Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
According to spec IRQ1 isn't available for PIRQ assignment.
Has gone unnoticed probably because modern OS use MSI or
at least APIC and even with noapic don't use IRQ1 with PCI
IRQs.
Change-Id: Idc7db249007df629b27e8cae41cc80358d5306f6
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7478
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
The ACPI compiler is trying to be helpful in letting us know that we're
not using various fields in the MCRS 'ResourceTemplate' when we define
it inside of the _CRS method. Since we're not intending to use those
objects in the method, it shouldn't be an issue, but the warning is
annoying. Moving the creation of the MCRS object to outside of the
_CRS method and referencing it from there solves this problem.
Change-Id: I222642e9a93f3078b46ed74f57b83a5834657abf
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7499
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
|
|
This adds S3 Suspend / Resume support to Intel's Bay Trail FSP
It is based on the "src/soc/intel/baytrail/romstage/romstage.c"
implementation.
Change-Id: If0011068eb7290d1b764c5c4b12c17375fb69008
Signed-off-by: Mohan D'Costa <mohan@ndr.co.jp>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6937
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
irq_helper.h intentionally gets included into irqroute.asl twice - once
for pic mode and once for apic mode. Since people are used to seeing
guard statements on the .h files, add the guards to irqroute.h and add
a comment to irq_helper.h explaining why they aren't there. Add a
time.
Change-Id: I882cbbff0f73bdb170bd0f1053767893722dc60a
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6572
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
|
|
Change-Id: If70f5ad26d639d7366772f4468a25bca83ac0857
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6295
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer@gmail.com>
|
|
While similar to the Bay Trail-M/D code based on the MRC, there are
many differences as well:
- Obviously, uses the FSP instead of the MRC binaries.
- FSP does additional hardware setup, so coreboot doesn't need to.
- Different microcode & microcode loading method
- Uses the cache_as_ram.inc from the FSP Driver
- Various other changes in support of the FSP
Additional changes that don't have to to with the FSP vs MRC:
- Updated IRQ Routing
- Different FADT implementation.
This was validated with FSP:
BAYTRAIL_FSP_GOLD_002_10-JANUARY-2014.fd
SHA256: d29eefbb33454bd5314bfaa38fb055d592a757de7b348ed7096cd8c2d65908a5
MD5: 9360cd915f0d3e4116bbc782233d7b91
Change-Id: Iadadf8cd6cf444ba840e0f76d3aed7825cd7aee4
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5791
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|