summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/vboot/vbnv_cmos.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-10-22security/vboot: Move vboot2 to security kconfig sectionPhilipp Deppenwiese
This commit just moves the vboot sources into the security directory and fixes kconfig/makefile paths. Fix vboot2 headers Change-Id: Icd87f95640186f7a625242a3937e1dd13347eb60 Signed-off-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin@das-labor.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/22074 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
2017-09-20vboot: reset vbnv in cmos when cmos failure occursAaron Durbin
There's an occasional issue on machines which use CMOS for their vbnv storage. The machine that just powers up from complete G3 would have had their RTC rail not held up. The contents of vbnv in CMOS could pass the crc8 though the values could be bad. In order to fix this introduce two functions: 1. vbnv_init_cmos() 2. vbnv_cmos_failed() At the start of vboot the CMOS is queried for failure. If there is a failure indicated then the vbnv data is restored from flash backup or reset to known values when there is no flash backup. BUG=b:63054105 Change-Id: I8bd6f28f64a116b84a08ce4779cd4dc73c0f2f3d Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21560 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2017-09-20vboot: remove init_vbnv_cmos()Aaron Durbin
Instead of having each potential caller deal with the differences of cmos_init() and init_vbnv_cmos() when VBOOT is enabled put the correct logic within the callee, cmos_init(), for handling the vbnv in CMOS. The internal __cmos_init() routine returns when the CMOS area was cleared. BUG=b:63054105 Change-Id: Ia124bcd61d3ac03e899a4ecf3645fc4b7a558f03 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21549 Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2017-01-03vboot: Clear battery cutoff flags when vbnv_cmos loads backup VBNV.Hung-Te Lin
When CONFIG_VBOOT_VBNV_CMOS_BACKUP_TO_FLASH is set, vbnv_cmos will try to load VBNV from flash if the VBNV in CMOS is invalid. This is usually correct, except the case of battery cut-off. CMOS will always be invalid after battery cut-off if there is no RTC battery (or if that is dead). However, in current implementation the backup in flash is only updated in coreboot, while the real battery cutoff (and the clearing of cutoff flags in VBNV) is done in payload (Depthcharge) stage. This will create an endless reboot loop that: 1. crossystem sets battery cutoff flag in VBNV_CMOS then reboot. 2. coreboot backs-up VBNV_CMOS to VBNV_flash. 3. Depthcharge sees cutoff flag in VBNV_CMOS. 4. Depthcharge clears cutoff flag in VBNV_CMOS. 5. Depthcharge performs battery cutoff (CMOS data is lost). 6. (Plug AC adapter) Reboot. 7. Coreboot sees invalid VBNV_CMOS, load backup from VBNV_flash. 8. Jump to 3. As a result, we should always clear battery cutoff flags when loading backups from VBNV_flash. BRANCH=glados,reef BUG=chrome-os-partner:61365,chrome-os-partner:59615 TEST=emerge-reef coreboot bootimage; Change-Id: I3250a3a179a7b0de9c6e401e4a94dcd23920e473 Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/423460 Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18008 Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
2016-07-28vboot: Separate vboot from chromeosFurquan Shaikh
VBOOT_VERIFY_FIRMWARE should be independent of CHROMEOS. This allows use of verified boot library without having to stick to CHROMEOS. BUG=chrome-os-partner:55639 Change-Id: Ia2c328712caedd230ab295b8a613e3c1ed1532d9 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15867 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>