| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
They were only used internal to the SPI drivers and, according to the comment
next to their prototypes, were for when the SPI controller doesn't control the
chip select line directly and needs some help.
BUG=None
TEST=Built for link, falco, and rambi. Built and booted on peach_pit and nyan.
BRANCH=None
Original-Change-Id: If4622819a4437490797d305786e2436e2e70c42b
Original-Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/192048
Original-Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 1e2deecd9d8c6fd690c54f24e902cc7d2bab0521)
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Change-Id: Ida08cbc2be5ad09b929ca16e483c36c49ac12627
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7708
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
spi_set_speed was never implemented, and spi_cs_is_valid was only implemented
as a stub and never called.
BUG=None
TEST=Built for rambi, falco, and peach_pit.
BRANCH=None
Original-Change-Id: If30c2339f5e0360a5099eb540fab73fb23582905
Original-Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/192045
Original-Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit 98c1f6014c512e75e989df36b48622a7b56d0582)
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Change-Id: Iebdb2704ee81aee432c83ab182246d31ef52a6b6
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7707
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Change-Id: Ica9e3a91718a7e490ff80e5029fc29650355eb47
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7704
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
|
|
SPI controllers in Intel and AMD bridges have a slightly different
restriction on how long transactions they can handle.
Change-Id: I3d149d4b7e7e9633482a153d5e380a86c553d871
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6163
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
|
|
Whenever spi_xfer is called and whenver it's implemented, the natural unit for
the amount of data being transfered is bytes. The API expected things to be
expressed in bits, however, which led to a lot of multiplying and dividing by
eight, and checkes to make sure things were multiples of eight. All of that
can now be removed.
BUG=None
TEST=Built and booted on link, falco, peach_pit and nyan and looked for SPI
errors in the firmware log. Built for rambi.
BRANCH=None
Change-Id: I02365bdb6960a35def7be7a0cd1aa0a2cc09392f
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/192049
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
[km: cherry-pick from chromium]
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6175
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
The spi_flash_probe and and spi_setup_slave functions each took a max_hz
parameter and a spi_mode parameter which were never used.
BUG=None
TEST=Built for link, falco, rambi, nyan.
BRANCH=None
Change-Id: I3a2e0a9ab530bcc0f722f81f00e8c7bd1f6d2a22
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/192046
Reviewed-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Tested-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org>
[km: cherry-pick from chromium]
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6174
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
While similar to the Bay Trail-M/D code based on the MRC, there are
many differences as well:
- Obviously, uses the FSP instead of the MRC binaries.
- FSP does additional hardware setup, so coreboot doesn't need to.
- Different microcode & microcode loading method
- Uses the cache_as_ram.inc from the FSP Driver
- Various other changes in support of the FSP
Additional changes that don't have to to with the FSP vs MRC:
- Updated IRQ Routing
- Different FADT implementation.
This was validated with FSP:
BAYTRAIL_FSP_GOLD_002_10-JANUARY-2014.fd
SHA256: d29eefbb33454bd5314bfaa38fb055d592a757de7b348ed7096cd8c2d65908a5
MD5: 9360cd915f0d3e4116bbc782233d7b91
Change-Id: Iadadf8cd6cf444ba840e0f76d3aed7825cd7aee4
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5791
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
