| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: I22fffa0eab006be2bad4d3dd776b22ad9830faef
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40129
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I4c110f60b764c97fab2a29f6f04680196f156da5
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
Hide the fundamental BIOSRAM accessors to force use of the
memory space via abstraction functions.
Change-Id: I774b6640cdd9873f52e446c4ca41b7c537a87883
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37862
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Spiegel <richard.spiegel@silverbackltd.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
According to BKDGs for families 15h 60-6fh or newer and families 16h the
ACPI MMIO decode enable bit is the second LSB, not the first LSB.
Additionally create another enable function for older families where
the register and bit is different.
It does not seem to impact any current board, but may be crucial for
incoming C bootblock implementations when this bit will need to be set
very early. Most likely this bit is set by AGESA right now.
Signed-off-by: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com>
Change-Id: Iaa31abc3dbdf77d8513fa83c7415b9a1b7fd266f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37178
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The overhead of pushing variables to stack exceeded the number
of instructions the actual MMIO operation took and the build of
google/aleena with inlined accessors turned out to be just
slightly (<2 KiB) smaller for the entire romstage or ramstage.
Simple read-modify-write MMIO cycles should optimise better now.
IO cycles with index/data register are borderline, at
first sight assembly looked better by not inlining them.
Change-Id: If2c37c9886a0151183aa6dd80eb068d6c67b3848
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37211
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
If one wishes to use the functions guarded here, he
has to have datasheet open anyways. It should be clear
from there which regions are supported and which are not.
TEST=Reproducible build of google/aleena.
Change-Id: I0c1f0c9c9a6711532c5078c08cdf9e6612f3bc9c
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37210
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com>
|
|
The standard PCI register space for D14F0 is accessible at 0xfed80000.
Add functions for use as helpers.
Change-Id: Icbf5bdc449322c3f5e59e6126d709cb2808591d5
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34914
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Add a method for the soc/amd/<product> to indicate what AcpiMmio
ranges are supported. Induce a build error if soc or mainboard
code is added which attempts to use an unsupported block.
This patch attempts to dissuade accessing unsupported blocks without
requiring the complexity of structures or reinitializing at the
beginning of a new stage.
TEST=boot grunt, force build errors by removing blocks in iomap.h
BUG=b:131682806
Change-Id: I2121df108fd3caf07e5588bc3201bcdd8dcaaa00
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32934
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Spiegel <richard.spiegel@silverbackltd.com>
|
|
Modify the 16 and 32 bit BIOS RAM access functions that had been
originally moved from stoneyridge. This was suggested in the
review of
69486cac7: Create AcpiMmio functionality from stoneyridge
Change-Id: I5b491da6f263cbab2b549301e16a7e19896f2428
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32932
Reviewed-by: Richard Spiegel <richard.spiegel@silverbackltd.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Document the AcpiMmio individual blocks better. This is in response
to a request in gerrit for
69486cac7: Create AcpiMmio functionality from stoneyridge
Correct comments that were inadvertently left in place from older
patches.
Change-Id: I4c16a866de5622e8cfbd3a08816b9d3182950d0e
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32931
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Richard Spiegel <richard.spiegel@silverbackltd.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change all arguments named "offset" to "reg" to match the others.
These should have gone into change
69486cac7: Create AcpiMmio functionality from stoneyridge
Change-Id: Ifdd00d0a5d1e03bfa68a13eeece2d2cfd56aa39d
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32930
Reviewed-by: Richard Spiegel <richard.spiegel@silverbackltd.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Move the stoneyridge AcpiMmio code into soc/amd/common.
The SB800 southbridge introduced the MMIO hardware blocks at 0xfed80000
commonly known as AcpiMmio. Implementations beginning with Mullins
enable decode in PMx04. Older designs use PMx24 and allow for
configuring the base address. Future work may support the older version.
Comparing the documentation for AMD's RRGs and BKDGs, it is evident that
the block locations have not been reassigned across products. In some
cases, address locations are deprecated and new ones consumed, e.g. the
early GPIO blocks were simpler at offset 0x100 and the newer GPIO banks
are now at 0x1500, 0x1600, and 0x1700.
Note: Do not infer the definitions within the hardware blocks are
consistent across family/model products.
BUG=b:131682806
Change-Id: I083b6339cd29e72289e63c9331a815c46d71600d
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32649
Reviewed-by: Richard Spiegel <richard.spiegel@silverbackltd.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
