From 4710c53dcad1ebf3755f3efb9e80ac24bd72a9b2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: darylm503 <darylm503@6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 22:12:42 +0000
Subject: AppPkg/Applications/Python: Add Python 2.7.2 sources since the
 release of Python 2.7.3 made them unavailable from the python.org web site.

These files are a subset of the python-2.7.2.tgz distribution from python.org.  Changed files from PyMod-2.7.2 have been copied into the corresponding directories of this tree, replacing the original files in the distribution.

Signed-off-by: daryl.mcdaniel@intel.com


git-svn-id: https://edk2.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/edk2/trunk/edk2@13197 6f19259b-4bc3-4df7-8a09-765794883524
---
 .../Python-2.7.2/Lib/unittest/test/test_loader.py  | 1286 ++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 1286 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 AppPkg/Applications/Python/Python-2.7.2/Lib/unittest/test/test_loader.py

(limited to 'AppPkg/Applications/Python/Python-2.7.2/Lib/unittest/test/test_loader.py')

diff --git a/AppPkg/Applications/Python/Python-2.7.2/Lib/unittest/test/test_loader.py b/AppPkg/Applications/Python/Python-2.7.2/Lib/unittest/test/test_loader.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..de806edb95
--- /dev/null
+++ b/AppPkg/Applications/Python/Python-2.7.2/Lib/unittest/test/test_loader.py
@@ -0,0 +1,1286 @@
+import sys
+import types
+
+
+import unittest
+
+
+class Test_TestLoader(unittest.TestCase):
+
+    ### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromTestCase
+    ################################################################
+
+    # "Return a suite of all tests cases contained in the TestCase-derived
+    # class testCaseClass"
+    def test_loadTestsFromTestCase(self):
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+            def foo_bar(self): pass
+
+        tests = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')])
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests)
+
+    # "Return a suite of all tests cases contained in the TestCase-derived
+    # class testCaseClass"
+    #
+    # Make sure it does the right thing even if no tests were found
+    def test_loadTestsFromTestCase__no_matches(self):
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def foo_bar(self): pass
+
+        empty_suite = unittest.TestSuite()
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), empty_suite)
+
+    # "Return a suite of all tests cases contained in the TestCase-derived
+    # class testCaseClass"
+    #
+    # What happens if loadTestsFromTestCase() is given an object
+    # that isn't a subclass of TestCase? Specifically, what happens
+    # if testCaseClass is a subclass of TestSuite?
+    #
+    # This is checked for specifically in the code, so we better add a
+    # test for it.
+    def test_loadTestsFromTestCase__TestSuite_subclass(self):
+        class NotATestCase(unittest.TestSuite):
+            pass
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(NotATestCase)
+        except TypeError:
+            pass
+        else:
+            self.fail('Should raise TypeError')
+
+    # "Return a suite of all tests cases contained in the TestCase-derived
+    # class testCaseClass"
+    #
+    # Make sure loadTestsFromTestCase() picks up the default test method
+    # name (as specified by TestCase), even though the method name does
+    # not match the default TestLoader.testMethodPrefix string
+    def test_loadTestsFromTestCase__default_method_name(self):
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def runTest(self):
+                pass
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        # This has to be false for the test to succeed
+        self.assertFalse('runTest'.startswith(loader.testMethodPrefix))
+
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [Foo('runTest')])
+
+    ################################################################
+    ### /Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromTestCase
+
+    ### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromModule
+    ################################################################
+
+    # "This method searches `module` for classes derived from TestCase"
+    def test_loadTestsFromModule__TestCase_subclass(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+        m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+
+        expected = [loader.suiteClass([MyTestCase('test')])]
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), expected)
+
+    # "This method searches `module` for classes derived from TestCase"
+    #
+    # What happens if no tests are found (no TestCase instances)?
+    def test_loadTestsFromModule__no_TestCase_instances(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [])
+
+    # "This method searches `module` for classes derived from TestCase"
+    #
+    # What happens if no tests are found (TestCases instances, but no tests)?
+    def test_loadTestsFromModule__no_TestCase_tests(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            pass
+        m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [loader.suiteClass()])
+
+    # "This method searches `module` for classes derived from TestCase"s
+    #
+    # What happens if loadTestsFromModule() is given something other
+    # than a module?
+    #
+    # XXX Currently, it succeeds anyway. This flexibility
+    # should either be documented or loadTestsFromModule() should
+    # raise a TypeError
+    #
+    # XXX Certain people are using this behaviour. We'll add a test for it
+    def test_loadTestsFromModule__not_a_module(self):
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+
+        class NotAModule(object):
+            test_2 = MyTestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(NotAModule)
+
+        reference = [unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')])]
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), reference)
+
+
+    # Check that loadTestsFromModule honors (or not) a module
+    # with a load_tests function.
+    def test_loadTestsFromModule__load_tests(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+        m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+
+        load_tests_args = []
+        def load_tests(loader, tests, pattern):
+            self.assertIsInstance(tests, unittest.TestSuite)
+            load_tests_args.extend((loader, tests, pattern))
+            return tests
+        m.load_tests = load_tests
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, unittest.TestSuite)
+        self.assertEqual(load_tests_args, [loader, suite, None])
+
+        load_tests_args = []
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m, use_load_tests=False)
+        self.assertEqual(load_tests_args, [])
+
+    def test_loadTestsFromModule__faulty_load_tests(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+
+        def load_tests(loader, tests, pattern):
+            raise TypeError('some failure')
+        m.load_tests = load_tests
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, unittest.TestSuite)
+        self.assertEqual(suite.countTestCases(), 1)
+        test = list(suite)[0]
+
+        self.assertRaisesRegexp(TypeError, "some failure", test.m)
+
+    ################################################################
+    ### /Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromModule()
+
+    ### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromName()
+    ################################################################
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    #
+    # Is ValueError raised in response to an empty name?
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__empty_name(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromName('')
+        except ValueError, e:
+            self.assertEqual(str(e), "Empty module name")
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise ValueError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    #
+    # What happens when the name contains invalid characters?
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__malformed_name(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        # XXX Should this raise ValueError or ImportError?
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromName('abc () //')
+        except ValueError:
+            pass
+        except ImportError:
+            pass
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise ValueError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to a
+    # module"
+    #
+    # What happens when a module by that name can't be found?
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__unknown_module_name(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromName('sdasfasfasdf')
+        except ImportError, e:
+            self.assertEqual(str(e), "No module named sdasfasfasdf")
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise ImportError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    #
+    # What happens when the module is found, but the attribute can't?
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__unknown_attr_name(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromName('unittest.sdasfasfasdf')
+        except AttributeError, e:
+            self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'")
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise AttributeError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    #
+    # What happens when we provide the module, but the attribute can't be
+    # found?
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_unknown_name(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromName('sdasfasfasdf', unittest)
+        except AttributeError, e:
+            self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'")
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise AttributeError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    # ...
+    # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+    #
+    # Does loadTestsFromName raise ValueError when passed an empty
+    # name relative to a provided module?
+    #
+    # XXX Should probably raise a ValueError instead of an AttributeError
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_empty_name(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromName('', unittest)
+        except AttributeError:
+            pass
+        else:
+            self.fail("Failed to raise AttributeError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    # ...
+    # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+    #
+    # What happens when an impossible name is given, relative to the provided
+    # `module`?
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_malformed_name(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        # XXX Should this raise AttributeError or ValueError?
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromName('abc () //', unittest)
+        except ValueError:
+            pass
+        except AttributeError:
+            pass
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise ValueError")
+
+    # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+    #
+    # Does loadTestsFromName raise TypeError when the `module` argument
+    # isn't a module object?
+    #
+    # XXX Accepts the not-a-module object, ignorning the object's type
+    # This should raise an exception or the method name should be changed
+    #
+    # XXX Some people are relying on this, so keep it for now
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_not_a_module(self):
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+
+        class NotAModule(object):
+            test_2 = MyTestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('test_2', NotAModule)
+
+        reference = [MyTestCase('test')]
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), reference)
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    #
+    # Does it raise an exception if the name resolves to an invalid
+    # object?
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_bad_object(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        m.testcase_1 = object()
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromName('testcase_1', m)
+        except TypeError:
+            pass
+        else:
+            self.fail("Should have raised TypeError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may
+    # resolve either to ... a test case class"
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_TestCase_subclass(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+        m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('testcase_1', m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [MyTestCase('test')])
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_TestSuite(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+        m.testsuite = unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')])
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('testsuite', m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [MyTestCase('test')])
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+    # ... a test method within a test case class"
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_testmethod(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+        m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('testcase_1.test', m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [MyTestCase('test')])
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    #
+    # Does loadTestsFromName() raise the proper exception when trying to
+    # resolve "a test method within a test case class" that doesn't exist
+    # for the given name (relative to a provided module)?
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_invalid_testmethod(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+        m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromName('testcase_1.testfoo', m)
+        except AttributeError, e:
+            self.assertEqual(str(e), "type object 'MyTestCase' has no attribute 'testfoo'")
+        else:
+            self.fail("Failed to raise AttributeError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+    # ... a callable object which returns a ... TestSuite instance"
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__callable__TestSuite(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        testcase_1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+        testcase_2 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+        def return_TestSuite():
+            return unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1, testcase_2])
+        m.return_TestSuite = return_TestSuite
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('return_TestSuite', m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [testcase_1, testcase_2])
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+    # ... a callable object which returns a TestCase ... instance"
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__callable__TestCase_instance(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        testcase_1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+        def return_TestCase():
+            return testcase_1
+        m.return_TestCase = return_TestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('return_TestCase', m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [testcase_1])
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+    # ... a callable object which returns a TestCase ... instance"
+    #*****************************************************************
+    #Override the suiteClass attribute to ensure that the suiteClass
+    #attribute is used
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__callable__TestCase_instance_ProperSuiteClass(self):
+        class SubTestSuite(unittest.TestSuite):
+            pass
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        testcase_1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+        def return_TestCase():
+            return testcase_1
+        m.return_TestCase = return_TestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.suiteClass = SubTestSuite
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('return_TestCase', m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [testcase_1])
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+    # ... a test method within a test case class"
+    #*****************************************************************
+    #Override the suiteClass attribute to ensure that the suiteClass
+    #attribute is used
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__relative_testmethod_ProperSuiteClass(self):
+        class SubTestSuite(unittest.TestSuite):
+            pass
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+        m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.suiteClass=SubTestSuite
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromName('testcase_1.test', m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [MyTestCase('test')])
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+    # ... a callable object which returns a TestCase or TestSuite instance"
+    #
+    # What happens if the callable returns something else?
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__callable__wrong_type(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        def return_wrong():
+            return 6
+        m.return_wrong = return_wrong
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromName('return_wrong', m)
+        except TypeError:
+            pass
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise TypeError")
+
+    # "The specifier can refer to modules and packages which have not been
+    # imported; they will be imported as a side-effect"
+    def test_loadTestsFromName__module_not_loaded(self):
+        # We're going to try to load this module as a side-effect, so it
+        # better not be loaded before we try.
+        #
+        module_name = 'unittest.test.dummy'
+        sys.modules.pop(module_name, None)
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        try:
+            suite = loader.loadTestsFromName(module_name)
+
+            self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+            self.assertEqual(list(suite), [])
+
+            # module should now be loaded, thanks to loadTestsFromName()
+            self.assertIn(module_name, sys.modules)
+        finally:
+            if module_name in sys.modules:
+                del sys.modules[module_name]
+
+    ################################################################
+    ### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromName()
+
+    ### Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames()
+    ################################################################
+
+    # "Similar to loadTestsFromName(), but takes a sequence of names rather
+    # than a single name."
+    #
+    # What happens if that sequence of names is empty?
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__empty_name_list(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames([])
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [])
+
+    # "Similar to loadTestsFromName(), but takes a sequence of names rather
+    # than a single name."
+    # ...
+    # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+    #
+    # What happens if that sequence of names is empty?
+    #
+    # XXX Should this raise a ValueError or just return an empty TestSuite?
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_empty_name_list(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames([], unittest)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [])
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    #
+    # Is ValueError raised in response to an empty name?
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__empty_name(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromNames([''])
+        except ValueError, e:
+            self.assertEqual(str(e), "Empty module name")
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise ValueError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    #
+    # What happens when presented with an impossible module name?
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__malformed_name(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        # XXX Should this raise ValueError or ImportError?
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromNames(['abc () //'])
+        except ValueError:
+            pass
+        except ImportError:
+            pass
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise ValueError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    #
+    # What happens when no module can be found for the given name?
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__unknown_module_name(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromNames(['sdasfasfasdf'])
+        except ImportError, e:
+            self.assertEqual(str(e), "No module named sdasfasfasdf")
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise ImportError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    #
+    # What happens when the module can be found, but not the attribute?
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__unknown_attr_name(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromNames(['unittest.sdasfasfasdf', 'unittest'])
+        except AttributeError, e:
+            self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'")
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise AttributeError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    # ...
+    # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+    #
+    # What happens when given an unknown attribute on a specified `module`
+    # argument?
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__unknown_name_relative_1(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromNames(['sdasfasfasdf'], unittest)
+        except AttributeError, e:
+            self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'")
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise AttributeError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    # ...
+    # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+    #
+    # Do unknown attributes (relative to a provided module) still raise an
+    # exception even in the presence of valid attribute names?
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__unknown_name_relative_2(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromNames(['TestCase', 'sdasfasfasdf'], unittest)
+        except AttributeError, e:
+            self.assertEqual(str(e), "'module' object has no attribute 'sdasfasfasdf'")
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromName failed to raise AttributeError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    # ...
+    # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+    #
+    # What happens when faced with the empty string?
+    #
+    # XXX This currently raises AttributeError, though ValueError is probably
+    # more appropriate
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_empty_name(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromNames([''], unittest)
+        except AttributeError:
+            pass
+        else:
+            self.fail("Failed to raise ValueError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    # ...
+    # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+    #
+    # What happens when presented with an impossible attribute name?
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_malformed_name(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        # XXX Should this raise AttributeError or ValueError?
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromNames(['abc () //'], unittest)
+        except AttributeError:
+            pass
+        except ValueError:
+            pass
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise ValueError")
+
+    # "The method optionally resolves name relative to the given module"
+    #
+    # Does loadTestsFromNames() make sure the provided `module` is in fact
+    # a module?
+    #
+    # XXX This validation is currently not done. This flexibility should
+    # either be documented or a TypeError should be raised.
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_not_a_module(self):
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+
+        class NotAModule(object):
+            test_2 = MyTestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['test_2'], NotAModule)
+
+        reference = [unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')])]
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), reference)
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve either to
+    # a module, a test case class, a TestSuite instance, a test method
+    # within a test case class, or a callable object which returns a
+    # TestCase or TestSuite instance."
+    #
+    # Does it raise an exception if the name resolves to an invalid
+    # object?
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_bad_object(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        m.testcase_1 = object()
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testcase_1'], m)
+        except TypeError:
+            pass
+        else:
+            self.fail("Should have raised TypeError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+    # ... a test case class"
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_TestCase_subclass(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+        m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testcase_1'], m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+
+        expected = loader.suiteClass([MyTestCase('test')])
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [expected])
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+    # ... a TestSuite instance"
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_TestSuite(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+        m.testsuite = unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')])
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testsuite'], m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [m.testsuite])
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to ... a
+    # test method within a test case class"
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_testmethod(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+        m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testcase_1.test'], m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+
+        ref_suite = unittest.TestSuite([MyTestCase('test')])
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [ref_suite])
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to ... a
+    # test method within a test case class"
+    #
+    # Does the method gracefully handle names that initially look like they
+    # resolve to "a test method within a test case class" but don't?
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__relative_invalid_testmethod(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class MyTestCase(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+        m.testcase_1 = MyTestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromNames(['testcase_1.testfoo'], m)
+        except AttributeError, e:
+            self.assertEqual(str(e), "type object 'MyTestCase' has no attribute 'testfoo'")
+        else:
+            self.fail("Failed to raise AttributeError")
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+    # ... a callable object which returns a ... TestSuite instance"
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__callable__TestSuite(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        testcase_1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+        testcase_2 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+        def return_TestSuite():
+            return unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1, testcase_2])
+        m.return_TestSuite = return_TestSuite
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['return_TestSuite'], m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+
+        expected = unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1, testcase_2])
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [expected])
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+    # ... a callable object which returns a TestCase ... instance"
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__callable__TestCase_instance(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        testcase_1 = unittest.FunctionTestCase(lambda: None)
+        def return_TestCase():
+            return testcase_1
+        m.return_TestCase = return_TestCase
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['return_TestCase'], m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+
+        ref_suite = unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1])
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [ref_suite])
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+    # ... a callable object which returns a TestCase or TestSuite instance"
+    #
+    # Are staticmethods handled correctly?
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__callable__call_staticmethod(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class Test1(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test(self):
+                pass
+
+        testcase_1 = Test1('test')
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            @staticmethod
+            def foo():
+                return testcase_1
+        m.Foo = Foo
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo.foo'], m)
+        self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+
+        ref_suite = unittest.TestSuite([testcase_1])
+        self.assertEqual(list(suite), [ref_suite])
+
+    # "The specifier name is a ``dotted name'' that may resolve ... to
+    # ... a callable object which returns a TestCase or TestSuite instance"
+    #
+    # What happens when the callable returns something else?
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__callable__wrong_type(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        def return_wrong():
+            return 6
+        m.return_wrong = return_wrong
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        try:
+            loader.loadTestsFromNames(['return_wrong'], m)
+        except TypeError:
+            pass
+        else:
+            self.fail("TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames failed to raise TypeError")
+
+    # "The specifier can refer to modules and packages which have not been
+    # imported; they will be imported as a side-effect"
+    def test_loadTestsFromNames__module_not_loaded(self):
+        # We're going to try to load this module as a side-effect, so it
+        # better not be loaded before we try.
+        #
+        module_name = 'unittest.test.dummy'
+        sys.modules.pop(module_name, None)
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        try:
+            suite = loader.loadTestsFromNames([module_name])
+
+            self.assertIsInstance(suite, loader.suiteClass)
+            self.assertEqual(list(suite), [unittest.TestSuite()])
+
+            # module should now be loaded, thanks to loadTestsFromName()
+            self.assertIn(module_name, sys.modules)
+        finally:
+            if module_name in sys.modules:
+                del sys.modules[module_name]
+
+    ################################################################
+    ### /Tests for TestLoader.loadTestsFromNames()
+
+    ### Tests for TestLoader.getTestCaseNames()
+    ################################################################
+
+    # "Return a sorted sequence of method names found within testCaseClass"
+    #
+    # Test.foobar is defined to make sure getTestCaseNames() respects
+    # loader.testMethodPrefix
+    def test_getTestCaseNames(self):
+        class Test(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+            def foobar(self): pass
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        self.assertEqual(loader.getTestCaseNames(Test), ['test_1', 'test_2'])
+
+    # "Return a sorted sequence of method names found within testCaseClass"
+    #
+    # Does getTestCaseNames() behave appropriately if no tests are found?
+    def test_getTestCaseNames__no_tests(self):
+        class Test(unittest.TestCase):
+            def foobar(self): pass
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        self.assertEqual(loader.getTestCaseNames(Test), [])
+
+    # "Return a sorted sequence of method names found within testCaseClass"
+    #
+    # Are not-TestCases handled gracefully?
+    #
+    # XXX This should raise a TypeError, not return a list
+    #
+    # XXX It's too late in the 2.5 release cycle to fix this, but it should
+    # probably be revisited for 2.6
+    def test_getTestCaseNames__not_a_TestCase(self):
+        class BadCase(int):
+            def test_foo(self):
+                pass
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        names = loader.getTestCaseNames(BadCase)
+
+        self.assertEqual(names, ['test_foo'])
+
+    # "Return a sorted sequence of method names found within testCaseClass"
+    #
+    # Make sure inherited names are handled.
+    #
+    # TestP.foobar is defined to make sure getTestCaseNames() respects
+    # loader.testMethodPrefix
+    def test_getTestCaseNames__inheritance(self):
+        class TestP(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+            def foobar(self): pass
+
+        class TestC(TestP):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_3(self): pass
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+
+        names = ['test_1', 'test_2', 'test_3']
+        self.assertEqual(loader.getTestCaseNames(TestC), names)
+
+    ################################################################
+    ### /Tests for TestLoader.getTestCaseNames()
+
+    ### Tests for TestLoader.testMethodPrefix
+    ################################################################
+
+    # "String giving the prefix of method names which will be interpreted as
+    # test methods"
+    #
+    # Implicit in the documentation is that testMethodPrefix is respected by
+    # all loadTestsFrom* methods.
+    def test_testMethodPrefix__loadTestsFromTestCase(self):
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+            def foo_bar(self): pass
+
+        tests_1 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('foo_bar')])
+        tests_2 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')])
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.testMethodPrefix = 'foo'
+        self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests_1)
+
+        loader.testMethodPrefix = 'test'
+        self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests_2)
+
+    # "String giving the prefix of method names which will be interpreted as
+    # test methods"
+    #
+    # Implicit in the documentation is that testMethodPrefix is respected by
+    # all loadTestsFrom* methods.
+    def test_testMethodPrefix__loadTestsFromModule(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+            def foo_bar(self): pass
+        m.Foo = Foo
+
+        tests_1 = [unittest.TestSuite([Foo('foo_bar')])]
+        tests_2 = [unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')])]
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.testMethodPrefix = 'foo'
+        self.assertEqual(list(loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)), tests_1)
+
+        loader.testMethodPrefix = 'test'
+        self.assertEqual(list(loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)), tests_2)
+
+    # "String giving the prefix of method names which will be interpreted as
+    # test methods"
+    #
+    # Implicit in the documentation is that testMethodPrefix is respected by
+    # all loadTestsFrom* methods.
+    def test_testMethodPrefix__loadTestsFromName(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+            def foo_bar(self): pass
+        m.Foo = Foo
+
+        tests_1 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('foo_bar')])
+        tests_2 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')])
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.testMethodPrefix = 'foo'
+        self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromName('Foo', m), tests_1)
+
+        loader.testMethodPrefix = 'test'
+        self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromName('Foo', m), tests_2)
+
+    # "String giving the prefix of method names which will be interpreted as
+    # test methods"
+    #
+    # Implicit in the documentation is that testMethodPrefix is respected by
+    # all loadTestsFrom* methods.
+    def test_testMethodPrefix__loadTestsFromNames(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+            def foo_bar(self): pass
+        m.Foo = Foo
+
+        tests_1 = unittest.TestSuite([unittest.TestSuite([Foo('foo_bar')])])
+        tests_2 = unittest.TestSuite([Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')])
+        tests_2 = unittest.TestSuite([tests_2])
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.testMethodPrefix = 'foo'
+        self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo'], m), tests_1)
+
+        loader.testMethodPrefix = 'test'
+        self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo'], m), tests_2)
+
+    # "The default value is 'test'"
+    def test_testMethodPrefix__default_value(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        self.assertTrue(loader.testMethodPrefix == 'test')
+
+    ################################################################
+    ### /Tests for TestLoader.testMethodPrefix
+
+    ### Tests for TestLoader.sortTestMethodsUsing
+    ################################################################
+
+    # "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in
+    # getTestCaseNames() and all the loadTestsFromX() methods"
+    def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__loadTestsFromTestCase(self):
+        def reversed_cmp(x, y):
+            return -cmp(x, y)
+
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp
+
+        tests = loader.suiteClass([Foo('test_2'), Foo('test_1')])
+        self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests)
+
+    # "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in
+    # getTestCaseNames() and all the loadTestsFromX() methods"
+    def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__loadTestsFromModule(self):
+        def reversed_cmp(x, y):
+            return -cmp(x, y)
+
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+        m.Foo = Foo
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp
+
+        tests = [loader.suiteClass([Foo('test_2'), Foo('test_1')])]
+        self.assertEqual(list(loader.loadTestsFromModule(m)), tests)
+
+    # "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in
+    # getTestCaseNames() and all the loadTestsFromX() methods"
+    def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__loadTestsFromName(self):
+        def reversed_cmp(x, y):
+            return -cmp(x, y)
+
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+        m.Foo = Foo
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp
+
+        tests = loader.suiteClass([Foo('test_2'), Foo('test_1')])
+        self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromName('Foo', m), tests)
+
+    # "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in
+    # getTestCaseNames() and all the loadTestsFromX() methods"
+    def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__loadTestsFromNames(self):
+        def reversed_cmp(x, y):
+            return -cmp(x, y)
+
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+        m.Foo = Foo
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp
+
+        tests = [loader.suiteClass([Foo('test_2'), Foo('test_1')])]
+        self.assertEqual(list(loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo'], m)), tests)
+
+    # "Function to be used to compare method names when sorting them in
+    # getTestCaseNames()"
+    #
+    # Does it actually affect getTestCaseNames()?
+    def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__getTestCaseNames(self):
+        def reversed_cmp(x, y):
+            return -cmp(x, y)
+
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = reversed_cmp
+
+        test_names = ['test_2', 'test_1']
+        self.assertEqual(loader.getTestCaseNames(Foo), test_names)
+
+    # "The default value is the built-in cmp() function"
+    def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__default_value(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        self.assertTrue(loader.sortTestMethodsUsing is cmp)
+
+    # "it can be set to None to disable the sort."
+    #
+    # XXX How is this different from reassigning cmp? Are the tests returned
+    # in a random order or something? This behaviour should die
+    def test_sortTestMethodsUsing__None(self):
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.sortTestMethodsUsing = None
+
+        test_names = ['test_2', 'test_1']
+        self.assertEqual(set(loader.getTestCaseNames(Foo)), set(test_names))
+
+    ################################################################
+    ### /Tests for TestLoader.sortTestMethodsUsing
+
+    ### Tests for TestLoader.suiteClass
+    ################################################################
+
+    # "Callable object that constructs a test suite from a list of tests."
+    def test_suiteClass__loadTestsFromTestCase(self):
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+            def foo_bar(self): pass
+
+        tests = [Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')]
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.suiteClass = list
+        self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromTestCase(Foo), tests)
+
+    # It is implicit in the documentation for TestLoader.suiteClass that
+    # all TestLoader.loadTestsFrom* methods respect it. Let's make sure
+    def test_suiteClass__loadTestsFromModule(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+            def foo_bar(self): pass
+        m.Foo = Foo
+
+        tests = [[Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')]]
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.suiteClass = list
+        self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromModule(m), tests)
+
+    # It is implicit in the documentation for TestLoader.suiteClass that
+    # all TestLoader.loadTestsFrom* methods respect it. Let's make sure
+    def test_suiteClass__loadTestsFromName(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+            def foo_bar(self): pass
+        m.Foo = Foo
+
+        tests = [Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')]
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.suiteClass = list
+        self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromName('Foo', m), tests)
+
+    # It is implicit in the documentation for TestLoader.suiteClass that
+    # all TestLoader.loadTestsFrom* methods respect it. Let's make sure
+    def test_suiteClass__loadTestsFromNames(self):
+        m = types.ModuleType('m')
+        class Foo(unittest.TestCase):
+            def test_1(self): pass
+            def test_2(self): pass
+            def foo_bar(self): pass
+        m.Foo = Foo
+
+        tests = [[Foo('test_1'), Foo('test_2')]]
+
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        loader.suiteClass = list
+        self.assertEqual(loader.loadTestsFromNames(['Foo'], m), tests)
+
+    # "The default value is the TestSuite class"
+    def test_suiteClass__default_value(self):
+        loader = unittest.TestLoader()
+        self.assertTrue(loader.suiteClass is unittest.TestSuite)
+
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+    unittest.main()
-- 
cgit v1.2.3