From b297b4901a5e7dd0aa037b184329a0e96722149e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stefan Reinauer Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 01:08:25 +0000 Subject: drop dead uart init code. Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@6523 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1 --- src/include/uart8250.h | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/include') diff --git a/src/include/uart8250.h b/src/include/uart8250.h index 47cc88ed01..3918bf1333 100644 --- a/src/include/uart8250.h +++ b/src/include/uart8250.h @@ -131,11 +131,6 @@ #ifndef __ROMCC__ -// Can't we just drop this? It seems silly. -struct uart8250 { - unsigned int baud; -}; - unsigned char uart8250_rx_byte(unsigned base_port); int uart8250_can_rx_byte(unsigned base_port); void uart8250_tx_byte(unsigned base_port, unsigned char data); @@ -144,7 +139,6 @@ void uart8250_tx_byte(unsigned base_port, unsigned char data); * have three different sets of uart code, so it's an improvement. */ void uart8250_init(unsigned base_port, unsigned divisor); -void init_uart8250(unsigned base_port, struct uart8250 *uart); void uart_init(void); #endif -- cgit v1.2.3