coreboot - Some coreboot project code with my work

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2020-05-01	soc/intel/{jsl,tgl}: Rename PcdDebugInterfaceFlags macros for better ↵	Subrata Banik
	understanding BIT 1 -> DEBUG_INTERFACE_UART_8250IO BIT 4 -> DEBUG_INTERFACE_LPSS_SERIAL_IO Change-Id: I566b9dc82b2289af42e58705ebeee51179886f1f Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40904 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Wonkyu Kim <wonkyu.kim@intel.com>
2020-05-01	soc/intel/jasperlake: fix args of dimm_info_fill() for dram_part_num	Marco Chen
	BUG=b:152019429 BRANCH=None TEST=1. provision dram_part_num field of CBI 2. modify mainboard - dedede to report DRAM part number from CBI 3. check DRAM part number is correct in SMBIOS for memory device Change-Id: I509d06a81bd005c5afe6e74a2da2ca408dee7b29 Signed-off-by: Marco Chen <marcochen@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40833 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
2020-04-14	soc/intel/jasperlake: Allow mainboard to override DRAM part number	Marco Chen
	In order to support mainboards that do not store DRAM part number in the traditional way i.e. within the CBFS SPD for soldered memory, this change provides a runtime callback to allow mainboards to provide DRAM part number from a custom location e.g. external EEPROM on dedede. For other boards it should be a NOP since the weak implementation of mainboard_get_dram_part_num does nothing. BUG=b:152019429 Change-Id: I7ba635f5504ba288308d7d7a4935f405f289aa8d Signed-off-by: Marco Chen <marcochen@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40302 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2020-04-06	soc/intel/jasperlake: Use SPDX for GPL-2.0-only files	Angel Pons
	Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now. Change-Id: I2efdeb224c478995d393aa3eaac762c876832391 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40216 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
2020-04-01	soc/intel/{tgl,jsl}: Use soc/intel/jasperlake for Jasper Lake SoC	Aamir Bohra
	Switch to using Jasper Lake SoC code from soc/intel/jasperlake and stop referring from soc/intel/tigerlake. Addtionally mainboard changes are done to support build. BUG=b:150217037 TEST=Build and boot waddledoo. Build jasperlake_rvp and volteer board. Change-Id: I39f117bd66cb610a305bcdb8ea65332fd0ff4814 Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39825 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
2020-03-28	soc/intel/jasperlake: Remove Tiger Lake SoC code from Jasper Lake	Aamir Bohra
	This is a follow-up patch to initial copy patch for Jasper Lake SoC. Remove all Tiger Lake specfic code from Jasper Lake SoC code. BUG=b:150217037 Change-Id: I44dc6bf55ca18a3f0c350f5c3e9fae2996958648 Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39824 Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com> Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-03-28	soc/intel/jasperlake: Add Jasper Lake SoC support	Aamir Bohra
	This is a copy patch from Tiger Lake SoC code. The only changes done on top of copy is changing below configs: 1. SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE -> SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE_COPY 2. SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE -> SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE_COPY 3. SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE_BASE -> SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE_BASE_COPY We started with initial assumption that JSL and TGL can co-exist. But now we see the SoC code in Tiger Lake is relying on too many compile-time directives to make two SoCs co-exist. Some of the differences are listed below: -> Kconfig: Multiple Kconfig options using if SOC_INTEL_{TIGERLAKE/JASPERLAKE} -> GPIO: GPIO communities have their own differences. This requires conditional checks in gpio.asl, gpio.c, gpio*.h, pmc.h and gpio.asl -> PCI IRQs: Set up differently for JSL and TGL -> PCIe: Number of Root ports differ. -> eMMC/SD: Only supported on JSL. -> USB: Number of USB port are different for JSL and TGL. -> Memory configuration parameters are different for JSL and TGL. -> FSP parameters for JSL and TGL are different. The split of JSL and TGL SoC code is planned as below: 1. Copy Tiger Lake SoC code as is, and change SoC Kconfig to avoid conflicts with current mainboard builds. 2. Clean up TGL code out of copy patch done in step 1. Make it JSL only code. The SoC config still kept as SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE_COPY. 3. Change JSL SOC Kconfig from SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE_COPY to SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE, dedede and jasperlake_rvp boards can bind to SoC code from soc/intel/jasperlake. This step establishes Jasper Lake as a separate SoC. 4. Clean up current JSL code from TGL code. This step establishes Tiger Lake as a separate SoC. BUG=b:150217037 Change-Id: I9c33f478a2f8ed5e2d8e7815821d13044d35d388 Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39823 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>