summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2021-01-22mb/amd/majolica: Add PSP support for board majolicaZheng Bao
Change-Id: Ia2470a7297c7003c7975c7d9b977f2f97174efea Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao <fishbaozi@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48529 Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-22mb/google/guybrush: Set the ROMSIZE as 16MZheng Bao
Change-Id: Iec8b40bd89c25cd2193aff8af45d0a09b07ad6a3 Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao <fishbaozi@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49797 Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-22ec/google/chromeec: Provide EC access for Retimer firmware updateJohn Zhao
Kernel needs to access EC RFWU entry in order to retrieve from EC about port and mux info and set EC operations like modes change. This change provides EC RFWU path and update for Retimer driver usage. BUG=b:162528867 TEST=Booted to kernel and verified EC RFWU path from ACPI SSDT table. Signed-off-by: John Zhao <john.zhao@intel.com> Change-Id: I3817d93cfdeedf15825dab6c537b151fd063338b Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49257 Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-22ec/google/chromeec: Add RFWU into EC RAM for Retimer firmware updateJohn Zhao
The RFWU byte is defined as Bits[3:0] for port number and Bits[7:4] for operations. The supported operations are: RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_PORT_INFO 0 RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_PD_SUSPEND 1 RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_PD_RESUME 2 RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_GET_MUX 3 RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_SET_USB 4 RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_SET_SAFE 5 RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_SET_TBT 6 RETIMER_FW_UPDATE_DISCONNECT 7 BUG=b:162528867 TEST=Booted to kernel and verified RFWU entry from ACPI DSDT ERAM field. Signed-off-by: John Zhao <john.zhao@intel.com> Change-Id: I1ba04c6357b6fd0cc33ffce33e7e430539bace79 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49051 Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-22drivers/intel/usb4: Enable retimer FW upgrade mux interactionBrandon Breitenstein
In order to update the BB retimers for usb4/tbt they need to be turned on and into TBT mode. Expand the current DSM to allow for the use of an EC RAM byte RFWU to get the current state of each port and whether or not it has a retimer. It also allows Kernel to issue state transitions for the retimer to be put into TBT mode for firmware update. BUG=b:162528867 TEST=Along with work in progress kernel and EC patches, the Retimer firmware update is verified under device attached and no device attached scenarios. Change-Id: I768cfb56790049c231173b0ea0f8e08fe6b64b93 Signed-off-by: Brandon Breitenstein <brandon.breitenstein@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48630 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
2021-01-22sconfig: Handle smbios_slot_desc in overridetreeFrans Hendriks
SMBIOS slot information in overrridetree is not overriden if device already exist in devicetree. Add support to handle this information from override. BUG= N/A TEST= Verify generated static.c on Intel Coffee Lake CRB Change-Id: I532436aee1d71b79171463124f7b205c145d5b05 Signed-off-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49738 Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-22mb/prodrive/hermes: Fix 30 second boot delayPatrick Rudolph
The PMC doesn't response any more due to invalid CNVi GPIO configuration. This caused a 30 second boot delay in FSP-S. Use the same values as FSP-S does. Always disable external I2S BT audio and use NF3 for pad GPP_D5 and GPP_D6. Tested on Prodrive hermes: No boot delay can be observed any more. Change-Id: I6f4a954786ec21512b0dce908d333952e96de048 Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49678 Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com> Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-22mb/google/octopus: Garfour override VBT selectionTony Huang
Disable DRRS in VBT to solve panel flick issue SKU ID 49/51 will use vbt_garfour.bin 50/52 will use vbt_garfour_hdmi.bin BUG=b:177783330 BRANCH=octopus TEST=emerge-octopus coreboot chromeos-bootimage check /run/debug/i915_drrs_status shows DRRS supported NO. Cq-Depend: chrome-internal:3534569 Change-Id: I5ebb66ec043a6b409dd5abbc31da417f50dbad5c Signed-off-by: Tony Huang <tony-huang@quanta.corp-partner.google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49635 Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-22mb/google/nightfury: Update RAM IDs usageSeunghwan Kim
Add support LP_16G_2133 SPD for nightfury. BUG=None BRANCH=firmware-hatch-12672.B TEST=emerge-hatch coreboot Change-Id: I3709431d8ecb600e25909f456eb0c95db3a3cde2 Signed-off-by: Seunghwan Kim <sh_.kim@samsung.corp-partner.google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49735 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
2021-01-22types.h: Add a helper macro BITS_PER_BYTEFurquan Shaikh
This change adds a helper macro `BITS_PER_BYTE` so that it doesn't have to be defined in multiple places. Change-Id: Idc344047a5660791eaeb1ce8012910c11f6010ba Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49736 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: EricR Lai <ericr_lai@compal.corp-partner.google.com> Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
2021-01-22soc/intel/alderlake: Adding Kconfig for ADL_M PCHVarshit Pandya
1. Add SOC_INTEL_ALDERLAKE_PCH_M option in Kconfig 2. Select number of I/O based on PCH Signed-off-by: Varshit Pandya <varshit.b.pandya@intel.com> Change-Id: I38783595e4b85abf5b3bec234ba01667bd9ba754 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49630 Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-22soc/intel/commmon: Include Alder Lake device IDsVarshit Pandya
Add Alder Lake M specific CPU, System AGent, PCH (Alder Point aka ADP), IGD device IDs. Document Number: 619501, 626817 Signed-off-by: Varshit Pandya <varshit.b.pandya@intel.com> Change-Id: Ib13fe229f9e65eae8967aa20e28e29ac5c319265 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49629 Reviewed-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-22mb/google/volteer/var/elemi: Update dptf parametersWisley Chen
Update DPTF setting from thermal team. BUG=b:177635236 BRANCH=volteer TEST=emerge-volteer coreboot chromeos-bootimage, and verified by thermal team. Change-Id: I87256b5c210ef12c09ef6dd948d80f406ae0500b Signed-off-by: Wisley Chen <wisley.chen@quantatw.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49682 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Sumeet R Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
2021-01-22soc/mediatek/mt8192: pmic: Set efuses manuallyHsin-Hsiung Wang
Some efuse settings would not be applied automatically, so we need set the settings manually. The low power consumption would not be optimal without correct efuse settings. BUG=b:172636735 BRANCH=none TEST=see 'pmic_efuse_setting: Set efuses in 11 msecs' Signed-off-by: Hsin-Hsiung Wang <hsin-hsiung.wang@mediatek.com> Change-Id: Ideb862c3cb0f1fee183804aed74fcf141bf1f5df Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49006 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
2021-01-22mb/google/volteer/variants/eldrid: Configure USB2 port for Type-CNick Chen
1. USB2 ports 3 and 8 assigned to Type-C connector 2. USB2 port 3 keep USB2_PORT_SHORT setting and add .type_c flag BUG=b:177481076 TEST=tested on eldrid Signed-off-by: Nick Chen <nick_xr_chen@wistron.corp-partner.google.com> Change-Id: I42a39318a151bdf1f5aeb84bb1992be128cb4a4d Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49452 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
2021-01-22soc/mediatek/mt8183: Fix pq module size configYu-Ping Wu
For pq module size registers such as DISP_AAL_SIZE, the high bits should be HSIZE, while low bits should be VSIZE. Fix the incorrect settings for these registers where width and height are reversed. According to MediaTek, there is no practical impact on mt8183 devices, but it's still nice to get this fixed to avoid future confusion. BUG=b:171167210 TEST=none BRANCH=kukui Change-Id: I4b6aedf9a3ca133fcbe9cb88b99a13d228233e24 Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46626 Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-22mb/emulation/qemu-q35: Account for TSEGArthur Heymans
TSEG is located below TOLUD. The size is configured in ESMRAMC but can also be configured with "-global mch.extended-tseg-mbytes=5" command line argument. Note that the size in ESMRAMC needs to be 'invalid' (3) for this to take action. coreboot will leave TSEG at the default 1MiB. Note that even if TSEG does not end up being used, it is likely a good idea to not put anything there as if SMM gets locked down by something else it will suddenly be inaccessible. Change-Id: I5fd82a42d6602f1369bb3c69556c46f537542705 Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48236 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2021-01-22cpu/intel/haswell: Enable timed MWAIT if supportedAngel Pons
Broadwell code unconditionally enables timed MWAIT, but not all Haswell steppings support it. In preparation for merging Haswell and Broadwell, also enable timed MWAIT on Haswell code, but only if it is supported. Change-Id: I1d11d62f1801d65ae4d5623994fd55fd35e8f34a Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46916 Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-22soc/amd/common/block/smbus: always return SMBus MMIO in get_sm_mmioFelix Held
The old code was broken and register 0x90 didn't even exist any more in the config space of the SMBus PCI device, so just always return the MMIO base address of the SMBus controller. As far as I've seen, no board in tree uses this functionality at the moment. Change-Id: Ib80d5c928da6022427afb8ccc969fb2aac953c2d Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de> Reported-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49121 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2021-01-22mb/getac/p470/acpi: Convert 'battery.asl' to ASL 2.0 syntaxElyes HAOUAS
IASL optimizes the code differently, which changes the binary. However, the generated `build/dsdt.dsl` remains identical. Change-Id: Ifcc8bf4022838056bf1fff853eb2027af684064e Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45554 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-22soc/intel/baytrail,broadwell: Refactor acpi_wake_source()Kyösti Mälkki
Change-Id: I5c277a4b8536fd79bda040d4ada9b0c454399b09 Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49356 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-22mb/google/kukui: Enable MT8183_DRAM_EMCP for katsuSunway
The katsu project will be using eMCP board design. BUG=b:176271935 TEST=Boots on chromebook katsu successfully. BRANCH=kukui Signed-off-by: Sunway <lisunwei@huaqin.corp-partner.google.com> Change-Id: I733a9a79e2ea6501e26bf79bfce2b1934a295342 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48893 Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com> Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-22Makefile.inc: Avoid --emit-relocs on RISC-VJulius Werner
There seems to be a bug[1] in the GNU linker for the RISC-V architecture triggered by symbols that are more than 2GB offset from the program counter. My next patch is introducing symbols like that and stuck on this problem. The code path that runs into the issue is only taken when passing the --emit-relocs flag, which is really only needed for building rmodules. Since RISC-V platforms don't use any rmodules at the moment, let's disable the flag on RISC-V until the issue can be fixed in the toolchain. [1]: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27180 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Change-Id: I784a506034325c0ba937589416acaafbf80080e2 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49449 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21soc/amd/cezanne: include LAPIC code and set MAX_CPUS to 16Felix Held
Change-Id: I97c73324900a0677165afa3f5b182a336d534968 Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49730 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
2021-01-21mb/siemens/chili: do UART pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to a bootblock gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Change-Id: Iad40b6315a29e7aea612a3e1a169372d296d1d6c Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49443 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/up/squared: do UART pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: I357099f797be178543a9e6637335cd0a68633071 Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49441 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/intel/kblrvp: do UART pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to the early gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: I8b30eb5d70c34ae3e2ed24ab52dd1357a54c5ae7 Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49439 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/intel/minnow3: do UART pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: I0b956427a9cec56d06b03f7f05138f75137b4ea3 Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49437 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/intel/leafhill: do UART pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: Ibc727302109456eb1d86652c947ce85b3a64c5b2 Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49436 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/intel/glkrvp: do UART pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: I80369ab70d5510cb4f388f3029119e7148361af4 Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49435 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/intel/apollolake_rvp: do UART pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to a early UART gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: Id6b55d7f3d3fbfc5b55497708f24006614760d03 Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49434 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/intel/tglrvp: do UART pad config at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: I130fd26944169430a84c3609432b1b5283581c99 Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49432 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/intel/jasperlake_rvp: do UART pad config at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: Ie3878b47b8e20c51b928a38df9ccedf2d50d478e Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49431 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/intel/icelake_rvp: do UART pad config at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: Ib19a4f64eaf25bf2eb47ee60748a68538fc0729a Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49430 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/google/reef: do UART pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: I279956f30cbb6fb031cdfe6aaa09b644b6b7d3e7 Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49427 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/intel/minnow3: drop unneeded call to lpc_configure_padsMichael Niewöhner
The LPC/eSPI pad configuration is already done at board-level. Thus, drop redundant configuration by dropping the call to lpc_configure_pads. Change-Id: Ib9e62bf19e6f1fbe32a340e4802c13504a0d6def Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49417 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/intel/leafhill: do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms by adding an appropriate early gpio table in the bootblock. The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410. Change-Id: Ie1e53e72c65fdcfe4be2e01134873aa7858c28ff Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49416 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/intel/glkrvp: do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms. This is done by adding one missing pad to the early gpio table and dropping the call to the soc function. The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410. Change-Id: I210633d4520fcfab59f68268bd7991557433ce38 Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49415 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/up/squared: do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms by adding an appropriate early gpio table in the bootblock. The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410. Change-Id: If0693a4419c58dde3c4536698940f03c30304b9d Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49414 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/google/reef: do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms. This is done by adding missing pads to the bootblock gpio table. The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410. Change-Id: I95993b1bd4f1fd8b4ac7b21fb89ec4d196b0240a Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49412 Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/google/hatch: do UART pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: I62ffbe36bd7b7675aa0f41a8c6e9214d04ad4ae5 Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49428 Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/google/glados: do UART pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to the early gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: I6fedcebea3bb31d992bac1e3b21382fea93a8b82 Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49429 Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/google/octopus: do UART pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: Ieeb738afd54e77ee853ee109009f611411aa0d4a Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49426 Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/google/dedede: do UART pad config at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus, add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829. Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: I5482f44b361925b7d2dbcbf1065c1be035c68b0b Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49424 Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/google/drallion: do early pad configuration in early bootstageMichael Niewöhner
Do early pad configuration in early bootblock before console init, to make the console work as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way (e.g. breaking overrides). Change-Id: I7dcf88d61c305f0598a0a79f8cfa46ef5009564b Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49419 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
2021-01-21mb/google/octopus: do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-levelMichael Niewöhner
Do LPC/eSPI pad configuration at board-level to match other platforms by adding an appropriate early gpio table in the bootblock. The soc code gets dropped in CB:49410. Change-Id: Ie33bae481f430a1c4410a0a4e2b2a34a3e78adaa Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49411 Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21cpu/intel/haswell: Clean up CPUID definitionsAngel Pons
The `mobile` suffix is misleading, since desktop CPUs share the same CPUIDs. Remove unused stepping IDs and add the full CPUIDs instead. Finally, add Broadwell CPUIDs in preparation for merging CPU code. Note that steppings for Haswell in various comments are incorrect. Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Asrock B85M Pro4 remains identical. Change-Id: I19e56b8826b1514550ae95e6363b0df2d08e3cb7 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46915 Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21cpu/intel/haswell: Add s0ix supportAngel Pons
Backport Broadwell's s0ix support to Haswell in preparation to unify both platforms' CPU code. Note that only ULT variants support s0ix. This option is currently unused, but will be put to use in subsequent commits, when switching Broadwell mainboards to use Haswell's CPU code. Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Asrock B85M Pro4 remains identical. Change-Id: I91c6f937c09c9254a6f698f3a6fb6366364e3b2b Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46924 Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21src/drivers/smmstore: Fix SMMSTOREv1 clear commandTim Crawford
The `clear` command for SMMSTORE version 1 does not require a parameter. Change-Id: I992b7ce5962bf7ee62b7e1970ae7aa1b975ef42e Signed-off-by: Tim Crawford <tcrawford@system76.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49724 Reviewed-by: Jeremy Soller <jeremy@system76.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2021-01-21mb/google/volteer/variant/lindar: Enable SA GV settingKevin Chang
Allow MRC training in SA GV. BUG=b:177779469 BRANCH=firmware-volteer-13672.B TEST=Built and booted into OS. Signed-off-by: Kevin Chang <kevin.chang@lcfc.corp-partner.google.com> Change-Id: Idc9f634135b489450f53f8cd28d80649309d0f70 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49636 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2025-01-17 19:42:50 +0000