| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change-Id: Ic09c04cfa18408c61d7e99ea29bccc23acbd7144
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43956
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
When emitting a fan's _FPS (Fan Performance States) table, the revision
field was missing. According to ACPI spec 6.3, the current revision is
zero, so add that Package entry before the others.
BUG=b:149722146
TEST=verified first element of \_SB.DPTF.TFN1._FPS is 0
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Change-Id: If16d4751f1d924807f5087d93b348e58d5265197
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43978
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Sumeet R Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
In the initial DPTF refactor, the scope of the TCPU device was
incorrectly set as \_SB, instead of \_SB.PCI0. However, because of the
way that the acpi_inject_dsdt() callback currently works (it injects
contents before the dsdt.aml file), the Scope where the TCPU
device lives (\_SB.PCI0) doesn't exist yet. Therefore, to avoid playing
games with *when* things are defined in the DSDT, switch to defining all
of the DPTF devices in the SSDT.
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ia4922b4dc6544d79d44d39e6ad18c6ab9fee0fd7
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43529
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
\_SB.DPTF.IDSP adverties to the DPTF daemon which policies the
implementation supports. Added a new acpigen function to figure out
which policies are used, and fills out IDSP appropriately.
Change-Id: Idf67a23bf38de4481c02f98ffb27afb8ca2d1b7b
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/42081
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
DPTF has several options on how to control the fan (fine-grained speed
control, minimum speed change in percentage points, and whether or not
the DPTF device should notify the Fan if it detects low speed).
Individual TSRs can also set GTSH, which is the amount of hysteresis
inherent in the measurement, either from circuitry (if analog), or in
firmware (if digital).
BUG=b:143539650
TEST=compiles
Change-Id: I42d789d877da28c163e394d7de5fb1ff339264eb
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41891
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
This change adds support for emitting the PPCC table, which describes
the ranges available as knobs for DPTF to tune. It can support min/max
power, min/max time window for averaging, and the minimum adjustment size
(granularity or step size) of each power limit. The current implementation
only supports PL1 and PL2.
BUG=b:143539650
TEST=compiles
Change-Id: I67e80d661ea5bb79980ef285eca40c9a4b0f1849
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41890
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
This change adds support for generating the _FPS table for the DPTF Fan
object. The table describes different levels of fan activity that may be
applied to the system in order to actively cool it. The information
includes fan speed at a (rough) percentage level, fan speed in RPM,
potential noise level in centibels, and power in mA.
BUG=b:143539650
TEST=compiles
Change-Id: I5591eb527f496d0c4c613352d2a87625d47d9273
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41889
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
This change generates the DPTF TCHG.PPSS table in the SSDT. This table
describes different charging rates which are available to use. DPTF
can pick different rates in order to passively cool (or not) the
system.
BUG=b:143539650
TEST=compiles
Change-Id: I6df6bfbac628fa4e4d313e38b8e6c53fce70a7f2
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
This patch adds support for DPTF Critical Policies, which are consist
of Method definitions only. They are `_CRT` and `_HOT`, which are
defined as temperature thresholds that, when exceeded, will execute a
graceful suspend or a graceful shutdown, respectively.
BUG=b:143539650
TEST=compiles
Change-Id: I711ecdcf17ae8f6e653f33069201da4515ace85e
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41887
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
This patch adds support for emitting the Thermal Relationship Table, as
well as _PSV Methods, which together form the basis for DPTF Passive
Policies.
BUG=b:143539650
TEST=compiles
Change-Id: I82e1c9022999b0a2a733aa6cd9c98a850e6f5408
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41886
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
This change adds support for generating the different pieces of DPTF
Active Policies. This includes the Active Relationship Table, in
addition to _ACx methods.
BUG=b:143539650
TEST=compiles
Change-Id: Iea0ccbd96f88d0f3a8f2c77a7d0f3a284e5ee463
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41885
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Sumeet R Pawnikar <sumeet.r.pawnikar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
