summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/cpu/intel/fit
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2016-02-14CPU/intel: Add missing license headersDamien Roth
Add missing license headers to files that have no coreboot header. Change-Id: Iaaa04b5dcbd446a2064ac68d501ae8e860486e36 Signed-off-by: Damien Roth <yves.r.roth@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13289 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
2015-10-08arch/x86/bootblock: Do not include non-code files in bootblock.SAlexandru Gagniuc
Since we now have more freedom in the bootblock linking step it no longer makes sense to use a monolithic bootblock.S. Code segments must still be included as the order in bootblock.S determines code flow. However, non-code flow related assembly stubs don't need to be directly included in bootblock.S Change-Id: I08e86e92d82bd2138194ed42652f268b0764aa54 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11792 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Tested-by: Raptor Engineering Automated Test Stand <noreply@raptorengineeringinc.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2015-10-07x86/bootblock: Use LDFLAGS_bootblock to enable garbage collectionAlexandru Gagniuc
The x86 bootblock linking is a mess. The bootblock is treated in a very special manner, and never received the update to link-time garbage collection. On newer x86 platforms, the boot media is no longer memory-mapped. That means we need to do a lot more setup in the bootblock. ROMCC is unsuitable for this task, and walkcbfs only works on memory-mapped CBFS. We need to revise the x86 bootflow for this new case. The approach this patch series takes is to perform CAR setup in the bootblock, and load the following stage (either romstage or verstage) from the boot media. This approach is not new, but has been done on our ARM ports for years. Since we will be adding .c files to the bootblock, it is prudent to use link-time garbage collection. This is also consistent to how we do things on other architectures. Unification FTW! Change-Id: I16b78456df56e0053984a9aca9367e2542adfdc9 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11781 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2015-06-08Remove empty lines at end of fileElyes HAOUAS
Used command line to remove empty lines at end of file: find . -type f -exec sed -i -e :a -e '/^\n*$/{$d;N;};/\n$/ba' {} \; Change-Id: I816ac9666b6dbb7c7e47843672f0d5cc499766a3 Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10446 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-03-28build system: normalize linker script file namesPatrick Georgi
We have .lb, .lds, and .ld in the tree. Go for .ld everywhere. This is inspired by the commit listed below, but rewritten to match upstream, and split in smaller pieces to keep intent clear. Change-Id: I3126af608afe4937ec4551a78df5a7824e09b04b Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Based-On-Change-Id: I50af7dacf616e0f8ff4c43f4acc679089ad7022b Based-On-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Based-On-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/219170 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9107 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2013-03-17x86 intel: Add Firmware Interface Table supportAaron Durbin
Haswell CPUs require a FIT table in the firmware. This commit adds rudimentary support for a FIT table. The number of entries in the table is based on a configuration option. The code only generates a type 0 entry. A follow-on tool will need to be developed to populate the FIT entries as well as checksumming the table. Verified image has a FIT pointer and table when option is selected. Change-Id: I3a314016a09a1cc26bf1fb5d17aa50853d2ef4f8 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2642 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>