summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/include/cpu/intel/microcode.h
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-05-11treewide: Remove "this file is part of" linesPatrick Georgi
Stefan thinks they don't add value. Command used: sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool) The exceptions are for: - crossgcc (patch file) - gcov (imported from gcc) - elf.h (imported from GNU's libc) - nvramtool (more complicated header) The removed lines are: - fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */") -# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available -/* This file is part of coreboot */ -# This file is part of msrtool. -/* This file is part of msrtool. */ - * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in -/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */ - * This file is part of the coreboot project. - /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */ -# This file is part of the coreboot project. -# This file is part of the coreboot project. -## This file is part of the coreboot project. --- This file is part of the coreboot project. -/* This file is part of the coreboot project */ -/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */ -;## This file is part of the coreboot project. -# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the - * This file is part of the coreinfo project. -## This file is part of the coreinfo project. - * This file is part of the depthcharge project. -/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */ -/* This file is part of the ectool project. */ - * This file is part of the GNU C Library. - * This file is part of the libpayload project. -## This file is part of the libpayload project. -/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */ -## This file is part of the superiotool project. -/* This file is part of the superiotool project */ -/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */ Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194 Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-04-05src/include: Use SPDX for GPL-2.0-only filesAngel Pons
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now. Change-Id: I2fa3bad88bb5b068baa1cfc6bbcddaabb09da1c5 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40053 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
2020-03-17src (minus soc and mainboard): Remove copyright noticesPatrick Georgi
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example: - What's a "Copyright $year-present"? - Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current copyright holder? - People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even though they only deleted stuff - Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year, because why not? - Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"? - Or "Generated Code"? Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead and use the git history to deal with the rest. Change-Id: I89b10076e0f4a4b3acd59160fb7abe349b228321 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39611 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2018-12-18Fix typos involving "the the"Jonathan Neuschäfer
Change-Id: I179264ee6681a7ba4488b9f1c6bce1a19b4e1772 Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30160 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2018-07-30cpu/intel/microcode: Add helper functions to get microcode infoRizwan Qureshi
Add 4 helper functions to get microcode info. * get_current_microcode_rev return the the version of the currently running microcode. * get_microcode_rev extract microcode revision from the given patch. * get_microcode_size extract microcode size from the given patch. * get_microcode_checksum extract checksum from the given patch. The simpler thing would be to just move the struct microcode to microcode.h so that the structure members can be dereferenced. To encapsulate the structure details added the helper functions. This information will be used in future to compare microcodes for update. Change-Id: I67a08ba40b393874d8cc17363fefe21e2ea904f3 Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27365 Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2016-02-10cpu/intel/microcode: allow microcode to be loaded in romstageAaron Durbin
The previous usage of the intel microcode support supported using the library under ROMCC and ramstage. Allow for microcode support to be used in normal C-based romstage as well by: 1. Only using walkcbfs when ROMCC is defined. 2. Only using spinlocks if !__PRE_RAM__ The header file now unconditionally exposes the declarations of the supporting functions. Change-Id: I903578bcb4422b4c050903c53b60372b64b79af1 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13611 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
2015-10-31tree: drop last paragraph of GPL copyright headerPatrick Georgi
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address. Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we imported) looks out for that. This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further editing. Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2015-07-29Add SoC specific microcode update check in ramstageRizwan Qureshi
Some Intel SoCs which support SGX feature, report the microcode patch revision one less than the actual revision. This results in the same microcode patch getting loaded again. Add a SoC specific check to avoid reloading the same patch. BUG=chrome-os-partner:42046 BRANCH=None TEST=Built for glados and tested on RVP3 CQ-DEPEND=CL:286054 Change-Id: Iab4c34c6c55119045947f598e89352867c67dcb8 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Original-Commit-Id: ab2ed73db3581cd432f9bc84acca47f5e53a0e9b Original-Change-Id: I4f7bf9c841e5800668208c11b0afcf8dba48a775 Original-Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com> Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/287513 Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11055 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2015-05-21Remove address from GPLv2 headersPatrick Georgi
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons but because there are tools that look for them, and giving them a standard pattern simplifies things. However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a new lease, but can drop the address instead. util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that we may want to synchronize every now and then. $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -a \! -name \*.patch \ -a \! -name \*_shipped \ -a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \ -a \! -name LGPL.txt \ -a \! -name COPYING \ -a \! -name DISCLAIMER \ -exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
2014-01-16cpu/intel: Make all Intel CPUs load microcode from CBFSAlexandru Gagniuc
The sequence to inject microcode updates is virtually the same for all Intel CPUs. The same function is used to inject the update in both CBFS and hardcoded cases, and in both of these cases, the microcode resides in the ROM. This should be a safe change across the board. The function which loaded compiled-in microcode is also removed here in order to prevent it from being used in the future. The dummy terminators from microcode need to be removed if this change is to work when generating microcode from several microcode_blob.c files, as is the case for older socketed CPUs. Removal of dummy terminators is done in a subsequent patch. Change-Id: I2cc8220cc4cd4a87aa7fc750e6c60ccdfa9986e9 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4495 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@gmail.com>
2013-12-13cpu: Rename CPU_MICROCODE_IN_CBFS to SUPPORT_CPU_UCODE_IN_CBFSAlexandru Gagniuc
CPU_MICROCODE_IN_CBFS was designed to mean that loading microcode updates from a CBFS file is supported, however, the name implies that microcode is present in CBFS. This has recently caused confusion both with contributions from Google, as well as SAGE. Rename this option to SUPPORT_CPU_UCODE_IN_CBFS in order to make it clearer that what is meant is "hey, the code we have for this CPU supports loading microcode updates from CBFS", and prevent further confusion. Change-Id: I394555f690b5ab4cac6fbd3ddbcb740ab1138339 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4482 Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-03intel/microcode.h: Fix typo in comment: micr*o*codePaul Menzel
Introduced in commit »intel microcode: split up microcode loading stages« (98ffb426) [1]. [1] http://review.coreboot.org/2778 Change-Id: I626508b10f3998b43aaabd49853090b36f5d3eb0 Signed-off-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2992 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-03-19intel microcode: split up microcode loading stagesAaron Durbin
This patch only applies to CONFIG_MICROCODE_IN_CBFS. The intel microcode update routine would always walk the CBFS for the microcode file. Then it would loop through the whole file looking for a match then load the microcode. This process was maintained for intel_update_microcode_from_cbfs(), however 2 new functions were exported: 1. const void *intel_microcode_find(void) 2. void intel_microcode_load_unlocked(const void *microcode_patch) The first locates a matching microcode while the second loads that mircocode. These new functions can then be used to cache the found microcode blob w/o having to re-walk the CBFS. Booted baskingridge board to Linux and noted that all microcode revisions match on all the CPUs. Change-Id: Ifde3f3e5c100911c4f984dd56d36664a8acdf7d5 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2778 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-09-05buildsystem: Make CPU microcode updating more configurableAlexandru Gagniuc
This patch aims to improve the microcode in CBFS handling that was brought by the last patches from Stefan and the Chromium team. Choices in Kconfig - 1) Generate microcode from tree (default) - 2) Include external microcode file - 3) Do not put microcode in CBFS The idea is to give the user full control over including non-free blobs in the final ROM image. MICROCODE_INCLUDE_PATH Kconfig variable is eliminated. Microcode is handled by a special class, cpu_microcode, as such: cpu_microcode-y += microcode_file.c MICROCODE_IN_CBFS should, in the future, be eliminated. Right now it is needed by intel microcode updating. Once all intel cpus are converted to cbfs updating, this variable can go away. These files are then compiled and assembled into a binary CBFS file. The advantage of doing it this way versus the current method is that 1) The rule is CPU-agnostic 2) Gives user more control over if and how to include microcode blobs 3) The rules for building the microcode binary are kept in src/cpu/Makefile.inc, and thus would not clobber the other makefiles, which are already overloaded and very difficult to navigate. Change-Id: I38d0c9851691aa112e93031860e94895857ebb76 Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1245 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Anton Kochkov <anton.kochkov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2012-07-24Add code to read Intel microcode from CBFSVadim Bendebury
When CONFIG_MICROCODE_IN_CBFS is enabled, find the microcode blob in CBFS and pass it to intel_update_microcode() instead of using the compiled in array. CBFS accesses in pre-RAM and 'normal' environments are provided through different API. Change-Id: I35c1480edf87e550a7b88c4aadf079cf3ff86b5d Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1296 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2012-04-26Revamp Intel microcode update codeStefan Reinauer
- add GPLv2 + copyright header after talking to Ron - "bits" in struct microcode served no real purpose but getting its address taken. Hence drop it - use asm volatile instead of __asm__ volatile - drop superfluous wrmsr (that seems to be harmless but is still wrong) in read_microcode_rev - use u32 instead of unsigned int where appropriate - make code usable both in bootblock and in ramstage - drop ROMCC style print_debug statements - drop microcode update copy in Sandybridge bootblock Change-Id: Iec4d5c7bfac210194caf577e8d72446e6dfb4b86 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/928 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2009-01-20fix compiler warnings (trivial)Stefan Reinauer
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3878 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2004-10-14- Renamed cpu header filesEric Biederman
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@1659 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1