summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/arch/arm64/memset.S
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-05-11treewide: Remove "this file is part of" linesPatrick Georgi
Stefan thinks they don't add value. Command used: sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool) The exceptions are for: - crossgcc (patch file) - gcov (imported from gcc) - elf.h (imported from GNU's libc) - nvramtool (more complicated header) The removed lines are: - fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */") -# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available -/* This file is part of coreboot */ -# This file is part of msrtool. -/* This file is part of msrtool. */ - * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in -/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */ - * This file is part of the coreboot project. - /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */ -# This file is part of the coreboot project. -# This file is part of the coreboot project. -## This file is part of the coreboot project. --- This file is part of the coreboot project. -/* This file is part of the coreboot project */ -/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */ -;## This file is part of the coreboot project. -# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the - * This file is part of the coreinfo project. -## This file is part of the coreinfo project. - * This file is part of the depthcharge project. -/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */ -/* This file is part of the ectool project. */ - * This file is part of the GNU C Library. - * This file is part of the libpayload project. -## This file is part of the libpayload project. -/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */ -## This file is part of the superiotool project. -/* This file is part of the superiotool project */ -/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */ Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194 Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-03-06src/arch/arm64: Convert to SPDX license headerPatrick Georgi
This also drops individual copyright notices, all mentioned authors in that part of the tree are already listed in AUTHORS. Change-Id: Ic5eddc961d015328e5a90994b7963e7af83cddd3 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39279 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2019-08-26AUTHORS: Move src/arch/arm64 copyrights into AUTHORS fileMartin Roth
As discussed on the mailing list and voted upon, the coreboot project is going to move the majority of copyrights out of the headers and into an AUTHORS file. This will happen a bit at a time, as we'll be unifying license headers at the same time. Additional changes in this patch: - Make sure files say that they're part of the coreboot project - Move descriptions below the license header Note that the file include/arch/acpi.h is a fantastic example of why moving to the authors file is needed. Excluding the guard statements, it has 8 lines of copyrights for 3 function declarations. Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org> Change-Id: I334baab2b4311eb1bd9ce3f67f49a68e8b73630c Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34606 Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2015-10-31tree: drop last paragraph of GPL copyright headerPatrick Georgi
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address. Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we imported) looks out for that. This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further editing. Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2015-06-23Revert "arm64: remove assembly code string functions"Furquan Shaikh
This reverts commit 00263d0d8ee23bbe60ea359ea9cb33d551688980 to reintroduce optimized string handling functions. BUG=chrome-os-partner:41185 BRANCH=None TEST=Compiles successfully and boots to kernel prompt on Smaug Change-Id: I47f8d8afa5c9ff3fca67d4d0f393336fef03402b Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: eeb38afea828a2727d815e4fb5762cfdd09a2b3a Original-Change-Id: Id053cbcea8b5e7ae29bdd6bb8b6f5e5011c42b00 Original-Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/275865 Original-Trybot-Ready: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Original-Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10564 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
2015-03-04arm64: remove assembly code string functionsAaron Durbin
Inconsistent progress was observed running ramstage. It was determined that the hand-coded assembly functions were causing issues. Some of the comments seems suspect about the hardware taking care of alignment. The prudent thing to do is to use the C ones. Optimization can come later after maturity. BUG=chrome-os-partner:29923 BRANCH=None TEST=Built and booted to attempting to payload Original-Change-Id: I4137adf9b36b638ed207e4efd57adaac64c6a6c1 Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/207431 Original-Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 2762e478c6b59dd30c59aa87a922d0f78c00c0c4) Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Change-Id: Id3196b0c2bf41a21db31f999ba437d118875a236 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8587 Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2014-09-23coreboot arm64: Add support for arm64 into coreboot frameworkFurquan Shaikh
Add support for enabling different coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) to have arm64 architecture. Most of the files have been copied over from arm/ or arm64-generic work. Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/197397 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Tested-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 033ba96516805502673ac7404bc97e6ce4e2a934) This patch is essentially a squash of aarch64 changes made by these patches: d955885 coreboot: Rename coreboot_ram stage to ramstage a492761 cbmem console: Locate the preram console with a symbol instead of a sect 96e7f0e aarch64: Enable early icache and migrate SCTLR from EL3 3f854dc aarch64: Pass coreboot table in jmp_to_elf_entry ab3ecaf aarch64/foundation-armv8: Set up RAM area and enter ramstage 25fd2e9 aarch64: Remove CAR definitions from early_variables.h 65bf77d aarch64/foundation-armv8: Enable DYNAMIC_CBMEM 9484873 aarch64: Change default exception level to EL2 7a152c3 aarch64: Fix formatting of exception registers dump 6946464 aarch64: Implement basic exception handling c732a9d aarch64/foundation-armv8: Basic bootblock implementation 3bc412c aarch64: Comment out some parts of code to allow build ab5be71 Add initial aarch64 support The ramstage support is the only portion that has been tested on actual hardware. Bootblock and romstage support may require modifications to run on hardware. Change-Id: Icd59bec55c963a471a50e30972a8092e4c9d2fb2 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6915 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>