summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/security
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-05-01security/vboot: Convert reboot-related errors to vboot2-styleYu-Ping Wu
Error codes are renamed as follows: VBERROR_SHUTDOWN_REQUESTED --> VB2_REQUEST_SHUTDOWN VBERROR_REBOOT_REQUIRED --> VB2_REQUEST_REBOOT VBERROR_EC_REBOOT_TO_SWITCH_RW --> VB2_REQUEST_REBOOT_EC_SWITCH_RW VBERROR_EC_REBOOT_TO_RO_REQUIRED --> VB2_REQUEST_REBOOT_EC_TO_RO BRANCH=none BUG=b:124141368, chromium:988410 TEST=emerge-nami coreboot Cq-Depend: chromium:2143030 Change-Id: Id82cf85f49dfb63a9c3d41aacd3969786bffcac7 Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40749 Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-04-28vboot: Always build secdata functions for romstageJulius Werner
Since CB:40389, all platforms with CONFIG_VBOOT_EARLY_EC_SYNC need to write back secdata in romstage. Those platforms currently all happen to have CONFIG_VBOOT_SEPARATE_VERSTAGE set as well, but there's no official dependency between those options. Change the Makefile to unconditionally build the secdata access routines for romstage so that this would work on other platforms as well. Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Change-Id: I0b3c79e9bb8af9d09ef91f5749953ca109dd2a40 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40760 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2020-04-28security/lockdown: Write-protect WP_ROPatrick Rudolph
Allow to write protect only the WP_RO region in case of enabled VBOOT. One can either lock the boot device in VERSTAGE early if VBOOT is enabled, or late in RAMSTAGE. Both options have their downsides as explained below. Lock early if you don't trust the code that's stored in the writeable flash partition. This prevents write-protecting the MRC cache, which is written in ramstage. In case the contents of the MRC cache are corrupted this can lead to system instability or trigger unwanted code flows inside the firmware. Lock late if you trust the code that's stored in the writeable flash partition. This allows write-protecting the MRC cache, but if a vulnerability is found in the code of the writeable partition an attacker might be able to overwrite the whole flash as it hasn't been locked yet. Change-Id: I72c3e1a0720514b9b85b0433944ab5fb7109b2a2 Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32705 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
2020-04-28security: Add common boot media write protectionPatrick Rudolph
Introduce boot media protection settings and use the existing boot_device_wp_region() function to apply settings on all platforms that supports it yet. Also remove the Intel southbridge code, which is now obsolete. Every platform locks the SPIBAR in a different stage. For align up with the common mrc cache driver and lock after it has been written to. Tested on Supermicro X11SSH-TF. The whole address space is write-protected. Change-Id: Iceb3ecf0bde5cec562bc62d1d5c79da35305d183 Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32704 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-04-28drivers/spi/tpm: Add support for non CR50 SPI TPM2Patrick Rudolph
Add support for a STM SPI TPM2 by adding checks for CR50. Tested using ST33HTPH2E32. Change-Id: I015497ca078979a44ba2b84e4995493de1f7247b Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39693 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-04-23rules.h: Rename ENV_VERSTAGE to ENV_SEPARATE_VERSTAGEJulius Werner
When CONFIG_SEPARATE_VERSTAGE=n, all verstage code gets linked into the appropriate calling stage (bootblock or romstage). This means that ENV_VERSTAGE is actually 0, and instead ENV_BOOTBLOCK or ENV_ROMSTAGE are 1. This keeps tripping up people who are just trying to write a simple "are we in verstage (i.e. wherever the vboot init logic runs)" check, e.g. for TPM init functions which may run in "verstage" or ramstage depending on whether vboot is enabled. Those checks will not work as intended for CONFIG_SEPARATE_VERSTAGE=n. This patch renames ENV_VERSTAGE to ENV_SEPARATE_VERSTAGE to try to clarify that this macro can really only be used to check whether code is running in a *separate* verstage, and clue people in that they may need to cover the linked-in verstage case as well. Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Change-Id: I2ff3a3c3513b3db44b3cff3d93398330cd3632ea Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40582 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2020-04-23vboot: Add permission check for kernel spaceDaisuke Nojiri
This patch restores the permission check for the kernel space which was dropped when read_space_kernel was moved from Depthcharge by CL:2155429. BUG=chromium:1045217, chromium:1020578 BRANCH=none TEST=none Signed-off-by: dnojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org> Change-Id: If6d487940f39865cadc0ca9d5de6e055ad3e017d Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40579 Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-04-20security/vboot, mb/google: Fix build errorsPatrick Georgi
There have been two cases of incompatibilities between overlapping changes, and they need to be resolved in a single commit to unbreak the tree: 1. CB:40389 introduced a new use of write_secdata while CB:40359 removed that function in favor of safe_write. Follow the refactor of the latter in the code introduced by the former. 2. CB:39849 changed google_chromeec_get_usb_pd_power_info()'s interface and adapted all its users. Except for duffy and kaisa which were only added in CB:40223 and CB:40393 respectively, so reapply the patch to puff's mainboard.c to their mainboard.c files. Change-Id: Ib8dfcd61bb79e0a487eaa60e719bd93561f2d97a Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40518 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com> Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2020-04-20vboot/secdata: remove retries, readback, and CRC checkJoel Kitching
Depthcharge trusts that our TPM driver is working reliably, and so should we. Also remove CRC check -- the value returned by antirollback_read_space_firmware() is dropped in vboot_logic.c verstage_main(), and vboot handles this check internally. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:972956 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I5d3f3823fca8507fd58087bb0f7b78cfa49417ab Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40359 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-04-20vboot: remove leftover TPM_PCR_GBB constantsJoel Kitching
These constants were left behind after the code using them was relocated in CB:34510. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:972956 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I6ce7c969a9e9bdf6cdce3343ba666a08b3521f27 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40358 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-04-17ec_sync: Run EFS2 in romstagednojiri
EFS2 allows EC RO to enable PD for special cases. When doing so, it sets NO_BOOT flag to avoid booting the OS. AP needs to get NO_BOOT flag from Cr50 and enforce that. This patch makes verstage get a boot mode and a mirrored hash stored in kernel secdata from Cr50. This patch also makes romstage write an expected EC hash (a.k.a. Hexp) to Cr50 (if there is an update). BUG=b:147298634, chromium:1045217, b:148259137 BRANCH=none TEST=Verify software sync succeeds on Puff. Signed-off-by: dnojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org> Change-Id: I1f387b6e920205b9cc4c8536561f2a279c36413d Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40389 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-04-17TPM: Add tlcl_cr50_get_boot_modednojiri
tlcl_cr50_get_boot_mode gets the boot mode from Cr50. The boot mode tells coreboot/depthcharge whether booting the kernel is allowed or not. BUG=b:147298634, chromium:1045217, b:148259137 BRANCH=none TEST=Verify software sync succeeds on Puff. Signed-off-by: dnojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org> Change-Id: Iadae848c4bf315f2131ff6aebcb35938307b5db4 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40388 Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-04-15Do not select USE_BLOBSNico Huber
The `USE_BLOBS` config only exists for idealistic reasons. If we would allow us to use blobs by default, we wouldn't need that option and could just always do it. It's generally debatable for the project as a whole, but not per board/subject. Change-Id: I8591862699aef02e5a4ede32655fc82c44c97555 Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39884 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
2020-04-10assert.h: Simplify dead_code()Nico Huber
It turns out the linker's error message already includes the line number of the dead_code() invocation. If we don't include the line number in the identifier for our undefined reference, we don't need individual identifiers at all and can work with a single, global declaration. Change-Id: Ib63868ce3114c3f839867a3bfb1b03bdb6facf16 Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40240 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2020-04-04assert.h: Add a tag parameter to dead_code()Nico Huber
When dead_code() is used in inline functions in a header file, the generated function names (based on the line number) may collide with a dead_code() in the code file. Now that we are hit by such a case, we need a quick solution: Add a tag argument for all invocations in header files. Change-Id: I0c548ce998cf8e28ae9f76b5c0ea5630b4e91ae2 Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40140 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2020-04-04src/security: Use SPDX for GPL-2.0-only filesAngel Pons
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now. Change-Id: I51f5764b57fb8b62e3a4b3d41bd32e5330a2983c Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40057 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
2020-04-01security/tpm: Fix compile-time elimination for SEPARATE_VERSTAGEJulius Werner
CB:35077 pulled TPM measurement code into the bootblock, with the catch that we'll only cache PCR extensions and not actually write them to the TPM until it gets initialized in a later stage. The goal of this was to keep the heavy TPM driver code out of the size-constrained bootblock. Unfortunately, a small mistake in the tspi_tpm_is_setup() function prevents the compiler from eliminating references to the TPM driver code in the bootblock on platforms with CONFIG_VBOOT and CONFIG_SEPARATE_VERSTAGE. In those cases vboot_logic_executed() is known at compile-time to be 0, but that still makes the final expression `return 0 || tpm_is_setup;`. We know that tpm_is_setup can never be set to 1 in the bootblock, but the compiler doesn't. This patch rewrites the logic slightly to achieve the same effect in a way that the compiler can follow (because we only really need to check tpm_is_setup in the stage that actually runs the vboot code). Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Change-Id: Idc25acf1e6c02d929639e83d529cc14af80e0870 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39993 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org> Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-03-31security/vboot: relocate and rename vboot_platform_is_resuming()Bill XIE
After measured boot is decoupled from verified boot in CB:35077, vboot_platform_is_resuming() is never vboot-specific, thus it is renamed to platform_is_resuming() and declared in bootmode.h. Change-Id: I29b5b88af0576c34c10cfbd99659a5cdc0c75842 Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39103 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-03-31security/tpm: Include mrc.bin in CRTM if presentBill XIE
mrc.bin, on platforms where it is present, is code executed on CPU, so it should be considered a part of CRTM. cbfs_locate_file_in_region() is hooked to measurement here too, since mrc.bin is loaded with it, and CBFS_TYPE_MRC (the type of mrc.bin) is measured to TPM_CRTM_PCR rather than TPM_RUNTIME_DATA_PCR. TODO: I have heard that SMM is too resource-limited to link with vboot library, so currently tspi_measure_cbfs_hook() is masked in SMM. Please correct me if I am wrong. Change-Id: Ib4c3cf47b919864056baf725001ca8a4aaafa110 Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38858 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-03-31security/vboot: Decouple measured boot from verified bootBill XIE
Currently, those who want to use measured boot implemented within vboot should enable verified boot first, along with sections such as GBB and RW slots defined with manually written fmd files, even if they do not actually want to verify anything. As discussed in CB:34977, measured boot should be decoupled from verified boot and make them two fully independent options. Crypto routines necessary for measurement could be reused, and TPM and CRTM init should be done somewhere other than vboot_logic_executed() if verified boot is not enabled. In this revision, only TCPA log is initialized during bootblock. Before TPM gets set up, digests are not measured into tpm immediately, but cached in TCPA log, and measured into determined PCRs right after TPM is up. This change allows those who do not want to use the verified boot scheme implemented by vboot as well as its requirement of a more complex partition scheme designed for chromeos to make use of the measured boot functionality implemented within vboot library to measure the boot process. TODO: Measure MRC Cache somewhere, as MRC Cache has never resided in CBFS any more, so it cannot be covered by tspi_measure_cbfs_hook(). Change-Id: I1fb376b4a8b98baffaee4d574937797bba1f8aee Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35077 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
2020-03-17src (minus soc and mainboard): Remove copyright noticesPatrick Georgi
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example: - What's a "Copyright $year-present"? - Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current copyright holder? - People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even though they only deleted stuff - Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year, because why not? - Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"? - Or "Generated Code"? Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead and use the git history to deal with the rest. Change-Id: I89b10076e0f4a4b3acd59160fb7abe349b228321 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39611 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-03-15treewide: Replace uses of "Nehalem"Angel Pons
The code in coreboot is actually for the Arrandale processors, which are a MCM (Multi-Chip Module) with two different dies: - Hillel: 32nm Westmere dual-core CPU - Ironlake: 45nm northbridge with integrated graphics This has nothing to do with the older, single-die Nehalem processors. Therefore, replace the references to Nehalem with the correct names. Change-Id: I8c10a2618c519d2411211b9b8f66d24f0018f908 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38942 Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-03-12vboot: remove extraneous vboot_recovery_mode_memory_retrainJoel Kitching
Just call get_recovery_mode_retrain_switch() directly. BUG=b:124141368 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: Icb88d6862db1782e0218276984e527638b21fd3a Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39343 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2020-03-07vboot: Upgrade kernel space to v1.0dnojiri
This patch upgrades the kernel space to v1.0 to accommodate EC hash, which is used for CrOS EC's early firmware selection. BUG=chromium:1045217 BRANCH=none TEST=Boot Helios. Verify software sync works. Cq-Depend: chromium:2041695 Change-Id: I525f1551afd1853cae826e87198057410167b239 Signed-off-by: dnojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39137 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-03-06security/vboot: Support enabling EC EFS with EC software syncSam McNally
If the ChromeOS EC uses EC early firmware selection (EFS), the AP vboot build must also enable EC EFS. Add an option to control this, passing it through to vboot. BUG=b:150742950 TEST=none BRANCH=none Signed-off-by: Sam McNally <sammc@chromium.org> Change-Id: I697e90748e19d15af154011413b30c0f2a0bf52e Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39272 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
2020-02-24treewide: Capitalize 'CMOS'Elyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: I1d36e554618498d70f33f6c425b0abc91d4fb952 Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38928 Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-02-24vboot: remove rogue vboot_struct.h includeJoel Kitching
As part of vboot1 deprecation, remove an unused vboot_struct.h include. coreboot is now free of vboot1 data structure use. One vboot_api.h include remains as part of security/vboot/ec_sync.c. BUG=b:124141368 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I042d692aa252f8f859d4005455eb6a2eabc24a87 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39024 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-02-21security/intel/stm: Use depends on ENABLE_VMXEugene Myers
The STM is a part of the core VTx and using ENABLE_VMX will make the STM option available for any configuration that has an Intel processor that supports VTx. Signed-off-by: Eugene D. Myers <edmyers@tycho.nsa.gov> Change-Id: I57ff82754e6c692c8722d41f812e35940346888a Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38852 Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-02-21security/intel/stm: Check for processor STM supportEugene Myers
Check to ensure that dual monitor mode is supported on the current processor. Dual monitor mode is normally supported on any Intel x86 processor that has VTx support. The STM is a hypervisor that executes in SMM dual monitor mode. This check should fail only in the rare case were dual monitor mode is disabled. If the check fails, then the STM will not be initialized by coreboot. Signed-off-by: Eugene D. Myers <edmyers@tycho.nsa.gov> Change-Id: I518bb2aa1bdec94b5b6d5e991d7575257f3dc6e9 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38836 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
2020-02-19vboot: use vb2api_get_recovery_reason functionJoel Kitching
Use vb2api_get_recovery_reason() API function rather than accessing vb2_shared_data internals. Of all the vanilla verified boot code in coreboot, this is the last remaining use of vboot's internal data structures in coreboot. There remains only one sole instance in Eltan's code. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:957880 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I845c9b14ffa830bc7de28e9a38188f7066871803 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Cq-Depend: chromium:2055662 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38886 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-02-18security/vboot: Correct help text of VBOOT_STARTS_IN_ROMSTAGEYu-Ping Wu
Since CB:37231 [1], the vboot working data has been replaced with vboot work buffer, so corrrect the help text of option VBOOT_STARTS_IN_ROMSTAGE accordingly. [1] security/vboot: Remove struct vboot_working_data BRANCH=none BUG=chromium:1021452 TEST=none Change-Id: I80783274179ae7582bbb4c8f9d392895623badce Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38900 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
2020-02-17vboot: rename GBB flag FAFT_KEY_OVERIDE to FLAG_RUNNING_FAFTJoel Kitching
This was renamed in vboot_reference CL:1977902. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:965914 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I79af304e9608a30c6839cd616378c7330c3de00a Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37462 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-02-17vboot: remove VBOOT_SAVE_RECOVERY_REASON_ON_REBOOT optionJoel Kitching
With CL:1940398, this option is no longer needed. Recovery requests are not cleared until kernel verification stage is reached. If the FSP triggers any reboots, recovery requests will be preserved. In particular: - Manual requests will be preserved via recovery switch state, whose behaviour is modified in CB:38779. - Other recovery requests will remain in nvdata across reboot. These functions now only work after verstage has run: int vboot_check_recovery_request(void) int vboot_recovery_mode_enabled(void) int vboot_developer_mode_enabled(void) BUG=b:124141368, b:35576380 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I52d17a3c6730be5c04c3c0ae020368d11db6ca3c Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38780 Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-02-17vboot: push clear recovery mode switch until BS_WRITE_TABLESJoel Kitching
Serves two purposes: (1) On some platforms, FSP initialization may cause a reboot. Push clearing the recovery mode switch until after FSP code runs, so that a manual recovery request (three-finger salute) will function correctly under this condition. (2) The recovery mode switch value is needed at BS_WRITE_TABLES for adding an event to elog. (Previously this was done by stashing the value in CBMEM_ID_EC_HOSTEVENT.) BUG=b:124141368, b:35576380 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I30c02787c620b937e5a50a5ed94ac906e3112dad Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38779 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-02-14vboot: fix up some includesJoel Kitching
These header files need to make use of vb2_shared_data. Remove the last vestiges of vboot1 data structures in coreboot. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:1038260 TEST=Build locally with CL:2054269 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I61b27e33751c11aac9f8af261a75d83b003b5f92 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38884 Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-02-10vboot: correct workbuf size when VBOOT_STARTS_IN_ROMSTAGEJoel Kitching
Part of the design of vboot persistent context is that the workbuf gets placed in CBMEM and stays there for depthcharge to use in kernel verification. As such, the space allocated in CBMEM needs to be at least VB2_KERNEL_WORKBUF_RECOMMENDED_SIZE. In the VBOOT_STARTS_IN_ROMSTAGE case, prior to this CL, vboot_get_context() would get invoked for the first time after CBMEM comes up, and it would only allocate VB2_FIRMWARE_WORKBUF_RECOMMENDED_SIZE. Initialize the workbuf directly in vboot_setup_cbmem() instead with the correct VB2_KERNEL_WORKBUF_RECOMMENDED_SIZE. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:994060 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild TEST=boot on GOOGLE_EVE with VBOOT_STARTS_IN_ROMSTAGE set BRANCH=none Change-Id: Ie09c39f960b3f14f3a64c648eee6ca3f23214d9a Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38778 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-02-09intel/stm: Add platform opt-in KconfigNico Huber
Selecting STM on an arbitrary platform would likely result in a brick, so let's hide the prompt by default. Change-Id: I50f2106ac05c3efb7f92fccb1e6edfbf961b68b8 Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38764 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: <cedarhouse1@comcast.net> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2020-02-07security/vboot: relocate vb2ex_abort and vb2ex_printfJoel Kitching
Enabling an assertion in vb2_member_of() results in coreboot linking vb2ex_abort() and vb2ex_printf() in ramstage. Move these two functions from vboot_logic.c to vboot_lib.c, which is should be enabled in all stages if CONFIG_VBOOT_LIB is enabled. Note that CONFIG_VBOOT_LIB is implied by CONFIG_VBOOT. Relevant vboot_reference commit: CL:2037263. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:1005700 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: Ica0103c5684b3d50ba7dc1b4c39559cb192efa81 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38706 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
2020-02-05security/intel/stm: Add STM supportEugene Myers
This update is a combination of all four of the patches so that the commit can be done without breaking parts of coreboot. This possible breakage is because of the cross-dependencies between the original separate patches would cause failure because of data structure changes. security/intel/stm This directory contains the functions that check and move the STM to the MSEG, create its page tables, and create the BIOS resource list. The STM page tables is a six page region located in the MSEG and are pointed to by the CR3 Offset field in the MSEG header. The initial page tables will identity map all memory between 0-4G. The STM starts in IA32e mode, which requires page tables to exist at startup. The BIOS resource list defines the resources that the SMI Handler is allowed to access. This includes the SMM memory area where the SMI handler resides and other resources such as I/O devices. The STM uses the BIOS resource list to restrict the SMI handler's accesses. The BIOS resource list is currently located in the same area as the SMI handler. This location is shown in the comment section before smm_load_module in smm_module_loader.c Note: The files within security/intel/stm come directly from their Tianocore counterparts. Unnecessary code has been removed and the remaining code has been converted to meet coreboot coding requirements. For more information see: SMI Transfer Monitor (STM) User Guide, Intel Corp., August 2015, Rev 1.0, can be found at firmware.intel.com include/cpu/x86: Addtions to include/cpu/x86 for STM support. cpu/x86: STM Set up - The STM needs to be loaded into the MSEG during BIOS initialization and the SMM Monitor Control MSR be set to indicate that an STM is in the system. cpu/x86/smm: SMI module loader modifications needed to set up the SMM descriptors used by the STM during its initialization Change-Id: If4adcd92c341162630ce1ec357ffcf8a135785ec Signed-off-by: Eugene D. Myers <edmyers@tycho.nsa.gov> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33234 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-by: ron minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2020-02-05vendorcode/eltan/security: Switch to vb2 vboot libraryWim Vervoorn
The eltan verified_boot is using the vboot 2.1 data structures and code, as well as the fwlib21 build target, they are all deprecated. Refer to CB:37654 for more information. The verified_boot code is updated to use the vb2 structures and code and make sure only public functions are used. BUG=N/A TEST=build Change-Id: I1e1a7bce6110fe35221a4d7a47c1eb7c7074c318 Signed-off-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38590 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
2020-02-04security/tpm/tss: Add ClearControl FunctionChristian Walter
Add ClearControl Function which is needed for a follow-up patch. Change-Id: Ia19185528fd821e420b0bdb424760c93b79523a4 Signed-off-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38617 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
2020-01-25vboot: Remove hard dependency on MISSING_BOARD_RESETJulius Werner
Having a working board reset is certainly better when you're running vboot (because otherwise you'll hang when transitioning into recovery mode), but I don't think it should be strictly required, since it's still somewhat usable without. This is particularly important for certain test platforms that don't have a good way to reset but might still be useful for vboot testing/prototyping. Change-Id: Ia765f54b6e2e176e2d54478fb1e0839d8cab9849 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38417 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-01-18security/vboot: Allow UDC regardless of vboot stateWim Vervoorn
When a VBOOT enabled system is used without ChromeOS it may be valid to allow the UDC independent of the vboot state. Provide the option to always allow UDC when CHROMEOS is not selected. BUG=N/A TEST=build Change-Id: I6142c4a74ca6930457b16f62f32e1199b8baaff8 Signed-off-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38403 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2020-01-18cbfs: Remove locator conceptJulius Werner
When vboot was first integrated into CBFS it was still part of Google vendorcode. So to not directly tie custom vendorcode into the core CBFS library, the concept of cbfs_locator was introduced to decouple core code from an arbitrary amount of platform-specific implementations that want to decide where the CBFS can be found. Nowadays vboot is a core coreboot feature itself, and the locator concept isn't used by anything else anymore. This patch simplifies the code by removing it and just calling vboot from the CBFS library directly. That should make it easier to more closely integrate vboot into CBFS in the future. Change-Id: I7b9112adc7b53aa218c58b8cb5c85982dcc1dbc0 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38419 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2020-01-10src/security: Fix typosElyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: I238fce2d48cf62003a701f972a87974415419538 Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38198 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2019-12-26src: Remove unused include <string.h>Elyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: Ic6b66dd8fa387e67bb0ce609fb7e2553eeb66b3c Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37888 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2019-12-20security/vboot: Add a dedicated flag for building of vboot libraryBill XIE
As discussed in CB:35077, since both measured boot and verified boot depends on vboot library, it had better to introduce a dedicated flag CONFIG_VBOOT_LIB to control the building and linking of the vboot library, and make other flags needing vboot library select it. Only the actual verification stuff should be conditional on CONFIG_VBOOT. Change-Id: Ia1907a11c851ee45a70582e02bdbe08fb18cc6a4 Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37787 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
2019-12-19src/security: Remove unused <stdlib.h>Elyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: I0b5c375baf7911ebced2f8c43a88aae014c877ad Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33694 Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-12-19arch/x86: Drop uses of ROMCC_BOOTBLOCKArthur Heymans
Change-Id: Ia0405fdd448cb31b3c6ca3b3d76e49e9f430bf74 Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37339 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
2019-12-18vboot: remove 2lib headers from MakefileJoel Kitching
Only headers from firmware/lib should be imported. As far as I can tell, nothing imports 2lib headers directly anymore, so we can get rid of this CFLAG. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:968464 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: Ie5f3fe1d0180113b332e57ed07d4cfe563e7ecf2 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37786 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-04 11:22:04 +0000