From 0cb07e3476d9408d0935253f9f26c0a8ddc28401 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Martin Roth Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2013 21:46:01 -0600 Subject: include: Fix spelling Change-Id: Iadc813bc8208278996b2b1aa20cfb156ec06fac9 Signed-off-by: Martin Roth Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3755 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer --- src/include/boot/coreboot_tables.h | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/include/boot') diff --git a/src/include/boot/coreboot_tables.h b/src/include/boot/coreboot_tables.h index ee1c29f4c5..87819ce4dc 100644 --- a/src/include/boot/coreboot_tables.h +++ b/src/include/boot/coreboot_tables.h @@ -6,11 +6,11 @@ /* The coreboot table information is for conveying information * from the firmware to the loaded OS image. Primarily this * is expected to be information that cannot be discovered by - * other means, such as quering the hardware directly. + * other means, such as querying the hardware directly. * * All of the information should be Position Independent Data. * That is it should be safe to relocated any of the information - * without it's meaning/correctnes changing. For table that + * without it's meaning/correctness changing. For table that * can reasonably be used on multiple architectures the data * size should be fixed. This should ease the transition between * 32 bit and 64 bit architectures etc. @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ * table entry is required or not. This should remove much of the * long term compatibility burden as table entries which are * irrelevant or have been replaced by better alternatives may be - * dropped. Of course it is polite and expidite to include extra + * dropped. Of course it is polite and expedite to include extra * table entries and be backwards compatible, but it is not required. */ -- cgit v1.2.3