Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU.
We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was
essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase
and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot.
Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891
Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
All this samsung_get_base_address_of_device_with_a_really_long_name()
boilerplate makes my eyes bleed... I think there are so much cleaner
ways to do this. Unfortunately changing this ends up touching nearly
every Exynos5 file, but I hope you agree that it's worth it (and the
sooner we get it over with, the better... I can't bring myself to make
another device fit into that ugly scheme).
This also removes the redundant EXYNOS5 base address definitions from
the 5420 directory when there are EXYNOS5420 ones, to avoid complete
confusion. The new scheme tries to use EXYNOS5 for base addresses and
exynos5 for types that are common between the two processors, and
EXYNOS5420/exynos5420 for things that have changes (although I probably
didn't catch all differences).
Change-Id: I87e58434490ed55a9bbe743af1f9bf2520dec13f
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/167579
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: ron minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 66c87693352c248eec029c1ce83fb295059e6b5b)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6632
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Apparently the IROM doesn't like data caches... the recently added
dcache-in-bootblock makes A-A booting fail, and flushes/invalidations
alone don't seem to fix it. It's pretty fast anyway, so we just disable
the cache again for the duration of the IROM call.
Also removes a superfluous invalidation line from the bootblock code...
dcache_mmu_enable/disable already take care of that.
Old-Change-Id: I35580d15664c7b4197d4ed14028720147adbf918
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/66602
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit e9c28a6a7a88c8286e62764ee5ad2694da2e822f)
exynos5: Implement booting from SDMMC media
This patch augments the alternative CBFS media source implementation for
Exynos5250 and Exynos5420 to allow booting from SDMMC devices (such as
an SD or uSD card reader, if available). It also moves MMC
initialization for the Snow, Pit and Kirby boards from romstage to
ramstage (mainboard_init) to prevent it from interfering with the IROM
during SDMMC boot.
Old-Change-Id: Ic4adef80c28262d084a53c28ec59aa7ac3af50c8
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/66154
(cherry picked from commit 08de13b72432c076e3327c048df93d89d52b0ecc)
snow and pit: turn on FET4 (for SD card) at bootup
Explictly enable FET4 on Snow and Pit.
Historically we haven't needed to do this because:
* On snow there's a bypass around FET4 which effectively eliminates
it. Even if we don't turn on FET4 the SD card is still powered.
Turning on FET4 doesn't hurt though and is technically correct.
* On pit the EC turns on FET4 on cold bootup.
On pit we run into a problem if the kernel turns off FET4 like in
<https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/#/c/65332/> and then we get a
software reset or warm reset. In this case the EC won't know to turn
it back on.
This was ported from: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/#/c/65673
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Old-Change-Id: I57337f12b38889e6afee8577cf8807ec4c41e91c
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/66786
Commit-Queue: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Tested-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit e910117047d898b6b1d0dc965ef2ec0237d17646)
Squashed three commits for alternate cbfs SD support.
Change-Id: Idbd1fd4776cbf8cb20d03e6b691104cd8540a1ec
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6530
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch ports the USB A-A firmware upload functionality from
exynos5250 over to exynos5420. Essentially just like a conflictless
cherry-pick of 9e69421f5f0eebf88c09913dee90082feab2856c. It also fixes
the exact same bug with SPI initialization for Pit and Kirby.
Old-Change-Id: Ief0ed54c0beb2701e51201041f9bc426b2167747
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/65751
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 5dff43f929478f83939221df13b961a69f89b132)
exynos5: Fix trivial style nits
A few curly braces on the wrong line.
Old-Change-Id: I4ddac4476c6509dc1716e8c1915fbdb67d346786
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/66153
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 41e3fd9eaafe36433723f4e96a6d94c04e5fbafb)
Squashed two related commits.
Change-Id: I22d579693b5e7270aacb45bbe3557e40893dd1f8
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6500
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
|