summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/mainboard/google/snow/devicetree.cb
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-09-25snow: Rename snow to daisy.Gabe Black
The name snow goes by in many places in chromeos is daisy. Snow is technically a variant of daisy and should really be called daisy_snow, but for historical reasons the daisy board with no variant was used instead. To make it easier to work with within chromeos, this change renames the snow board to daisy. Change-Id: I569b31bf417db55be91832f15271bea4bc30f163 Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/183553 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 13f24d967251c18dce2a00bcea915f448c4c6aa7) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6929 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2014-08-26armv7: Move Exynos from 'cpu' to 'soc'.Hung-Te Lin
The Exynos family and most ARM products are SoC, not just CPU. We used to put ARM code in src/cpu to avoid polluting the code base for what was essentially an experiment at the time. Now that it's past the experimental phase and we're going to see more SoCs (including intel/baytrail) in coreboot. Change-Id: I5ea1f822664244edf5f77087bc8018d7c535f81c Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170891 Tested-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit c8bb8fe0b20be37465f93c738d80e7e43033670a) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6739 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2014-08-25intel/gma: Clarify code and use dedicated init for Google PeppyRonald G. Minnich
Peppy had some issues with FUI. We decided it was time to create peppy-specific gma.c and i915io.c files. Using yabel and the i915tool, we generated a replay attack, then interpolated against the slippy i915io.c to get something working. Also, in preparation for moving code out of the mainboard gma.c to generic driver code, we got rid of some hardcodes in the mainboard gma.c that have no business being there. The worst were the computation of gmch_[m,n] and it turns out that we had some long-standing bugs related to confusion about 'bpp'. I've killed the word bpp everywhere I could because there are at least 3 things that correspond to bpp. We now have framebuffer, pipe, and panel bpp. The names are long because I want to avoid all the mistakes we've all been making in the last year :-) Sadly, that means a lot of changes not just peppy-related, but they are simple and in a good cause. The test pattern generation is driven by a global variable in mainboard/peppy/gma.c. I've found in the past that it's very useful to have a function like this available, as one can activate it while using a jtag debugger: halt at the right place in ramstage, set the variable to 1, continue. It's not enough code to worry about always including. The last hard-codes for M and N registers are gone, and the function to set from generic intel_dp.c code works. To avoid screen trash on a dev mode boot, which we liked but nobody else did :-), we now take the time to put a pleasing background color that sort of doubles as a power LED. Rough timing is ramstage start is at 2.2, and dev setup is done at 3.3. These new platforms are depressingly slow to boot. Rom init alone is taking 1.9 seconds. 13 years ago it was 3 seconds from power on to bash prompt. These CPUs are at least 10x faster and take much longer to get going. Future work, once we get this through, is to move more functions to the intel driver, and combine the mainboard i915io.c into the mainboard gma.c. That separation only existed because i915io.c was generated by a tool, and it had lots of ugliness. Most ugliness is gone. Old-Change-Id: I6a6295b423a41e263f82cef33eacb92a14163321 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/170013 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Commit-Queue: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Tested-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan.m.shaikh@gmail.com> (cherry picked from commit 8cdaf73e3602e15925859866714db4d5ec6c947d) snow: Fix a typo in devicetree.cb that was breaking the snow build. A typo in a recent change broke the snow build. Old-Change-Id: I93074e68eb3d21510d974fd8e9c63b3947285afd Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171014 Reviewed-by: Ronald Minnich <rminnich@chromium.org> Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> (cherry picked from commit 154876c126a6690930141df178485658533096d2) Squashed a fix into the initial patch and updated nehalem/gma.c to have a non-static gtt_poll. Change-Id: I2f4342c610d87335411da1d6d405171dc80c1f14 Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6657 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2014-08-12exynos5: Refactor board-specific parts out of USB PHY codeJulius Werner
This patch moves around some of the existing Exynos5 USB 2.0 PHY code to make it cleaner in preparation of the 3.0 PHYs. It moves the VBUS GPIOs (which are completely board-specific) into the mainboard code and makes sure to only initialize PHYs on the boards that actually need them. It also removes the USB 3.0 PLL hack that was needed on Snow from the Pit and Kirby boards (which do not have that PLL anymore). Change-Id: Ia35f47a765acff60481f0907f7448ec4f78e0937 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/66887 Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> (cherry picked from commit c3b1a8b687b535f4d5ac1b3bd2a4760151698fdb) Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6609 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-07-10Exynos5250: Initialize USB PHYStefan Reinauer
... this is needed for libpayload to talk to USB devices. Change-Id: I7eb19003c9e96efb5fa7a3f97c7b15f3ef332687 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3696 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-07-10ARMv7: De-uboot-ify Exynos5250 codeStefan Reinauer
When starting the Exynos5250 port, a lot of unneeded u-boot code was imported. This is an attempt to get rid of a lot of unneeded code before the port is used as a basis for further ARM ports. There is a lot more that can be done, including cleaning up the 5250's Kconfig file. Change-Id: I2d88676c436eea4b21bcb62f40018af9fabb3016 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3642 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-07-10Wield battle axe at ARM portStefan Reinauer
This patch unfortunately incorporates a number of changes, all of which are making future ARM ports easier. - drop cruft that came in with u-boot - move serial console from mainboard Kconfig to Exynos Kconfig - factor out non-board specific wakeup code - move generic bootblock code from mainboard to Exynos - actually call arch_cpu_init() - remove dead code - fix up copyright messages - remove snow_ prefix from a lot of code to reduce the noise when creating a new mainboard based on that code. Change-Id: Ic05326edf5a7e1a691c5ff841a604cb9e351b562 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3640 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-04-10GOOGLE/SNOW: clean up the device treeRonald G. Minnich
This is a simpler device tree that is also more correct, and has graphics settings as well. Change-Id: I342d8be7dddb76e6992876c73f5c625c926977d3 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3053 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-04-05exynos5-common: get rid of displayport trial codeRonald G. Minnich
This was a first pass at display port support, we have realized that it was ultimately a bad path. The display hardware is intimately tied into a specific cpu and mainboard combination, and the code has to be elsewhere. The devicetree formatting is ugly, but it matters not: it's changing soon. Change-Id: Iddce54f9e7219a7569315565fac65afbbe0edd29 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3029 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-03-26Revert "samsung/exynos5: add resource functions for the display port"David Hendricks
This reverts commit 9427ca151e44644238b1b52138894195a9f5175f Looks like we were a bit too anxious to see this one get in. The devicetree.cb change seems to have broken things. coreboot memory table: 0. 0000000050000000-000000005000ffff: RESERVED 1. 00000000bff00000-00000000bfffffff: CONFIGURATION TABLES 2. 0000014004000000-00000140044007ff: RESERVED Before this patch: coreboot memory table: 0. 0000000040000000-00000000bfefffff: RAM 1. 00000000bff00000-00000000bfffffff: CONFIGURATION TABLES Change-Id: I618e4f1976265d56cfd6a61d0c5736c55a0f3cec Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2914 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
2013-03-26samsung/exynos5: add resource functions for the display portRonald G. Minnich
This does NOT turn on the graphics. The device tree has been changed enough so that, at the very least, the correct functions are called at the correct time, with the correct paramaters. We decided to yank the I2C entries as they did not obvious function and might not even have been correct. Not working, seemingly, but we need to add a 4M resource for memory, and it seems it needs to be fixed at the address shown. This address was chosen from current hardware. We realized that the display code should be part of the cpu -- that's how the hardware works! Change-Id: Ied65a554f833566be817540702f79a02e7b6cb6e Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2615 Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-03-06samsung/exynos5: add display port and framebuffer defines and initializationRonald G. Minnich
These are essential functions for setting up the display port and framebuffer, and also enable such things as aux channel communications. We do some very simple initialization in romstage, mainly set a GPIO so that the graphics is powering up, but the complex parts are done in the ramstage. This mirrors the way in which graphics is done in the x86 size. I've added a first pass at a real device, and put it in the mainboard Kconfig, hoping for corrections. Because startup is so complex, depending on device type, I've created a 'displayport' device that removes some of the complexity and makes the flow *much* clearer. You can actually follow the flow by looking at the code, which is not true on other implementations. Since display port is perhaps the main port used on these chips, that's a reasonable compromise. All parameters of importance are now in the device tree. Change-Id: I56400ec9016ecb8716ec5a5dae41fdfbfff4817a Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2570 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2013-02-19snow: add cpu_cluster and domain resources via devicetree.cbDavid Hendricks
This patch will cause the resource allocator to actually set aside the memory resources using methods in the previous patch. The coreboot table output will include "RAM" entries (there were none before): coreboot memory table: 0. 0000000040400000-00000000bff001ff: RAM 1. 00000000bff00200-00000000bff00fff: CONFIGURATION TABLES 2. 00000000bff01000-00000000bfffffff: RAM Change-Id: I5cd76e93fc232fdae1754253efb4e9269b3a20c0 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2420 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2012-12-12Add minimal mainboard support for snowRonald G. Minnich
This is the minimal set of sources that allow the board to build. These need to be filled in with actual code. But if we get these in upstream we can stop working against a WIP patch. Change-Id: I9347a573bb40761f6a12be3ee8febe3ca4be55a3 Signed-off-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2018 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)