| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Because we had no stack on romcc boards, we had a separate, not as
powerful clone of printk: print_*. Back in the day, like more than
half a decade ago, we migrated a lot of boards to printk, but we never
cleaned up the existing code to be consistent. instead, we worked around
the problem with a very messy console.h (nowadays the mess is hidden in
romstage_console.c and early_print.h)
This patch cleans up the northbridge code to use printk() on all non-ROMCC
boards.
Change-Id: I4a36cd965c58aae65d74ce1e697dc0d0f58f47a1
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7856
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Currently due to enum mistake DDR3 = 0xb was confused with DIMM type and
interpreted as LRDIMM, considered unregistered and so every RAM was
unregistered.
Registered RAM is rarely used, so I suppose the code was never tested with them.
For unregistered RAM exactly the same codepath is followed.
Change-Id: I02fe8b1fd7be3bd382399ffa0eb513965a2a6d77
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7687
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
The objective here is to tighten coreboot up a bit by not repeating
common helpers. This makes the code base more consistent and
unified/tight.
Change-Id: Ia163eae68b4a84a00ed118125e70308fab1cea0c
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6215
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
Some size_ts were considered long int and some compilers
are picky about that.
Change-Id: I671daa18eb3bfa2a7defc120e77bbb1ef72bd417
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5788
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Clean up superfluous line terminators.
Change-Id: If837b4f1b3e7702cbb09ba12f53ed788a8f31386
Signed-off-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4562
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Change-Id: I2dd693b300085493baa65bb652df8d6cce80b63b
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3431
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
The VX900 can be connected to either DDR2 or DDR3. On my board, it is
DDR3, hence why there is no and will be no DDR2 code from my side.
This is the raminit for DDR3 dimms for the VX900. I like the term
"raminit" better than "memory training". This is a device, not a dog.
What works and what doesn't is documented in the code. It does not
make sense to hide that information in a commit message.
Change-Id: Ib2ebc10e6d4d22d0a937fe9e895c17ce79153c88
Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3417
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
