summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/soc/intel/fsp_baytrail/bootblock
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2014-12-19fsp_baytrail: Initialize LPC pads in bootblock for port 80Martin Roth
Port 80h codes were coming out of bootblock and romstage scrambled, or were not coming out at all. Initializing the LPC signal pads as LPC fixes that issue. Change-Id: I16943513f2eb6fe8fa58766aaa82dac182440c34 Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7802 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@gmx.net> Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-05-29fsp_baytrail: Add the FSP version of Intel's Bay Trail-I chipMartin Roth
While similar to the Bay Trail-M/D code based on the MRC, there are many differences as well: - Obviously, uses the FSP instead of the MRC binaries. - FSP does additional hardware setup, so coreboot doesn't need to. - Different microcode & microcode loading method - Uses the cache_as_ram.inc from the FSP Driver - Various other changes in support of the FSP Additional changes that don't have to to with the FSP vs MRC: - Updated IRQ Routing - Different FADT implementation. This was validated with FSP: BAYTRAIL_FSP_GOLD_002_10-JANUARY-2014.fd SHA256: d29eefbb33454bd5314bfaa38fb055d592a757de7b348ed7096cd8c2d65908a5 MD5: 9360cd915f0d3e4116bbc782233d7b91 Change-Id: Iadadf8cd6cf444ba840e0f76d3aed7825cd7aee4 Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5791 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>