| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Add group information for each gpio community and use it to
calculate offset of a pad within its group. Original implementation
assumed that the number of gpios in each group is same but that lead to
a bug for cnl since numbers differ for each group.
BUG=b:69616750
TEST=Need to test again on SKL,CNL,APL,GLK
Change-Id: I02ab1d878bc83d32222be074bd2db5e23adaf580
Signed-off-by: Bora Guvendik <bora.guvendik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/22571
Reviewed-by: Lijian Zhao <lijian.zhao@intel.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
1. Explicitly add LOGICAL to the reset macro name to make it explicit
that the values are logical.
2. Reword some of the comments and combine them into single comment
instead of scattering the comments throughout.
3. Use c99 struct initializers for the reset mapping array.
4. For the chipset specific values use literals that match the hardware.
5. Use 'U' suffixes on the literals so we don't trip up compiler being
over zealous on undefined behavior.
6. Use unsigned and fixed-width types for the reset mapping structure
since the code is reliant on matching up with a register definition.
7. Fix formatting that can fit < 80 cols.
Change-Id: Iaa23a319832c05b8a023f6e45c4ee5ac06dd7066
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20589
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
No regression observed on a APL platform
Change-Id: I0fcc22df5eaec014f3b89755415f051b05aa554a
Signed-off-by: Hannah Williams <hannah.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19949
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
