/* 2004.12 yhlu add dual core support */ #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include #include static int disable_siblings = !CONFIG_LOGICAL_CPUS; #include "dualcore_id.c" static int get_max_siblings(int nodes) { device_t dev; int nodeid; int siblings=0; //get max siblings from all the nodes for(nodeid=0; nodeid> 12) & 3; if(siblings < j) { siblings = j; } } return siblings; } static void enable_apic_ext_id(int nodes) { device_t dev; int nodeid; //enable APIC_EXIT_ID all the nodes for(nodeid=0; nodeid>4) & 7) + 1; siblings = get_max_siblings(nodes); if(bsp_apic_id > 0) { // io apic could start from 0 return 0; } else if(pci_read_config32(dev, 0x68) & ( (1<<17) | (1<<18)) ) { // enabled ext id but bsp = 0 return 1; } nb_cfg_54 = read_nb_cfg_54(); #if 0 //it is for all e0 single core and nc_cfg_54 low is set, but in the romstage.c stage we do not set that bit for it. if(nb_cfg_54 && (!disable_siblings) && (siblings == 0)) { //we need to check if e0 single core is there int i; for(i=0; i0) ) { /* for 8 way dual core, we will used up apicid 16:16, actually 16 is not allowed by current kernel and the kernel will try to get one that is small than 16 to make io apic work. I don't know when the kernel can support 256 apic id. (APIC_EXT_ID is enabled) */ //4:10 for two way 8:12 for four way 16:16 for eight way //Use CONFIG_MAX_PHYSICAL_CPUS instead of nodes for better consistency? apicid_base = nb_cfg_54 ? (siblings+1) * nodes : 8 * siblings + nodes; } else { apicid_base = nodes; } if((apicid_base+ioapic_num-1)>0xf) { // We need to enable APIC EXT ID printk(BIOS_INFO, "if the IO APIC device doesn't support 256 apic id, \n you need to set CONFIG_ENABLE_APIC_EXT_ID in romstage.c so you can spare 16 id for ioapic\n"); enable_apic_ext_id(nodes); } return apicid_base; }