coreboot - Some coreboot project code with my work

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2013-11-25	Make ssize_t an actual ssize_t	Stefan Reinauer
	In the process of getting rid of compiler includes during in coreboot and libpayload, we defined size_t and ssize_t ourselves, using a GCC macro for size_t: __SIZE_TYPE__. Unfortunately, there is no __SSIZE_TYPE__, so we temporarily redefine unsigned to signed to make __SIZE_TYPE__ __SSIZE_TYPE__. Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Change-Id: I4cf4eb0fdaa4db64277c2585fe2c1bdc0acdf02b Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/49947 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4156 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-04-18	libpayload: Don't sneak in compiler includes	Stefan Reinauer
	The way we got to include the compiler includes was kind of whacky. Instead of mixing in potentially problematic headers, make libpayload self-contained by adding some missing header files. Also clean up conflicting definitions of size_t throughout the tree. Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Change-Id: I0ad1194de1a00b7133c5477c00eb167d63a2ee85 Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/47608 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3058 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>