| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Since we now have more freedom in the bootblock linking step it no
longer makes sense to use a monolithic bootblock.S. Code segments must
still be included as the order in bootblock.S determines code flow.
However, non-code flow related assembly stubs don't need to be directly
included in bootblock.S
Change-Id: I08e86e92d82bd2138194ed42652f268b0764aa54
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11792
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
The code flow doesn't fall through to walkcbfs, as it does in the rest
of bootblock.S. Instead, walkcbfs is called (albeit via a jmp). The
linker cannot know this when walkcbfs.S is included directly.
When we use a CAR bootblock, we lose several hundred bytes because
walkcbfs is not garbage-collected, yet it isn't used. This problem
is solved by assembling walkcbfs.S separately, and linking it.
Change-Id: Ib3a976db09b9ff270b7677cb4f9db80b0b025e22
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11785
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
The build system was previously determining the flow
and linking scripts bootblock code by the order of files
added to the bootblock_inc bootblock-y variables.Those
files were then concatenated together and built by a myriad of
make rules.
Now bootblock.S and bootblock.ld is added so that bootblock
can be built and linked using the default build rules.
CHIPSET_BOOTBLOCK_INCLUDE is introduced in order to allow the
chipset code to place include files in the path of the bootblock
program -- a replacement for the chipset_bootblock_inc
make variable.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built vortex, rambi, and some asus boards.
Change-Id: Ida4571cbe6eed65e77ade98b8d9ad056353c53f9
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11495
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
