Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU.
We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was
essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase
and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot.
Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891
Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
The ARM Makefile was copied from x86 and then modified, and as a result it
was carrying a lot of baggage. On top of that, the extra complication made it
inflexible, and we need a lot of flexiblity in order to support the fact that
the Tegra124 starts on an ARMv4 coprocessor instead of one of the ARMv7 main
CPUs.
Change-Id: Ia6ddc27619bdb51e152ad0c628ad6f3037c103ce
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171017
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 512d942788336c8d52470135b43ee4e6a1c95f6c)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6709
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
|
|
This patch cleans out a lot of unused variables in the
ARM Kconfig files and introduces CONFIG_RAMSTAGE_BASE
which is similar to CONFIG_RAMBASE on x86.
This gets rid of the hard coded assumption that on ARM
coreboot is always executed at the lowest DRAM address.
But in fact, this might not be true because we might want
coreboot to live at the end of RAM, or in SRAM
Change-Id: I03e992645f9eb730e39a521aa21f702959311f74
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/168645
Reviewed-by: David Hendrix <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: David Hendrix <dhendrix@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 15b87892eb2d5e27759c49dc6c8c7e626f651d77)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6634
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Since we're now supporting ARMv7 relocations, we can enable
rmodule support on Exynos 5420. This does not automatically
enable relocatable ramstage.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Change-Id: Ic3af1eabb3b816944587a46409224f778d941b8a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/167403
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
(cherry picked from commit 7b5afef4ee87fc3245ec887dfda873c529d8d04d)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6629
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
|
|
This improves firmware boot time substantially. Because cbmem isn't available
yet, we need to allocate some space in sram for the ttb. Doing cache
initialization in the bootblock means we can implement this once per CPU
instead of once per mainboard.
Old-Change-Id: Iad339de24df8ec2e23f91fe7bf57744e4cc766c5
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/65938
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c32b9b32ad933e627b9ea98434b392239b1fea73)
exynos5420: flush caches and disable MMU in resume path
This patch flushes the caches and disables the MMU before resuming.
c32b9b3 ("Set up caching in the bootblock.") had a bug where the
dcache and MMU remained enabled in the resume path. This caused
the machine to hang on resume. However, other bugs were preventing
us from testing this properly earlier on so it went unnoticed until
now.
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Old-Change-Id: Ib1774f09d286a4d659da9fc2dad1d7a6fc1ebe5e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/67007
Reviewed-by: ron minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4fdf9763d25f70fd1e3591f6ff9785f78dd6170d)
Squashed two related commits.
Change-Id: Ibd42b28bb06930159248130e5ceaddb3b4b6cc2a
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6511
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
|
|
On x86, cpu_info lives at the top of stack. Make the arm do that as
well, as the threading model needs that and so will multicore support.
As part of this change, make the stack size a power of 2.
Also make it much smaller -- 2048 bytes is PLENTY for ram stage.
Note that the small stack size is counterintuitive for rom stage. How
can this work in rom stage, which needs a HUGE stack for lzma? The
main use of STACK_SIZE has always been in ram stage; since 2002 or so
it was to size per-core stacks (see, e.g.,
src/arch/x86/lib/c_start.S:.space CONFIG_MAX_CPUS*CONFIG_STACK_SIZE
and, more recently, thread stacks. So, we define the STACK_TOP for rom
and ram stage, but the STACK_SIZE has no real effect on the ROM stage
(no hardware red zones on the stack) and hence we're ok with actually
defining the "wrong" stack size. In fact, the coreboot_ram ldscript
for armv7 sizes the stack by subtracting CONFIG_STACK_BOTTOM from
CONFIG_STACK_TOP, so we replicate that arithmetic in bootblock.inc
Observed stack usage in ramstage:
BS: BS_PAYLOAD_LOAD times (us): entry 1 run 153887 exit 1
Jumping to boot code at 23104044
CPU0: stack: 02072800 - 02073000, lowest used address 020728d4, stack used: 1836 bytes
entry = 23104044
Which means we do need 2K, not 1K.
Change-Id: I1a21db87081597efe463095bfd33c89eba1d569f
Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/66135
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit f011097e9f2bfb2f4c1109d465be89a79a65ba3e)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6501
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
We set up L2 cache early in romstage now so the old
function is now redundant.
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Old-Change-Id: Icec93810ddd7feb48286d4b600cb2d58af38b7ef
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/65428
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit bb91f1078ea55a7c8bdc19336cef2ec9a5f4511f)
exynos: stack size: Increase the stack size to 16KB.
The lzma decoding function in the RAM stage allocates nearly 16KB on the stack
which is shared between the bootblock, rom stage, and ram stage. The stack had
been much too small and needed to be expanded.
Old-Change-Id: I1b74fff9b54e506320d58956b779b3a102e66868
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/65937
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 243d8a80f68dd257ecc5b4e19614bc7f0f5d398b)
exynos: gpio: add a bigger delay when reading board strappings
Z-state pins were not reading reliably with a 5us delay, so increase
it to 15us.
This is ported from https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/64338
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Old-Change-Id: Ife6ea2ef5989e1a4c17913278ab972f0fd7f7f35
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/65727
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 76f0f8203f1af3f461745cefcc94e97c422d9084)
exynos5420: enable DMC internal clock gating
lets enable memory controller internal clock gating for ddr3.
with these bits enabled we save some power out of ddr3.
This is ported from https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/#/c/60774
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Old-Change-Id: I2f9b0d78483b3ea7441f54a715c7c1e42eda3f7f
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/65728
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 022a81c44e655a9f81e974e730c0cecc1f048781)
exynos5420: Correct the 600MHz PMS value
In UM ver0.02, 600MHz clock PMS values differs from what is programed
currently. Though this also results in 600MHz clock, but it is better to
match what UM says. This patch chnage this as per UM
This is ported from https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/#/c/65106/3
(Note: we already used the correct 600MHz value for KPLL)
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Old-Change-Id: I6786815ab33427a23436e6ee37295f6c37dcd3d5
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/65726
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit ceabf57ca78449fa6e9cfd212bdf4774706de92f)
Squashed five commits pertaining to exynos.
Change-Id: I3fd894aed15b8cd161c30904a46dac7e07eb8992
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6425
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
|
|
The SMP on Exynos 5420 requires setting a special page and entry wrappers in
firmware side (SRAM) so kernel can start cores (and to switch clusters).
Change-Id: I77ca98bb6cff5b13e95dd29228e4536302f0aee9
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/64770
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 4a11c7ab78cc0811df0f88763b0af8b9f24e5433)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6405
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
|
|
Make all three coreboot stages (bootblock, romstage and ramstage) aware of the
architecture specific to that stage i.e. we will have CONFIG_ARCH variables for
each of the three stages. This allows us to have an SOC with any combination of
architectures and thus every stage can be made to run on a completely different
architecture independent of others. Thus, bootblock can have an x86 arch whereas
romstage and ramstage can have arm32 and arm64 arch respectively. These stage
specific CONFIG_ARCH_ variables enable us to select the proper set of toolchain
and compiler flags for every stage.
These options can be considered as either arch or modes eg: x86 running in
different modes or ARM having different arch types (v4, v7, v8). We have got rid
of the original CONFIG_ARCH option completely as every stage can have any
architecture of its own. Thus, almost all the components of coreboot are
identified as being part of one of the three stages (bootblock, romstage or
ramstage). The components which cannot be classified as such e.g. smm, rmodules
can have their own compiler toolset which is for now set to *_i386. Hence, all
special classes are treated in a similar way and the compiler toolset is defined
using create_class_compiler defined in Makefile.
In order to meet these requirements, changes have been made to CC, LD, OBJCOPY
and family to add CC_bootblock, CC_romstage, CC_ramstage and similarly others.
Additionally, CC_x86_32 and CC_armv7 handle all the special classes. All the
toolsets are defined using create_class_compiler.
Few additional macros have been introduced to identify the class to be used at
various points, e.g.: CC_$(class) derives the $(class) part from the name of
the stage being compiled.
We have also got rid of COREBOOT_COMPILER, COREBOOT_ASSEMBLER and COREBOOT_LINKER
as they do not make any sense for coreboot as a whole. All these attributes are
associated with each of the stages.
Change-Id: I923f3d4fb097d21071030b104c372cc138c68c7b
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5577
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
|
|
CONFIG_ARCH is a property of the cpu or soc rather than a property of the
board. Hence, move ARCH_* from every single board to respective cpu or soc
Kconfigs. Also update abuild to ignore ARCH_ from mainboards.
Change-Id: I6ec1206de5a20601c32d001a384a47f46e6ce479
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5570
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Correct selection of UART depends of board layout, not the CPU
internals, so default setting should originate from mainboard.
Change-Id: Ibf0ab0847ccce73c22704e86983dbe3d24ebc8a0
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5618
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
We have means to easily disable a specific console in romstage if
necessary, so this global option makes little sense.
The option was initially introduced as a work-around for build issues
around CACHE_AS_RAM, ROMCC and ARCH_ARMV7 dependencies for UARTs.
Change-Id: I797bdd11a48ddd813d3ee7ccef9a0c050f16f669
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5607
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
The port for console remains to be a compile time constant.
The Kconfig option is changed to select an UART port with index
to avoid putting map of UART base addresses in Kconfigs.
With this change it is possible to have other than debug console
on different UART port.
Change-Id: Ie1845a946f8d3b2604ef5404edb31b2e811f3ccd
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5342
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Option DRIVERS_UART builds with support for UART hardware.
Option CONSOLE_SERIAL enables the console output for UART.
Those x86 boards that do not have serial port on SuperIO should select
NO_UART_ON_SUPERIO to disable 8250 UART for the default configuration.
Removes:
CONSOLE_SERIAL_UART
HAVE_UART_IO_MAPPED
HAVE_UART_MEMORY_MAPPED
Renames:
CONSOLE_SERIAL8250 -> DRIVERS_UART_8250IO
CONSOLE_SERIAL8250MEM -> DRIVERS_UART_8250MEM
Change-Id: Id3afa05f85c0d6849746886db8b6c2ed6c846b61
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5311
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
The calculations for static allocation are no longer valid.
Change-Id: I6740cdcec789abddf78485a0edaf24882ef8c2a5
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4569
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
|
|
... In order to do this, the graphics memory has to move into
the resource allocator and out of CBMEM.
Change-Id: I565c3d6dea747822fbabf6f3845232d4adfbf333
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/63657
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4391
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
SYS_TEXT_BASE is not used by any one. To prevent confusion when changing memory
layout, remove it from current configurations.
Change-Id: I15012b864bbb9c12003843b9b24ea64c91f4578b
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/61853
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4371
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
Change-Id: I6b28bb95c7decbe3eed33b5b5a029bee48bbe403
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3691
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
For all other CPUs, we unconditionally include the CPU Kconfig
files in the CPU directory, not in the vendor directory. Do the
same thing for the Exynos CPUs. This allows us to make CPU dependent
changes in the directory of that CPU alone.
Also, drop some unused Kconfig variables from the Exynos Kconfig
files.
Change-Id: I4e4c22a0693988834e619dd33d121bf994ed57e8
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3683
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Not all ARM systems need "BL1", and the layout of BL* and bootblock may be
different (ex, Exynos 5250 may use a new BL1 with variable length checksum
header).
To support that better, define the real base address (and ROM offset) of boot
block, and then we can post-processing ROM image file by filling data / checksum
and any other information.
Change-Id: I0e3105e52500b6b457371ad33a9aa546acf28928
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3664
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Some of the settings which were defaulted to or automatically selected for the
exynos5420 which were inherited from the exynos5250 were not correct for this
SOC.
Change-Id: I11ffd8a6b80628405ac493fe2139f79c05d15d7e
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3645
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This change creates an exynos5420 directory with code that will eventually
implement support for the exynos5420 cpu from Samsung. Currently it's a copy
of the exynos5250 directory with the name changed. There are going to be some
problems where headers in src/cpu/samsung/exynos-common include headers in the
exynos5250 directory directly.
Change-Id: Ia8d7244310d32499238bbc171c0c668ec48178e1
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3644
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|