| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
It's not stricly related to spinlocks. If defined, a better
location should be found and the name collisions with other
barrier() defined in nb/intel solved.
Change-Id: Iae187b5bcc249c2a4bc7bee80d37e34c13d9e63d
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43810
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
It's not related to spinlocks and the actual implementation
was also guarded by CONFIG(SMP).
With a single call-site in x86-specific code, empty stubs
for other arch are currently not necessary.
Also drop an unused included on a nearby line.
Change-Id: I00439e9c1d10c943ab5e404f5d687d316768fa16
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43808
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
If CONFIG_CMOS_POST is enabled, psp_verstage breaks because the
spinlock code is missing. Add dummy spinlock code as the spinlocks
aren't needed in the PSP.
TEST=Build with CONFIG_CMOS_POST enabled.
BUG=None
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: Iea6f31e500e1b26f0b974c6eaa486209b9c81459
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/43310
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
