Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
In some case where the flash space is limited or when a large payload such as LinuxBoot
is used, the RO region may not be large enough to contain all components that would
normally be added.
This patch adds the possibility to add specific components to the RW regions only in
the same way as the RO_ONLY_SUPPORT does for the RO region.
Please note: this applies only to the items that would normally be added to all regions.
If the payload is directed to the RW region only, a recovery payload needs to be added
to the RO region manually.
BUG=N/A
TEST=build
Change-Id: Ie0df9b5dfc6df4f24efc5582a1aec9ecfb48c44d
Signed-off-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36544
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
With this change cbfs_boot_locate will check the RO (COREBOOT) region if
a file can not be found in the active RW region. By doing so it is not
required to duplicate static files that are not intended to be updated
to the RW regions.
The coreboot image can still be updated by adding the file to the RW
region.
This change is intended to support VBOOT on systems with a small flash
device.
BUG=N/A
TEST=tested on facebook fbg1701
Change-Id: I81ceaf927280cef9a3f09621c796c451e9115211
Signed-off-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36545
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I417a2ff45b4a8f5bc800459a64f1c5a861fcd3d5
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36605
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
|
|
When prog_locate() is called in the stage VBOOT is starting from and the
image to be loaded is not the target image vboot_prepare() may be called
too early.
To prevent this vboot_prepare() is removed from the vboot_locator
structure. This allows more control over the start of the vboot logic.
To clarify the change the vboot_prepare() has been renamed to
vboot_run_logic() and calls to initialize vboot have been added at the
following places:
postcar_loader: when VBOOT starts in ROMSTAGE
romstage_loader: when VBOOT starts in BOOTBLOCK
ramstage_loader: when VBOOT starts in ROMSTAGE
BUG=N/A
TEST=tested on facebook fbg1701
Change-Id: Id5e8fd78458c09dd3896bfd142bd49c2c3d686df
Signed-off-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36543
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: If6b5930f78c3da6dcefaa7b6202cd0424a24525b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36331
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I3d90e46ed391ce323436750c866a0afc3879e2e6
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36359
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
* Add cbfsoption --ibb to mark files as IBB
* Will be used by "Legacy FIT TXT" boot
Change-Id: I83313f035e7fb7e1eb484b323862522e28cb73d4
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31497
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
|
|
Required for new VB2_ASSERT and VB2_DIE macros in vboot code.
(See chromium:972956.)
BUG=b:124141368, chromium:1005700
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I61a1036ccab80862d6eb12f9f72286f29e8478cf
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36035
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
The HWID in vboot GBB is an identifier for machine model. On Chrome OS,
that should be provisioned in manufacturing process (by collecting real
hardware information), and will be checked in system startup.
For bring up developers, they usually prefer to generate a test-only
string for HWID. However that format was not well documented and cause
problems. Further more, most Chromebooks are using HWID v3+ today while
the test-only HWID is usually v2. Non-Chrome OS developers may also
prefer their own format.
To simplify development process, the GBB_CONFIG now defaults to empty
string, and will be replaced by a board-specific test-only v2 HWID
automatically. Developers can still override that in mainboard Kconfig
if they prefer v3 or other arbitrary format.
BUG=b:140067412
TEST=Built 'kukui' successfully. Removed kukui GBB config and built
again, still seeing correct test HWID.
Change-Id: I0cda17a374641589291ec8dfb1d66c553f7cbf35
Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35634
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
With the support of various algorithms and banks in tlcl_extend(),
digest_algo parameter of tpm_extend_pcr() started defining the target
PCR bank in TPM2 case.
The OS expects coreboot to extend the SHA256 bank of BOOT_MODE_PCR.
The value that the OS expects coreboot to extend into BOOT_MODE_PCR
is the SHA1 digest of mode bits extended to the length of SHA256 digest
by appending zero bytes.
Thus the correct value for digest_algo passed into tpm_extend_pcr() for
BOOT_MODE_PCR is TPM_ALG_SHA256.
This didn't matter until adding the support for multiple digest introduced
by patches like https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33252, as
tlcl_extend always used SHA256 bank before.
Change-Id: I834fec24023cd10344cc359117f00fc80c61b80c
Signed-off-by: Andrey Pronin <apronin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35476
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ibaeda2762c733fdbe48979b635cc0cfd7ee4295d
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35387
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Fastboot support in vboot_reference is unused, unmaintained, and
produces compile errors when enabled. Since there is no current
or planned use cases for fastboot, remove it.
BUG=b:124141368, chromium:995172
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I06ea816ffb910163ec2c3c456b3c09408c806d0b
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35002
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
To make explicit when vboot2 error codes should be returned,
use the new vb2_error_t type on all functions which return
VB2_ERROR_* constants.
Additionally, add required vboot submodule commit id e6700f4c:
2019-07-31 14:12:30 +0800 - (vboot: update vboot2 functions to use new vb2_error_t)
NOTE: This patch was merged separately on the Chromium tree:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1728499
BUG=b:124141368, chromium:988410
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I804c2b407e496d0c8eb9833be629b7c40118415c
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Cq-Depend: chromium:1728292
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34860
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Previously, the initial value for secdatak was embedded
in secdata_tpm.c as a uint8_t array. Switch to using
vb2api_secdatak_create instead, and write the value in
ctx->secdatak.
Remove an unnecessary call to vb2api_secdata_create in
_factory_initialize_tpm.
BUG=b:124141368, chromium:972956
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
TEST=Check that size and value of initial secdatak
has not changed. Apply the patch below and
check for this output:
_factory_initialize_tpm():266: _factory_initialize_tpm: secdatak sizes are identical? 1
_factory_initialize_tpm():269: _factory_initialize_tpm: secdatak values are identical? 1
diff --git a/src/security/vboot/secdata_tpm.c b/src/security/vboot/secdata_tpm.c
index ff62185107..c1818b482f 100644
--- a/src/security/vboot/secdata_tpm.c
+++ b/src/security/vboot/secdata_tpm.c
@@ -148,6 +148,18 @@ static uint32_t write_secdata(uint32_t index,
return TPM_E_CORRUPTED_STATE;
}
+/*
+ * This is derived from rollback_index.h of vboot_reference. see struct
+ * RollbackSpaceKernel for details.
+ */
+static const uint8_t secdata_kernel[] = {
+ 0x02,
+ 0x4C, 0x57, 0x52, 0x47,
+ 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
+ 0x00, 0x00, 0x00,
+ 0xE8,
+};
+
/*
* This is used to initialize the TPM space for recovery hash after defining
* it. Since there is no data available to calculate hash at the point where TPM
@@ -250,6 +262,11 @@ static uint32_t _factory_initialize_tpm(struct vb2_context *ctx)
* indication that TPM factory initialization was successfully
* completed.
*/
+ VBDEBUG("%s: secdatak sizes are identical? %d\n", __func__,
+ sizeof(secdata_kernel) == sizeof(ctx->secdatak));
+ VBDEBUG("%s: secdatak values are identical? %d\n", __func__,
+ memcmp(secdata_kernel, ctx->secdatak,
+ sizeof(secdata_kernel)) == 0);
RETURN_ON_FAILURE(set_kernel_space(ctx->secdatak));
if (CONFIG(VBOOT_HAS_REC_HASH_SPACE))
@@ -452,7 +469,7 @@ uint32_t antirollback_read_space_firmware(struct vb2_context *ctx)
/* Read the firmware space. */
rv = read_space_firmware(ctx);
- if (rv == TPM_E_BADINDEX) {
+ if (true) {
/*
* This seems the first time we've run. Initialize the TPM.
*/
Change-Id: I74261453df6cc55ef3f38d8fb922bcc604084c0a
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Cq-Depend: chromium:1652874, chromium:1655049
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33386
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
vboot_setup_tpm returns (TPM_SUCCESS == 0) on success.
In this case, call antirollback_read_space_firmware.
This regression was introduced in CB:34510.
BUG=b:139101213
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: Ifdea1d85167a50a1ada5afe9b107408e3a2e0d6f
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34790
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronak Kanabar <ronak.kanabar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: V Sowmya <v.sowmya@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: caveh jalali <caveh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Add support for Intel PTT. For supporting Intel PTT we need to disable
read and write access to the TPM NVRAM during the bootblock. TPM NVRAM
will only be available once the DRAM is initialized. To circumvent this,
we mock secdata if HAVE_INTEL_PTT is set. The underlying problem is,
that the iTPM only supports a stripped down instruction set while the
Intel ME is not fully booted up. Details can be found in Intel document
number 571993 - Paragraph 2.10.
Change-Id: I08c9a839f53f96506be5fb68f7c1ed5bf6692505
Signed-off-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34510
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
This reverts commit 598af2e2c2785c00eb4290cdcefe1082b2a6f858.
Reason for revert: This commit breaks every board with VBOOT enabled
if the platform is apollolake, broadwell, skylake, baswell, baytrails
or icelake. The reason is, that the SoC selects
VBOOT_MUST_REQUEST_DISPLAY by default, and this has a dependency now
on VBOOT_MAY_SKIP_DISPLAY_INIT. This will only be auto-selected if
it is a CHROMEOS platform.
Change-Id: I3872d9aa993326ded135d8a5d950d5b1b1eddf34
Signed-off-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34308
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Relocate call to vboot_save_recovery_reason_vbnv and rename
vb2_clear_recovery_reason_vbnv for consistency.
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I111cc23cf3d4b16fdb058dd395ac17a97f23a53f
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33551
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
vboot_handoff is no longer used in coreboot, and is not
needed in CBMEM or cbtable.
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753
TEST=make clean && make runtests
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I782d53f969dc9ae2775e3060371d06e7bf8e1af6
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33536
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This config option, when set, will allow the platform to skip display
initialization in normal (non-developer, non-recovery) mode. This allows
platforms that do not implement firmware UI in normal mode to skip the
display init in firmware.
TEST=Set option CONFIG_VBOOT and clear CONFIG_VBOOT_MAY_SKIP_DISPLAY_INIT
and the display should initialize in ramstage when platform boots. Set
CONFIG_VBOOT and set CONFIG_VBOOT_MAY_SKIP_DISPLAY_INIT and the display
initialization should be skipped in coreboot.
Signed-off-by: Sukerkar, Amol N <amol.n.sukerkar@intel.com>
Change-Id: Icadad6da34dcb817af02868e89a94ea62dbfa7b3
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33844
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
When we added CONFIG_VBOOT_MIGRATE_WORKING_DATA, the idea was that on
some Arm platforms the original working data buffer was in SRAM, which
stays accessbile for the whole runtime of the system. There is no reason
to migrate it into CBMEM on those platforms because ramstage and the
payload could continue to access it in SRAM.
Now that we've had a couple of months of experience with this option, we
found that most of our Arm platforms have some issue that requires
migrating anyway, because BL31 often claims SRAM for itself and makes it
inaccessible to the payload. On the remaining platforms, accessing SRAM
from the payload is possible but still an issue, because libpayload
doesn't have enough memory layout information to set up proper page
tables for it, so we're accessing it uncached and at risk of alignment
errors.
Rather than having to figure out how to map the right SRAM range for
every platform in the payload, let's just get rid of the option.
memcpy()ing 12KB isn't worth this much hassle.
Change-Id: I1b94e01c998f723c8950be4d12cc8f02b363a1bf
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33952
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
|
|
Depthcharge no longer reads this data structure, and uses
the vboot workbuf in vboot_working_data instead.
Since vboot2 downstream migration is not yet completed, the
vboot2 -> vboot1 migration code is still required, but has
been relocated to depthcharge.
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753
TEST=make clean && make runtests
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I769abbff79695b38d11fb6a93c2b42f64d4bafde
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33535
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I3b5ca272abffe46c6a63251cf4905780f87a6836
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33540
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Logging and clearing the recovery mode switch doesn't have
anything to do with vboot_handoff. Move it to the main verstage
logic file.
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I2e74f3893463e43fe5fad4a8df8036560f34e0db
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33534
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
These functions are no longer used and may be removed:
* vboot_handoff_check_recovery_flag
* vboot_get_handoff_flag
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: Ie05652ef1288eef74bd2e7e8bea79fd29d523859
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33533
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Two functions retrieve vboot recovery_reason:
* vboot_handoff_get_recovery_reason
* vboot_get_recovery_reason_shared_data
Previously, when CBMEM comes online, a vboot_handoff data
structure is created, and depending on the architecture,
coreboot may eventually lose access to vboot_working_data.
After implementing vboot_working_data CBMEM migration,
vboot_working_data is always guaranteed to be accessible.
vboot_get_recovery_reason_shared_data is corrected to also
allow accessing vboot_working_data in ramstage and postcar.
Now, vboot_handoff_get_recovery reason returning a valid recovery
reason implies that vboot_get_recovery_reason_shared_data should
*also* return a valid recovery reason. Thus we may remove the
former.
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: Iac216dc968dd155d9d4f8bd0f2dfd5034762f9a0
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33532
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Recovery path should finalize work context, and trim
vboot_working_data buffer_size. Otherwise, depthcharge ingests
the full 12 KB workbuf in recovery path.
BUG=chromium:972528, b:134893812
TEST=Build with vboot_reference CL:1584488. Check that USB disks
are properly verified in recovery path.
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: Icf2600d2eb5d846a26aec35a153946dd2f7f128c
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33358
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Add a new post code, POST_INVALID_ROM, used when coreboot fails to
locate or validate a resource that is stored in ROM.
BUG=b:124401932
BRANCH=sarien
TEST=build coreboot for sarien and arcada platforms
Change-Id: Ie6de6590595d8fcdc57ad156237fffa03d5ead38
Signed-off-by: Keith Short <keithshort@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32770
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
Display is required by recovery mode. Determine display init
before recovery check.
BUG=b:133197727,b:133175864
TEST=enter recovery mode, checked the display shows up
Signed-off-by: Eric Lai <ericr_lai@compal.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: Id6ac611f51241373bca3e2b394a94dcd52d3fde7
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32906
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
vboot_measure_cbfs_hook() is included when CONFIG_VBOOT_MEASURED_BOOT
is enabled, but this function is defined as 0 in vboot_crtm.h using ENV_
Remove ENV_ for vboot_measure_cbfs_hook() function definition.
This function is added to bootblock stage also.
BUG=NA
TEST=Build Google Banon and Google Cyan
Change-Id: Ic62c18db09c119dfb85340a6b7f36bfd148aaa45
Signed-off-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32532
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Save whether or not vboot has selected developer mode as a flag
in vboot_working_data. Other coreboot code may access this flag
without needing to consult vboot_handoff (which is in the process
of being deprecated).
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: Ieb6ac4937c943aea78ddc762595a05387d2b8114
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32843
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
As of CL:1605641, vboot2 code should be used for setting and
checking display init state. Remove all vboot1 OPROM-related
code, and use the vboot2 display init code which has already
been added in previous commits.
coreboot should not be reading vboot NVRAM flags directly.
Remove the function vboot_wants_oprom(), and instead rely on
display_init_required(), which uses the
VBOOT_WD_FLAG_DISPLAY_INIT value stored in
vboot_working_data.flags, initialized during verstage.
Note that this means in the case of CONFIG_VBOOT=y, the return
value of display_init_required() can only be trusted after
verstage has been executed. This should not be a problem
assuming that all display initialization occurs in ramstage.
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, chromium:948529
TEST=Build locally
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: Ic8f9dc5a3c7f1546a8fed82bde02be4d04568f8d
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Cq-Depend: chromium:1605641, chromium:1605525
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32723
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Verified Boot OPROM code is being refactored. OPROM is being
generalized into "display initialization". As such, the NVRAM
request flag is being renamed from OPROM_NEEDED to
DISPLAY_REQUEST.
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, chromium:948529
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I74374abf7d1deb594c073f7a4a76c9de46092143
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Cq-Depend: chromium:1605640
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32720
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
This patch moves vboot_logic_executed() (and its dependencies) into a
header and turns it into a static inline function. The function is used
to guard larger amounts of code in several places, so this should allow
us to save some more space through compile-time elimination (and also
makes it easier to avoid undefined reference issues in some cases).
Change-Id: I193f608882cbfe07dc91ee90d02fafbd67a3c324
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32716
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
|
|
This patch adds another check to vboot_logic_executed() to make sure we
only do a runtime check for verstage_should_load() if
CONFIG_VBOOT_RETURN_FROM_VERSTAGE is enabled. That's the only case where
the stage that's loading the verstage can execute after verification has
run (because the verstage will return to it when it's done). In the
other case, the stage that loads verstage really just loads it and will
never do anything again after hand-off, so it's guaranteed to always
execute before verification.
This change may allow extra dead-code elimination in some cases.
Change-Id: I7019b6f7b0acfbf0a8173914b53364751b08f2cf
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32714
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Should include vb2_sha.h header when SHA library functions or
constants are required. This replaces NEED_VB2_SHA_LIBRARY.
BUG=b:124141368, chromium:956474
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I9f32174dbf3de05fbe5279cb8017888757abf368
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Cq-Depend: chromium:1583820
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32454
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Input: tell vb2api_fw_phase1 if display unconditionally available
Output: vb2api_fw_phase1 may request coreboot to initialize
display, if needed based on some internal request
Move setting the VBOOT_FLAG_DISPLAY_REQUESTED flag into
verstage_main.
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, chromium:948529
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I81c82c46303564b63b8a32e7f80beb9d891a4628
Cq-Depend: chromium:1564232
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32324
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
The VbInitParams struct will be deprecated. Remove its
use in preparation.
Additionally, remove use of the flag
VB_INIT_OUT_ENABLE_USB_STORAGE, which is no longer used
downstream since vboot_reference CL:347257.
BUG=b:124141368, chromium:960226
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: Ibe02cb6ba639de0d7cbdf79fc4dbf49044c92278
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Cq-Depend: chromium:1583943
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32664
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Remove use of deprecated GoogleBinaryBlockHeader struct, and
replace with vb2_gbb_header.
BUG=b:124141368, chromium:954774
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: Iee3bd877cb1791a689efdeabda324f43f7d0c6f2
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32455
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
The name OPROM is somewhat inaccurate, since other steps to bring
up display and graphics are needed depending on mainboard/SoC.
This patch cleans up OPROM code nomenclature, and works towards
the goal of deprecating vboot1:
* Rename CONFIG_VBOOT_OPROM_MATTERS to
CONFIG_VBOOT_MUST_REQUEST_DISPLAY and clarify Kconfig
description
* Remove function vboot_handoff_skip_display_init
* Remove use of the VbInit oflag VB_INIT_OUT_ENABLE_DISPLAY
* Add |flags| field to vboot_working_data struct
* Create VBOOT_FLAG_DISPLAY_REQUESTED and set in vboot_handoff
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, chromium:948529
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
TEST=build and flash eve device; attempt loading dev/rec modes
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: Idf111a533c3953448b4b9084885a9a65a2432a8b
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32262
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
NEED_VB20_INTERNALS should always be specified when peeking
into vboot internal data structures.
BUG=b:124141368, chromium:956474
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I5a47a28350fd5a68efeff0d06ca150c1ae145412
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32452
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ib843eb7144b7dc2932931b9e8f3f1d816bcc1e1a
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/26796
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: David Guckian
|
|
The value of "write protect" GPIO shall be read in depthcharge,
and the flag shall be set there instead.
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, chromium:1556855
TEST=Build locally
CQ-DEPEND=CL:1556855
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I4d24a057b1385244a836a67c565ee6726a894fdc
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32234
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I23bc0191ca8fcd88364e5c08be7c90195019e399
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32012
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: David Guckian
|
|
This option is duplicated in depthcharge:
https://crrev.com/c/1545144
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, chromium:943150
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
CQ-DEPEND=CL:1545144
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I48e20ad21cdcb948a23387d3e5fcf142723b0c82
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32135
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
This patch enables CONFIG_VBOOT_OPROM_MATTERS in a few more cases where
I think(?) it should be. Haswell, Broadwell and Baytrail Chromebooks
have this enabled in their old depthcharge firmware branches -- we
presumably just forgot to move it over when vboot2 migrated the option
to coreboot. Braswell didn't, but it seems like this requirement was
added when it was migrated to FSP 1.1...? (Not very sure about that one,
but it does call load_vbt() right now which executes things based on
display_init_required().) Additionally, it seems to make sense to enable
it whenever the user explicitly selects VGA_ROM_RUN in menuconfig (like
one of the Intel defconfigs does).
Once we have all this, one could take a step back and ask whether this
option still makes sense at all anymore. It's enabled for almost all
devices (that work with vboot at all), it will presumably be enabled for
all future devices, and it seems that most devices that don't enable it
use libgfxinit, which as far as I can tell isn't gated on
display_init_required() but probably should be. Realistically, whatever
kind of display init a board needs to do (native or option ROM), it's
probably expensive enough that it's worth skipping on a normal mode
vboot boot, and we'd want to have this enabled by default on everything
except boards that actually don't have a display. So maybe we should
flip it around to CONFIG_VBOOT_OPROM_DOESNT_MATTER, but doing that would
probably lead to nobody ever selecting it at all.
Not sure what the best solution there is yet, but I think this patch
at least moves things in the more correct direction.
Change-Id: Id96a88296ddb9cfbb58ea67d93e1638d95570e2c
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32114
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I3b852cae4ef84d257bf1e5486447583bdd16b441
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/29301
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
As part of chromium:942901, physical dev switch functionality
is being deprecated.
This flag is no longer read after CL:1526070, and thus
does not need to be set here.
coreboot's vboot subrepository needs to be updated to include
CL:1526070 before this CL can be merged.
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, chromium:942901
TEST=Build and deploy to eve
TEST=util/lint/checkpatch.pl -g origin/master..HEAD
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
CQ-DEPEND=CL:1526070
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: Ie5849f9e0fcb8e4e6d35d542a141bf635e751af4
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31952
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Currently only two devices make use of physical dev switch:
stumpy, lumpy
Deprecate this switch. If these devices are flashed to ToT,
they may still make use of virtual dev switch, activated
via recovery screen.
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, chromium:942901
TEST=util/lint/checkpatch.pl -g origin/master..HEAD
TEST=util/abuild/abuild -B -e -y -c 50 -p none -x
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I87ec0db6148c1727b95475d94e3e3f6e7ec83193
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31943
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This option is duplicated in depthcharge:
https://crrev.com/c/1524811
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, b:128737909
TEST=Build and deploy to eve
TEST=util/lint/checkpatch.pl -g origin/master..HEAD
TEST=util/abuild/abuild -B -e -y -c 50 -p none -x
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
CQ-DEPEND=CL:1524811
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: Id8c207ec4ad5a476e24eee1ceb9e40f24d55e725
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31926
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|