diff options
author | Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> | 2016-02-14 08:17:16 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com> | 2016-02-18 05:28:50 +0100 |
commit | 6cc7ada465a7c5a6dab6e32abd5a4b6f1734c1d0 (patch) | |
tree | fa9afb3c705dcdfc6baa8bdba844d4ff78d8ff0f /EmulatorPkg/Include | |
parent | 730ffca1943d8965f68faa55216ba5857635bcd2 (diff) | |
download | edk2-platforms-6cc7ada465a7c5a6dab6e32abd5a4b6f1734c1d0.tar.xz |
BaseTools: LzmaCompress: fix gcc-6 warning "misleading-indentation"
The way the first use of the "_maxMode" variable is commented out (i.e.,
together with the enclosing "if" statement) in GetOptimum() triggers the
"misleading-indentation" warning that is new in gcc-6.0, for the block of
code that originally depended on the "if" statement. Gcc believes
(mistakenly) that the programmer believes (mistakenly) that the block
depends on (repIndex == 0) higher up.
Restore the if statement, with a controlling expression that comprises the
constant 1 and "_maxMode" commented out.
Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Cc: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Cc: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Cc: Yonghong Zhu <yonghong.zhu@intel.com>
Reported-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Suggested-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Build-tested-by: Cole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307439
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.justen@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Liming Gao <liming.gao@intel.com>
Diffstat (limited to 'EmulatorPkg/Include')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions