Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
All boards and chips that are still using LATE_CBMEM_INIT are being
removed as previously discussed.
If these boards and chips are updated to not use LATE_CBMEM_INIT, they
can be restored to the active codebase from the 4.7 branch.
chips:
soc/dmp/vortex86ex
Mainboards:
mainboard/dmp/vortex86ex
Change-Id: Iee7b6005cc2964b2346aaf4dbd9b2d2112b7403f
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/22026
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
The array of CMOS values that was passed into the read routine was
never getting updated. GCC 7.1 gives a warning on this:
error: may be used uninitialized in this function
Change-Id: I2f7c9b6455761a38598467b001efb0603fd14c32
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20700
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I2e7b756296e861e08cea846297f687a880daaf45
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20355
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
There are many good reasons why we may want to run some sort of generic
callback before we're executing a reset. Unfortunateley, that is really
hard right now: code that wants to reset simply calls the hard_reset()
function (or one of its ill-differentiated cousins) which is directly
implemented by a myriad of different mainboards, northbridges, SoCs,
etc. More recent x86 SoCs have tried to solve the problem in their own
little corner of soc/intel/common, but it's really something that would
benefit all of coreboot.
This patch expands the concept onto all boards: hard_reset() and friends
get implemented in a generic location where they can run hooks before
calling the platform-specific implementation that is now called
do_hard_reset(). The existing Intel reset_prepare() gets generalized as
soc_reset_prepare() (and other hooks for arch, mainboard, etc. can now
easily be added later if necessary). We will also use this central point
to ensure all platforms flush their cache before reset, which is
generally useful for all cases where we're trying to persist information
in RAM across reboots (like the new persistent CBMEM console does).
Also remove cpu_reset() completely since it's not used anywhere and
doesn't seem very useful compared to the others.
Change-Id: I41b89ce4a923102f0748922496e1dd9bce8a610f
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19789
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
The deprecated LATE_CBMEM_INIT function is renamed:
set_top_of_ram -> set_late_cbmem_top
Obscure term top_of_ram is replaced:
backup_top_of_ram -> backup_top_of_low_cacheable
get_top_of_ram -> restore_top_of_low_cacheable
New function that always resolves to CBMEM top boundary, with
or without SMM, is named restore_cbmem_top().
Change-Id: I61d20f94840ad61e9fd55976e5aa8c27040b8fb7
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19377
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7f0d3400126d593bad8e78f95e6b9a378463b4ce
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15963
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Omar Pakker
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I16c04452d2d6c3205aea29fe8aa8fad8fc485a46
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14600
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|