Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: I22fffa0eab006be2bad4d3dd776b22ad9830faef
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40129
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I4c110f60b764c97fab2a29f6f04680196f156da5
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
This removes all the duplicated code and logic and leverages
the existing ones in libraries themselves. The current side
effect is that protection cannot be fully enabled because the
read, write, and write enable command are not exposed in struct
spi_flash currently. That support can be revised if protection
scheme makes sense for our use-cases once it's better understood.
BUG=b:146928174
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I8faf9cc719ee33dd9f03fb74b579b02bbc6a5e2e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37957
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
When checking that command and data fit in the FIFO, don't count the first
byte. The command doesn't go through the FIFO.
TEST=confirm error (4+68>71) goes away on Mandolin
BUG=b:146225550
Change-Id: Ica2ca514deea401c9c5396913087e07a12ab3cf3
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37721
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Peers <epeers@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Use MIN() and MAX() defined in commonlib/helpers.h
Change-Id: I02d0a47937bc2d6ab2cd01995a2c6b6db245da15
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37454
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
According to the POSIX standard, %p is supposed to print a pointer "as
if by %#x", meaning the "0x" prefix should automatically be prepended.
All other implementations out there (glibc, Linux, even libpayload) do
this, so we should make coreboot match. This patch changes vtxprintf()
accordingly and removes any explicit instances of "0x%p" from existing
format strings.
How to handle zero padding is less clear: the official POSIX definition
above technically says there should be no automatic zero padding, but in
practice most other implementations seem to do it and I assume most
programmers would prefer it. The way chosen here is to always zero-pad
to 32 bits, even on a 64-bit system. The rationale for this is that even
on 64-bit systems, coreboot always avoids using any memory above 4GB for
itself, so in practice all pointers should fit in that range and padding
everything to 64 bits would just hurt readability. Padding it this way
also helps pointers that do exceed 4GB (e.g. prints from MMU config on
some arm64 systems) stand out better from the others.
Change-Id: I0171b52f7288abb40e3fc3c8b874aee14b9bdcd6
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37626
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Guckian
|
|
Change-Id: I2a94c3b6282e9915fd2b8136b124740c8a7b774c
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36082
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
All solid state devices have vendor id defined by JEDEC specification JEP106,
which originally allocated only 7 bits for it plus parity. When number of
vendors exploded beyond 126, a banking proposition came maintaining
compatibility with older vendors while allowing for 4 extra bits (16 banks)
through the introduction of the concept "Continuation code", denoted by the
byte value of 0x7f.
Examples:
0xfe, 0x60, 0x18, 0x00, 0x00 => vendor 0xfe of bank o
0x7f, 0x7f, 0xfe, 0x60, 0x18 => vendor 0xfe of bank 2
BUG=b:141535133
TEST=Build and boot grunt.
Change-Id: I16c5df70b8ba65017d1a45c79e90a76d1f78550c
Signed-off-by: Richard Spiegel <richard.spiegel@silverbackltd.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35589
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
|
|
Create a new SPI code that overrides flash operations and uses the SPI
controller within the FCH to its fullest.
Reference: Family 15h models 70h-7Fh BKDG revision 3.06 (public)
BUG=b:136595978
TEST=Build and boot grunt using this code, with debug enabled. Check
output.
Change-Id: Id293fb9b2da84c4206c7a1341b64e83fc0b8d71d
Signed-off-by: Richard Spiegel <richard.spiegel@silverbackltd.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35018
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org>
|