| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-22 | cpu/intel/smm: Drop em64t save state | Arthur Heymans | |
| This save state is just plainly wrong in many regards and em64t100 should be used. Checked with a model 0x17 core2 CPU. Change-Id: I4d89691e87c91dd12b34a44b74849b18b4ac5369 Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36660 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> | |||
| 2019-08-13 | cpu/x86: Separate save_state struct headers | Kyösti Mälkki | |
| Any platform should need just one of these. Change-Id: Ia0ff8eff152cbd3d82e8b372ec662d3737078d35 Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34820 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> | |||
 |
index : coreboot | |
| Some coreboot project code with my work | vimacs |
| summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff |