summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/free-hardware-designs.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorTong Hui <tonghuix@gmail.com>2016-09-28 19:39:27 +0800
committerTong Hui <tonghuix@gmail.com>2016-09-28 19:39:27 +0800
commit1fa47c2996897834c924801b5fabd5c10052270b (patch)
tree14a39d30110e7be788becfd7785c67cc96c6cb7f /docs/free-hardware-designs.md
parent156cd42ca134edce4d4212fcec0442eaef2e2e16 (diff)
downloadfsfs-zh-1fa47c2996897834c924801b5fabd5c10052270b.tar.xz
add pdf and html support
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/free-hardware-designs.md')
-rw-r--r--docs/free-hardware-designs.md6
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 4 deletions
diff --git a/docs/free-hardware-designs.md b/docs/free-hardware-designs.md
index ee431ef..afe8a99 100644
--- a/docs/free-hardware-designs.md
+++ b/docs/free-hardware-designs.md
@@ -152,15 +152,13 @@
[^freehard-7]: 参见 <http://fsf.org/resources/hw/endorsement>
- [^freehard-8]: Rich Brown, “Pulling Back from Open Source Hardware, MakerBot Angers Some Adherents,” 27 September 2012, [http://cnet.com/news/pulling-back-from-\
-open-source-hardware-makerbot-angers-some-adherents/](http://cnet.com/news/pulling-back-from-%3Cbr%3Eopen-source-hardware-makerbot-angers-some-adherents/).
+ [^freehard-8]: Rich Brown, “Pulling Back from Open Source Hardware, MakerBot Angers Some Adherents,” 27 September 2012, <http://cnet.com/news/pulling-back-from-open-source-hardware-makerbot-angers-some-adherents/>.
[^freehard-9]: 如本文中的用法,“数字硬件”包括在数字部分之外还有模拟部分的硬件。
[^freehard-10]: 参见美国版权局定义的“useful article”,于 <http://copyright.gov/register/va-useful.html>.
- [^freehard-11]: 一篇由 Public Knowledge 所写的文章 (“为你的 3D 打印产物赋予许可的三个步骤” 6 March 2015,[https://publicknowledge.org/assets/uploads/documents/\
-3\_Steps\_for\_Licensing\_Your\_3D\_Printed\_Stuff.pdf](https://publicknowledge.org/assets/uploads/documents/%3Cbr%3E3_Steps_for_Licensing_Your_3D_Printed_Stuff.pdf)) 对其在美国的复杂性给出了很有用的信息,尽管该文落入了使用伪概念“知识产权”,和不应该和版权联用的宣传用语“保护”的常见谬误。若问为何,《应避免使用(或慎用)的词语,由于它们是不公正的或者引起混淆的》一文。
+ [^freehard-11]: 一篇由 Public Knowledge 所写的文章 (“为你的 3D 打印产物赋予许可的三个步骤” 6 March 2015, <https://publicknowledge.org/assets/uploads/documents/3_Steps_for_Licensing_Your_3D_Printed_Stuff.pdf>) 对其在美国的复杂性给出了很有用的信息,尽管该文落入了使用伪概念“知识产权”,和不应该和版权联用的宣传用语“保护”的常见谬误。若问为何,《应避免使用(或慎用)的词语,由于它们是不公正的或者引起混淆的》一文。
[^freehard-12]: 参见《您说过“知识产权”吗?这是一种迷惑性的幻景》一文。