summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/cpu/samsung
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2013-07-10pit: Create an exynos5420 directory which is nearly a copy of exynos5250.Gabe Black
This change creates an exynos5420 directory with code that will eventually implement support for the exynos5420 cpu from Samsung. Currently it's a copy of the exynos5250 directory with the name changed. There are going to be some problems where headers in src/cpu/samsung/exynos-common include headers in the exynos5250 directory directly. Change-Id: Ia8d7244310d32499238bbc171c0c668ec48178e1 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3644 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-07-10ARMv7: De-uboot-ify Exynos5250 GPIO codeStefan Reinauer
The Exynos GPIO code has three different APIs that, unfortunately, were widely used throughout the code base. This patch is cleaning up the mess. Change-Id: I09ccc7819fb892dbace9693c786dacc62f3f8eac Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3643 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-07-10ARMv7: De-uboot-ify Exynos5250 codeStefan Reinauer
When starting the Exynos5250 port, a lot of unneeded u-boot code was imported. This is an attempt to get rid of a lot of unneeded code before the port is used as a basis for further ARM ports. There is a lot more that can be done, including cleaning up the 5250's Kconfig file. Change-Id: I2d88676c436eea4b21bcb62f40018af9fabb3016 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3642 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-07-10Update 3rdparty hash for latest ARM BL1 binariesStefan Reinauer
Change-Id: Ice28114e5f53f510d305cd85d095044e2f4bd7b2 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3740 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-07-10samsung/exynos5250: unify codeStefan Reinauer
It turns out that the exynos5-common code previously imported from u-boot is not common code at all but very specific to the 5250 and not compatible with the 5450. Hence, unify the directories exynos5250 and exynos5-common. We will try to factor out common code while progressing with the 5450 port. Change-Id: Iab595e66fcd01eda8365c96fb8bef896f7602f03 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3641 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-07-10Wield battle axe at ARM portStefan Reinauer
This patch unfortunately incorporates a number of changes, all of which are making future ARM ports easier. - drop cruft that came in with u-boot - move serial console from mainboard Kconfig to Exynos Kconfig - factor out non-board specific wakeup code - move generic bootblock code from mainboard to Exynos - actually call arch_cpu_init() - remove dead code - fix up copyright messages - remove snow_ prefix from a lot of code to reduce the noise when creating a new mainboard based on that code. Change-Id: Ic05326edf5a7e1a691c5ff841a604cb9e351b562 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3640 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-05-14EXYNOS5250/SNOW: fix the build script. Add a script to get the bl1.Ronald G. Minnich
build-snow got broken when the snow makefile improved. So fix it. While we're at it, create a script like the update-microcode scripts that gets the bl1. I thought about making this a common script but the various names and paths always evolve, leaving me thinking it's not worth it. This script is just a piece of the snow build script. Change-Id: I65c0f8697a978c62fe12533c4f0152d14dbaefda Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3238 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
2013-05-07exynos5: select HAVE_MONOTONIC_TIMERDavid Hendricks
We have the monotonic timer implemented on exynos now, and this also enables helpful bootstage prints with timing info. Change-Id: I3baa4c9d70d4b4d059abd5e05eddcabd5258dbfd Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3210 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2013-05-06exynos5250/snow: deprecate time.hDavid Hendricks
This re-introduces 2fde966 (http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/3177/) which was reverted due to unsatisfied dependencies. time.h We Hardly Knew Ye. This deprecates time.h which is currently only used by Exynos5250 and Snow. The original idea was to try and unify some of the various timer interfaces and has been supplanted by the monotonic timer API. timer_us() is now obsolete. timer_start() is now mct_start() and is exposed in exynos5250/clk.h. Change-Id: I8e60105629d9da68ed622e89209b3ef6c8e2445b Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3201 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-05-05exynos5/5250: Update timer call sites to use monotonic timer APIDavid Hendricks
This goes thru various call sites where we used timer_us() and updates them to use the new monotonic timer API. udelay() changed substantially and now gracefully handles wraparound. Change-Id: Ie2cc86a4125cf0de12837fd7d337a11aed25715c Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3176 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-05-04Revert "exynos5250/snow: deprecate time.h"David Hendricks
This reverts commit 2fde9668b47e74d1bfad2f1688a4481e6b966d04 Somehow this got merged before its dependencies. 3190 must be merged first, followed by 3176. However 3190 will fail while this patch is in. So the situation can't correct itself. Reverting this until the other two go in. Change-Id: I176f37c12711849c96f1889eacad38c00a8142c4 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3195 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2013-05-03exynos5250/snow: deprecate time.hDavid Hendricks
time.h We Hardly Knew Ye. This deprecates time.h which is currently only used by Exynos5250 and Snow. The original idea was to try and unify some of the various timer interfaces and has been supplanted by the monotonic timer API. timer_us() is now obsolete. timer_start() is now mct_start() and is exposed in exynos5250/clk.h. Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Change-Id: I14ebf75649d101491252c9aafea12f73ccf446b5 Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3177 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-05-03exynos5250: monotonic timer implementation (using MCT)David Hendricks
This implements the new monotonic timer API using the global multi-core timer (MCT). Change-Id: Id56249ff5d3e0f85808f5754954c83c0bc75f1c1 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3175 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-26exynos5250: uncomment $(INTERMEDIATE)David Hendricks
This makes the intermediate rule visible so BL1 gets automatically placed in the final image. Change-Id: Iffb0268e5bbcbe135f2d39863ed64fa302409a22 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3141 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-25google/snow: Add "wakeup" module for suspend/resume.Hung-Te Lin
The "wakeup" procedure will be shared by bootblock and romstage for different types of resume processes. Note, this commit does not include changes in romstage/bootblock to enable suspend/resume feature. Simply adding functions to handle suspend/resume. Verified by successfully building and booting Google/Snow firmware image. Change-Id: I17a256afb99f2f8b5e0eac3393cdf6959b239341 Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3129 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-04-25arm/exynos: Allow DRAM controller to be initialized without clearing RAM ↵Hung-Te Lin
content. To support suspend/resume, PHY control must be reset only on normal boot path. So add a new param "mem_reset" to specify that. Verified to boot successfully on Google/Snow. Change-Id: Id49bc6c6239cf71a67ba091092dd3ebf18e83e33 Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3128 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-04-23GOOGLE/SNOW: get graphics workingRonald G. Minnich
This adds support for display bring-up on Snow. It includes framebuffer initialization and LCD enable functions. Change-Id: I16e711c97e9d02c916824f621e2313297448732b Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3116 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-23exynos5250: ungate the product ID registerDavid Hendricks
This makes sure that the product ID (PRO_ID) register can be read when the OS kernel is figuring out what kind of CPU it's running on. For historical reference, the original U-Boot code seems to have worked basically by accident here. The hardware has a quirk where by reading the value before gating the IP block keeps the value persistent. U-Boot reads the chip ID early on to distinguish between chip family, but we do not mix code the same way so we do not read the chip ID. Since the value has been read before the clock gating happens, the value remains available for the kernel to use during the decompression stage. We don't want to rely on that behavior when using coreboot. Instead the kernel should gate unused IPs. (credit to Gabe for finding symptom in the kernel) Change-Id: Iaa21e6e718b9000b5558f568020f393779fd208e Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3121 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-22GOOGLE/SNOW: fix stupid paren errorRonald G. Minnich
This simple error led to corrupted graphics. How annoying. Change-Id: I2295c0df0f1d16014a603dc5d66bd4d72f3fb7c9 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3120 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-19exynos5: eliminate lcd_base variableDavid Hendricks
The original imported code used "lcdbase" and "lcd_base" which quite predictably caused confusion and bugs. Let's put an end to this little bit of insanity. Change-Id: I4f995482cfbff5f23bb296a1e6d35beccf5f8a91 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3114 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-19exynos5250: get xres and yres out of the device tree and into the panel ↵Ronald G. Minnich
descriptor We neglected to copy xres and yres out; now we do. Change-Id: Icc4a8eb35799d156b11274f71bcfb4a1d10e01e3 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3111 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-19[2/3] exynos5: modify thermal management unit code for corebootDavid Hendricks
This updates the Exynos TMU code for coreboot: - Remove dependency on device tree - Add Makefile entries Change-Id: I55e1b624d7c7b695b1253ec55f6ae3de8dc671bc Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3107 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-19[1/3] exynos5: import thermal management unit codeDavid Hendricks
This simply imports the Exynos TMU driver from u-boot. It is not built and thus should not break anything. Change-Id: I7861132fbf97f864e4250ffbda1ef3843f296ddc Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3106 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-19exynos5: move power_enable_hw_thermal_trip() prototypeDavid Hendricks
This moves the prototype for power_enable_hw_thermal_trip() to a generic location so it can be used by generalized thermal management code. The implementation will still be CPU-specific. Change-Id: Iae449cb8c72c8441dedaf65b73db9898b4730cef Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3105 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-17armv7/exynos5250: Deprecate sdelay in favor of udelayDavid Hendricks
This gets rid of the clock-tick based sdelay in favor of udelay(). udelay() is more consistent and easier to work with, and this allows us to carry one less variation of timers (and headers and sources...). Every 1 unit in the sdelay() argument was assumed to cause a delay of 2 clock ticks (@1.7GHz). So the conversion factor is roughly: sdelay(N) = udelay(((N * 2) / 1.7 * 10^9) * 10^6) = udelay((N * 2) / (1.7 * 10^3)) The sdelay() periods used were: sdelay(100) --> udelay(1) sdelay(0x10000) --> udelay(78) (rounded up to udelay(100)) There was one instance of sdelay(10000), which looked like sort of a typo since sdelay(0x10000) was used elsewhere. sdelay(10000) should approximate to about 12us, so we'll stick with that for now and leave a note. Change-Id: I5e7407865ceafa701eea1d613bbe50cf4734f33e Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3079 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-04-17Samsung/exynos5250: convert unsigned {int,char} to u32/u8Ronald G. Minnich
The types are (esp. int) are confusing at times as to size. Make them definite as to size. Change-Id: Id7808f1f61649ec0a3403c1afc3c2c3d4302b7fb Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3103 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
2013-04-13exynos5/snow: remove wait_ms arg from dp_controller_init()David Hendricks
This removes the wait_ms argument from the dp_controller_init(). The only delay involved is a constant 60ms delay that happens if everything else goes well. This delay is derived from the LCD spec so there's no reason it should be baked into the controller code. (This patch also has the side-effect of fixing a bug where we were delaying on an undefined value for wait_ms). Change-Id: I03aa19f2ac2f720524fcb7c795e10cc57f0a226e Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3078 Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-04-13Exynos5250: add a microsecond timerRonald G. Minnich
Add a microsecond timer, its declaration, the function to start it, and its usage. To start it, one calls timer_start(). From that point on, one can call timer_us() to find microseconds since the timer was started. We show its use in the bootblock. You want it started very early. Finally, the delay.h change having been (ironically) delayed, we create time.h and have it hold one declaration, for the timer_us() and timer_start() prototype. We feel that these two functions should become the hardware specific functions, allowing us to finally move udelay() into src/lib where it belongs. Change-Id: I19cbc2bb0089a3de88cfb94276266af38b9363c5 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3073 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-11Exynos5250: Use new chip settings for the cpuRonald G. Minnich
Properly use the chip settings when configuring the CPU, at this point being purely graphics. Change-Id: I9bc2d32c1037653837937b314e4041abc0024835 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3054 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
2013-04-10GOOGLE/SNOW: add edp support to ramstageRonald G. Minnich
Add basic edp support to the ramstage. Not working. Change-Id: I15086e03417edca7426c214e67b51719d8ed9341 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3055 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-10exynos5-common: Enable fimd_bypass and minor cleanupRonald G. Minnich
Basic cleanup, this code still does not work. Change-Id: I84ed9f08fd04cd8eb74cd860e0775d8c602f42d6 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3049 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-10armv7: replace read/write macros with inlinesDavid Hendricks
This enables type checking for safety as to help prevent errors like http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/3038/ . Now compilation fails if the wrong type is passed into readb/readw/readl/writeb/writew/writel or other macros in io.h. This also deprecates readw/writew. The previous definition was 16-bits which is incorrect since wordsize on ARMv7 is 32-bits and there was only 1 instance of writew (#if 0'd anyway). Going forward we should always use read{8,16,32} and write{8,16,32} where N specifies the exact length rather than relying on ambiguous definition of wordsize. Since many macros relied on __raw_*, which were basically the same (minus data memory barrier instructions), this patch also gets rid of __raw_*. There were parts of the code which ended up using these macros consecutively, for example: setbits_le32(&regs->ch_cfg, SPI_CH_RST); clrbits_le32(&regs->ch_cfg, SPI_CH_RST); In such cases the safe versions of readl() and writel() should be used anyway. Note: This also fixes two dubious casts as to avoid breaking compilation. Change-Id: I8850933f68ea3a9b615d00ebd422f7c242268f1c Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3045 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-04-10exynos5: Re-factor I2C codeDavid Hendricks
This re-factors the Exynos5 I2C code to be simpler and use the new API, and updates users accordingly. - i2c_read() and i2c_write() functions updated to take bus number as an argument. - Get rid of the EEPROM_ADDR_OVERFLOW stuff in i2c_read() and i2c_write(). If a chip needs special handling we should take care of it elsewhere, not in every low-level i2c driver. - All the confusing bus config functions eliminated. No more i2c_set_early_config() or i2c_set_bus() or i2c_get_bus(). All this is handled automatically when the caller does a transaction and specifies the desired bus number. - i2c_probe() eliminated. We're not a command-line utility. - Let the compiler place static variables automatically. We don't need any of this fancy manual data placement. - Remove dead code while we're at it. This stuff was ported early on and much of it was left commented out in case we needed it. Some also includes nested macros which caused gcc to complain. - Clean up #includes (no more common.h, woohoo!), replace debug() with printk(). Change-Id: I8e1f974ea4c6c7db9f33b77bbc4fb16008ed0d2a Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3044 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-04-09replace device/i2c.h with simpler versionDavid Hendricks
The existing header was imported along with the Exynos code and left mostly unchanged. This is the first patch in a series intended to replace the imported u-boot I2C API with a much simpler and cleaner interface: - We only need to expose i2c_read() and i2c_write() in our public API. Everything else is board/chip-dependent and should remain hidden away. - i2c_read and i2c_write functions will take bus number as an arg and we'll eliminate i2c_get_bus and i2c_set_bus. Those are prone to error and end up cluttering the code since the user needs to save the old bus number, set the new one, do the read/write, and restore the old value (3 added steps to do a simple transaction). - Stop setting default values for board-specific things like SPD and RTC bus numbers (as if we always have an SPD or RTC on I2C). - Death to all the trivial inline wrappers. And in case there was any doubt, we really don't care about the MPC8xx. Though if we did then we would not pollute the public API with its idiosyncrasies. Change-Id: I4410a3c82ed5a6b2e80e3d8c0163464a9ca7c3b0 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3043 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-04-08exynos5250: add missing address-of operator in UART driverDavid Hendricks
This adds a missing address-of operator. This was a subtle bug that didn't seem to cause problems at first since the serial console appeared to work. However it caused an imprecise external abort which became apparent later on when aborts were unmasked in the kernel via the CPSR_A bit. (credit goes to Gabe Black for finding this) Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Change-Id: I80a33b147d92d559fa8fefbe7d5642235deb9aea Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3038 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-04-08snow/exynos5250: move board-specific power stuff to mainboard dirDavid Hendricks
This moves highly board-specific code out from the Exynos5250 power_init() into Snow's romstage.c. There's no reason the CPU- specific code should care about which PMIC we are using and which bus it is on. Change-Id: I52313177395519cddcab11225fc23d5e50c4c4e3 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3034 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-04-06exynos5250: add a chip.h file for the display register settingsRonald G. Minnich
Display hardware is part of this SOC, and we need to be able to set certain variables in devicetree.cb. This chip file contains the initial things we think we need to set. Change-Id: I16f2d4228c87116dbeb53a3c9f3f359a6444f552 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3031 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-05exynos5-common: get rid of displayport trial codeRonald G. Minnich
This was a first pass at display port support, we have realized that it was ultimately a bad path. The display hardware is intimately tied into a specific cpu and mainboard combination, and the code has to be elsewhere. The devicetree formatting is ugly, but it matters not: it's changing soon. Change-Id: Iddce54f9e7219a7569315565fac65afbbe0edd29 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3029 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-03-29exynos5250: Add function for configuring L2 cacheDavid Hendricks
This adds a new function to configure L2 cache for the exynos5250 and deprecates the old function. Change-Id: I9562f3301aa1e2911dae3856ab57bb6beec2e224 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2949 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabe.black@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-03-27exynos5250: assign RAM resources in cpu_init()David Hendricks
This moves the ram resource allocation into cpu_init() so that we no longer rely on declaring a domain in devicetree.cb (which is kind of weird for this platform). This does not cause any actual changes to the coreboot memory table, and paves the way for further updates to Snow's devicetree. Change-Id: I141277f59b5d48288f409257bf556a1cfa7a8463 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2923 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-03-26Revert "samsung/exynos5: add resource functions for the display port"David Hendricks
This reverts commit 9427ca151e44644238b1b52138894195a9f5175f Looks like we were a bit too anxious to see this one get in. The devicetree.cb change seems to have broken things. coreboot memory table: 0. 0000000050000000-000000005000ffff: RESERVED 1. 00000000bff00000-00000000bfffffff: CONFIGURATION TABLES 2. 0000014004000000-00000140044007ff: RESERVED Before this patch: coreboot memory table: 0. 0000000040000000-00000000bfefffff: RAM 1. 00000000bff00000-00000000bfffffff: CONFIGURATION TABLES Change-Id: I618e4f1976265d56cfd6a61d0c5736c55a0f3cec Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2914 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
2013-03-26samsung/exynos5: add resource functions for the display portRonald G. Minnich
This does NOT turn on the graphics. The device tree has been changed enough so that, at the very least, the correct functions are called at the correct time, with the correct paramaters. We decided to yank the I2C entries as they did not obvious function and might not even have been correct. Not working, seemingly, but we need to add a 4M resource for memory, and it seems it needs to be fixed at the address shown. This address was chosen from current hardware. We realized that the display code should be part of the cpu -- that's how the hardware works! Change-Id: Ied65a554f833566be817540702f79a02e7b6cb6e Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2615 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-03-19armv7/exynos/snow: new cache maintenance APIDavid Hendricks
This adds a new API for cache maintenance operations. The idea is to be more explicit about operations that are going on so it's easier to manage branch predictor, cache, and TLB cleans and invalidations. Also, this adds some operations that were missing but required early on, such as branch predictor invalidation. Instruction and sync barriers were wrong earlier as well since the imported API assumed we compield with -march=armv5 (which we don't) and was missing wrappers for the native ARMv7 ISB/DSB/DMB instructions. For now, this is a start and it gives us something we can easily use in libpayload for doing things like cleaning and invalidating dcache when doing DMA transfers. TODO: - Set cache policy explicitly before re-enabling. Right now it's left at default. - Finish deprecating old cache maintenance API. - We do an extra icache/dcache flush when going from bootblock to romstage. Change-Id: I7390981190e3213f4e1431f8e56746545c5cc7c9 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2729 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-03-14exynos5250: add RAM resource beginning at physical addressDavid Hendricks
The original code attempted to reserve a space in RAM for coreboot to remain resident. This turns out not to be needed, and breaks things for the kernel since the exynos5250-smdk5250 kernel device tree starts RAM at 0x40000000. (This patch was originally by Gabe, I'm just uploading it) Change-Id: I4536edaf8785d81a3ea008216a2d57549ce5edfb Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2698 Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-03-13exynos5250/snow: enable branch predictionDavid Hendricks
This enables branch prediction. We can probably find a better place to do this, but for now we'll do it in snow's romstage main(). Change-Id: I86c7b6bc9e897a7a432c490fb96a126e81b8ce72 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2701 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-03-13exynos5250: Don't set PS_HOLD in bootblock_cpu_initDavid Hendricks
PS_HOLD gets set in exynos' power_init(). Change-Id: Ib08e0afcad23cbd07dc7e3727fd958a1bc868b5a Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2700 Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-03-13exynos5250/snow: call PMIC's power_init() functionDavid Hendricks
Call the power_init() function. We appear to have forgotten about it when deprecating lowlevel_init_subsystems(), but it didn't seem to cause problems until we got to doing more interesting stuff recently. There are some clean-ups to do from the original code, such as not attempting to configure I2C from PMIC code, which we'll get around to in follow-up patches. (Credit to Gabe for spotting this) Change-Id: I6a59379e9323277d0b61469de9abe6d651ac5bfb Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2699 Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-03-07exynos5: add GPIO port enumsDavid Hendricks
This adds an enum for GPIO ports on the Exynos5. To make them useful, they are assigned the absolute MMIO address where a s5p_gpio_bank struct can point to. Change-Id: Ia539ba52d7393501d434ba8fecde01da37b0d8aa Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2602 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-03-06samsung/exynos5: add display port and framebuffer defines and initializationRonald G. Minnich
These are essential functions for setting up the display port and framebuffer, and also enable such things as aux channel communications. We do some very simple initialization in romstage, mainly set a GPIO so that the graphics is powering up, but the complex parts are done in the ramstage. This mirrors the way in which graphics is done in the x86 size. I've added a first pass at a real device, and put it in the mainboard Kconfig, hoping for corrections. Because startup is so complex, depending on device type, I've created a 'displayport' device that removes some of the complexity and makes the flow *much* clearer. You can actually follow the flow by looking at the code, which is not true on other implementations. Since display port is perhaps the main port used on these chips, that's a reasonable compromise. All parameters of importance are now in the device tree. Change-Id: I56400ec9016ecb8716ec5a5dae41fdfbfff4817a Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2570 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-03-04ARM: remove code that is IMHO a dangerous designRonald G. Minnich
OK, this is tl;dr. But I need to write this in hopes we make sure we don't put code like this into coreboot. Ever. Our excuse in this case is that it was imported, not obviously wrong, and easily changed. It made sense to get it in, make it work, then do a cleanup pass, because changing everything up front is almost impossible to debug. The exynos code has bunch of base register values, e.g. These are base addresses of things that look like a memory-mapped struct. To get these to a pointer, they created the following macro, which creates an inline function. static inline unsigned int samsung_get_base_##device(void) \ { \ return cpu_is_exynos5() ? EXYNOS5_##base : 0; \ } And then invoke it 31 times in a .h file, e.g.: SAMSUNG_BASE(clock, CLOCK_BASE) to create 31 functions. And then use it: struct exynos5_clock *clk = (struct exynos5_clock *)samsung_get_base_clock(); OK, what's wrong with this? It's easier to ask what's right with it. Answer: nothing. I have a long list of what's wrong, and I may leave some things out, but here goes: 1. the "function" can return a NULL if we're not on exynos5. Most uses of the code don't check the return value. 2. And why would this function be running, if we're not on an exynos5? Why compile it in? 3. Note the cast everywhere a samsung_get_base_xxx is used. The function returns an untyped variable, requiring the *user* to get two things right: the cast, and the function invocation. One can replace that _clock(); with _power(); in the code above, and they will be referencing the wrong registers, and they'll never get an error! We have a C compiler; use it to type data. 4. You're generating 31 functions using cpp each and every time the file is included. The C compiler has to parse these each time. It's not at all like a simple cpp macro which is only generated on use. 5. You can't tags or etags this code 6. In fact, any kind of analysis tool will be unable to do anything with this cpp magic. That's only a partial list. So what's the right way to do it? Just make typed constants, viz: Or, since I expect people will want the lower case function syntax, I've left it that way: Now we've got something that is efficient, and we don't even need to protect with any more. Hence this change. We've got something that is type checked, does not require users to cast on each use, will catch simple programming errors, can be analyzed with standard tools, and builds faster. So if we make a mistake: struct exynos5_clock *clk = samsung_get_base_adc(); We'll see it: src/cpu/samsung/exynos5250/clock.c: In function 'get_pll_clk': src/cpu/samsung/exynos5250/clock.c:183:3: error: initialization from incompatible pointer type [-Werror] which we would not have seen before. As a minor benefit, it shaves most of a second off the compilation. Change-Id: Ie67bc4bc038a8dd1837b977d07332d7d7fd6be1f Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2582 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)