| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
x201 has 2 sata ports. 1 port for hard drive and 1 port for the dock.
Tested on x201 with hdd in port 1 + cdrom in port 2.
Change-Id: I1ee8c547392257d4f2e00a5d48e21447a84f79c0
Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8657
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se>
|
|
Keep only the last one: it was the one which was really used.
Change-Id: I19132f6224d6847e615e3c582aaa6e66b0d56c7a
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7677
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
|
|
On those chipsets the pins are just a legacy concept. Real interrupts are
messages on corresponding busses or some internal logic of chipset.
Hence interrupt routing isn't anymore board-specific (dependent on layout) but
depends only on configuration.
Rather than attempting to sync real config, ACPI and legacy descriptors, just
use the same interrupt routing per chipset covering all possible devices.
The only part which remains board-specific are LPC and PCI interrupts.
Interrupt balancing may suffer from such merge but:
a) Doesn't seem to be the case of this map on current systems
b) Almost all OS use MSI nowadays bypassing this stuff completely
c) If we want a good balancing we need to take into account that e.g.
wlan card may be placed in a different slot and so would require complicated
balancing on runtime. It's difficult to maintain with almost no benefit.
Change-Id: I9f63d1d338c5587ebac7a52093e5b924f6e5ca2d
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7130
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
This implementation is more compact, unified and works with windows as well.
Tested under windows and under Debian GNU/Linux.
Change-Id: I585dec12e17e22d829baa3f2dc7aecc174f9d3b5
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7296
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Change-Id: Ibb4dcc4356876f6385e79c10d8296fb680937827
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7201
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Change-Id: I80b7facfb9cc9f642dd1c766884dc23da1aab2c8
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6800
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7332eeed244877252074e661f1c256a69a9b428a
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6482
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
Change-Id: I5b0399a8edca3b73aa7d515d2c446c31b3239fa5
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5239
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Old video init just replayed the sequence.
This one actually computes the values.
Change-Id: Ic1fe7a2e90dc2cc36ac0d8bcea5cfabc583f09a3
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5270
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I90c6ff14ab819368ccc874008a7fb1410a543984
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5255
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
EEPROM/RFID chip present in thinkpad should be locked in a way to avoid
any potential RFID access.
Read serial number, UUID and P/N from EEPROM.
This info is stored on AT24RF08 chip acessible through SMBUS.
Change-Id: Ia3e766d90a094f63c8c854cd37e165221ccd8acd
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4774
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Rudolf Marek <r.marek@assembler.cz>
|
|
Change-Id: Ieefc2ad775c16de9aa974b2602d55ee047c9f568
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4643
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
Without them PMH7 is inaccessible from running system.
Change-Id: Ib5a524325040e253a9d914906f90263fc208c313
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4655
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
Change-Id: I6652e0ad4e0179950f775bbd0200484907bfc976
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4653
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
They're pretty annoying.
Change-Id: I44d26dc168927a9cedfd6ecc4c9a51a3a7b362c7
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4662
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
Ability to choose compatibility mode is interesting for testing payloads and
OS for compatibility with older systems.
As per comments
"ide_legacy_combined # TODO: Does nothing since
generations, remove from sb code?"
The "combined" mode was removed. It wasn't used by any mobo and the code for
it is almost identical to IDE one other than few bits relating to interrupt
handling and ISA mode.
Change-Id: I407a8fac753b513812a86bef5abcf39c6d81472e
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4658
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
wwan_enable was never used.
wlan_enable isn't something for device tree but for CMOS config if at all.
Change-Id: I765d9d6f0b73b7dc5a57c0c630a53b4b7a0b48cb
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4651
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Was extensively tested on my X201.
More info on the wiki
Change-Id: I503d77749780422e446b48224ca98a1f22a2c180
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4514
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
