From 269563a423f9291e84b5a93859a3e17767cf27a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Reinauer Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 21:20:22 +0000 Subject: First shot at factoring SMM code into generic parts and southbridge specific parts. This should help to reduce the code duplication for Rudolf's K8/VIA SMM implementation... Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer Acked-by: Joseph Smith git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3870 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1 --- src/cpu/x86/smm/smihandler.c | 203 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 203 insertions(+) create mode 100644 src/cpu/x86/smm/smihandler.c (limited to 'src/cpu/x86/smm/smihandler.c') diff --git a/src/cpu/x86/smm/smihandler.c b/src/cpu/x86/smm/smihandler.c new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..0dc8926653 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/cpu/x86/smm/smihandler.c @@ -0,0 +1,203 @@ +/* + * This file is part of the coreboot project. + * + * Copyright (C) 2008 coresystems GmbH + * + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or + * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as + * published by the Free Software Foundation; version 2 of + * the License. + * + * This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the + * GNU General Public License for more details. + * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License + * along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software + * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, + * MA 02110-1301 USA + */ + +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + +void southbridge_smi_set_eos(void); + +#define DEBUG_SMI + +typedef enum { SMI_LOCKED, SMI_UNLOCKED } smi_semaphore; + +/* SMI multiprocessing semaphore */ +static volatile smi_semaphore smi_handler_status = SMI_UNLOCKED; + +static int smi_obtain_lock(void) +{ + u8 ret = SMI_LOCKED; + + asm volatile ( + "movb %2, %%al\n" + "xchgb %%al, %1\n" + "movb %%al, %0\n" + : "=g" (ret), "=m" (smi_handler_status) + : "g" (SMI_LOCKED) + : "eax" + ); + + return (ret == SMI_UNLOCKED); +} + +static void smi_release_lock(void) +{ + asm volatile ( + "movb %1, %%al\n" + "xchgb %%al, %0\n" + : "=m" (smi_handler_status) + : "g" (SMI_UNLOCKED) + : "eax" + ); +} + +#define LAPIC_ID 0xfee00020 +static inline __attribute__((always_inline)) unsigned long nodeid(void) +{ + return (*((volatile unsigned long *)(LAPIC_ID)) >> 24); +} + +/* ********************* smi_util ************************* */ + +/* Data */ +#define UART_RBR 0x00 +#define UART_TBR 0x00 + +/* Control */ +#define UART_IER 0x01 +#define UART_IIR 0x02 +#define UART_FCR 0x02 +#define UART_LCR 0x03 +#define UART_MCR 0x04 +#define UART_DLL 0x00 +#define UART_DLM 0x01 + +/* Status */ +#define UART_LSR 0x05 +#define UART_MSR 0x06 +#define UART_SCR 0x07 + +static int uart_can_tx_byte(void) +{ + return inb(TTYS0_BASE + UART_LSR) & 0x20; +} + +static void uart_wait_to_tx_byte(void) +{ + while(!uart_can_tx_byte()) + ; +} + +static void uart_wait_until_sent(void) +{ + while(!(inb(TTYS0_BASE + UART_LSR) & 0x40)) + ; +} + +static void uart_tx_byte(unsigned char data) +{ + uart_wait_to_tx_byte(); + outb(data, TTYS0_BASE + UART_TBR); + /* Make certain the data clears the fifos */ + uart_wait_until_sent(); +} + +void console_tx_flush(void) +{ + uart_wait_to_tx_byte(); +} + +void console_tx_byte(unsigned char byte) +{ + if (byte == '\n') + uart_tx_byte('\r'); + uart_tx_byte(byte); +} + +/* ********************* smi_util ************************* */ + + +void io_trap_handler(int smif) +{ + southbridge_io_trap_handler(smif); +} + +/** + * @brief Set the EOS bit + */ +static void smi_set_eos(void) +{ + southbridge_smi_set_eos(); +} + +/** + * @brief Interrupt handler for SMI# + * + * @param smm_revision revision of the smm state save map + */ + +void smi_handler(u32 smm_revision) +{ + u8 reg8; + u16 pmctrl; + u16 pm1_sts; + u32 smi_sts, gpe0_sts, tco_sts; + unsigned int node; + smm_state_save_area_t state_save; + + /* Are we ok to execute the handler? */ + if (!smi_obtain_lock()) + return; + + node=nodeid(); + +#ifdef DEBUG_SMI + console_loglevel = DEFAULT_CONSOLE_LOGLEVEL; +#else + console_loglevel = 1; +#endif + + printk_debug("\nSMI# #%d\n", node); + + switch (smm_revision) { + case 0x00030007: + state_save.type = LEGACY; + state_save.legacy_state_save = (legacy_smm_state_save_area_t *) + (0xa8000 + 0x7e00 - (node * 0x400)); + break; + case 0x00030100: + state_save.type = EM64T; + state_save.em64t_state_save = (em64t_smm_state_save_area_t *) + (0xa8000 + 0x7d00 - (node * 0x400)); + break; + case 0x00030064: + state_save.type = AMD64; + state_save.amd64_state_save = (amd64_smm_state_save_area_t *) + (0xa8000 + 0x7e00 - (node * 0x400)); + break; + default: + printk_debug("smm_revision: 0x%08x\n", smm_revision); + printk_debug("SMI# not supported on your CPU\n"); + /* Don't release lock, so no further SMI will happen, + * if we don't handle it anyways. + */ + return; + } + + southbridge_smi_handler(node, &state_save); + + smi_release_lock(); + + /* De-assert SMI# signal to allow another SMI */ + smi_set_eos(); +} -- cgit v1.2.3