicies[index]);
+ if (value < 0) {
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ printk_raminit("\tindex: %08x\n", index);
+ printk_raminit("\t\tlatency: %08x\n", latency);
+ printk_raminit("\t\tvalue1: %08x\n", value);
+
+ value = convert_to_linear(value);
+
+ printk_raminit("\t\tvalue2: %08x\n", value);
+
+ /* Only increase the latency if we decrease the clock */
+ if (value >= *min_cycle_time ) {
+ if (value < new_cycle_time) {
+ new_cycle_time = value;
+ new_latency = latency;
+ } else if (value == new_cycle_time) {
+ if (new_latency > latency) {
+ new_latency = latency;
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ printk_raminit("\t\tnew_cycle_time: %08x\n", new_cycle_time);
+ printk_raminit("\t\tnew_latency: %08x\n", new_latency);
+
+ }
+
+ if (new_latency > 6){
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ /* Does min_latency need to be increased? */
+ if (new_cycle_time > *min_cycle_time) {
+ *min_cycle_time = new_cycle_time;
+ }
+
+ /* Does min_cycle_time need to be increased? */
+ if (new_latency > *min_latency) {
+ *min_latency = new_latency;
+ }
+
+ printk_raminit("2 min_cycle_time: %08x\n", *min_cycle_time);
+ printk_raminit("2 min_latency: %08x\n", *min_latency);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static struct spd_set_memclk_result spd_set_memclk(const struct mem_controller *ctrl, struct mem_info *meminfo)
{
/* Compute the minimum cycle time for these dimms */
@@ -1710,8 +1800,6 @@ static struct spd_set_memclk_result spd_set_memclk(const struct mem_controller *
int i;
uint32_t value;
- static const uint8_t latency_indicies[] = { 25, 23, 9 };
-
static const uint16_t min_cycle_times[] = { // use full speed to compare
[NBCAP_MEMCLK_NOLIMIT] = 0x250, /*2.5ns */
[NBCAP_MEMCLK_333MHZ] = 0x300, /* 3.0ns */
@@ -1735,10 +1823,6 @@ static struct spd_set_memclk_result spd_set_memclk(const struct mem_controller *
* by both the memory controller and the dimms.
*/
for (i = 0; i < DIMM_SOCKETS; i++) {
- int new_cycle_time, new_latency;
- int index;
- int latencies;
- int latency;
u32 spd_device = ctrl->channel0[i];
printk_raminit("1.1 dimm_mask: %08x\n", meminfo->dimm_mask);
@@ -1750,83 +1834,15 @@ static struct spd_set_memclk_result spd_set_memclk(const struct mem_controller *
}
}
- /* First find the supported CAS latencies
- * Byte 18 for DDR SDRAM is interpreted:
- * bit 3 == CAS Latency = 3
- * bit 4 == CAS Latency = 4
- * bit 5 == CAS Latency = 5
- * bit 6 == CAS Latency = 6
- */
- new_cycle_time = 0x500;
- new_latency = 6;
-
- latencies = spd_read_byte(spd_device, SPD_CAS_LAT);
- if (latencies <= 0) continue;
-
printk_raminit("i: %08x\n",i);
- printk_raminit("\tlatencies: %08x\n", latencies);
- /* Compute the lowest cas latency which can be expressed in this
- * particular SPD EEPROM. You can store at most settings for 3
- * contiguous CAS latencies, so by taking the highest CAS
- * latency maked as supported in the SPD and subtracting 2 you
- * get the lowest expressable CAS latency. That latency is not
- * necessarily supported, but a (maybe invalid) entry exists
- * for it.
- */
- latency = log2(latencies) - 2;
-
- /* Loop through and find a fast clock with a low latency */
- for (index = 0; index < 3; index++, latency++) {
- int value;
- if ((latency < 3) || (latency > 6) ||
- (!(latencies & (1 << latency)))) {
- continue;
- }
- value = spd_read_byte(spd_device, latency_indicies[index]);
- if (value < 0) {
- goto hw_error;
- }
-
- printk_raminit("\tindex: %08x\n", index);
- printk_raminit("\t\tlatency: %08x\n", latency);
- printk_raminit("\t\tvalue1: %08x\n", value);
-
- value = convert_to_linear(value);
- printk_raminit("\t\tvalue2: %08x\n", value);
-
- /* Only increase the latency if we decrease the clock */
- if (value >= min_cycle_time ) {
- if (value < new_cycle_time) {
- new_cycle_time = value;
- new_latency = latency;
- } else if (value == new_cycle_time) {
- if (new_latency > latency) {
- new_latency = latency;
- }
- }
- }
- printk_raminit("\t\tnew_cycle_time: %08x\n", new_cycle_time);
- printk_raminit("\t\tnew_latency: %08x\n", new_latency);
-
- }
-
- if (new_latency > 6){
+ switch (find_optimum_spd_latency(spd_device, &min_latency, &min_cycle_time)) {
+ case -1:
+ goto hw_error;
+ break;
+ case 1:
continue;
- }
-
- /* Does min_latency need to be increased? */
- if (new_cycle_time > min_cycle_time) {
- min_cycle_time = new_cycle_time;
- }
-
- /* Does min_cycle_time need to be increased? */
- if (new_latency > min_latency) {
- min_latency = new_latency;
- }
-
- printk_raminit("2 min_cycle_time: %08x\n", min_cycle_time);
- printk_raminit("2 min_latency: %08x\n", min_latency);
+ }
}
/* Make a second pass through the dimms and disable
* any that cannot support the selected memclk and cas latency.