summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/docs/not-ipr.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authornadebula <rliang06@ruc.edu.cn>2016-09-08 00:15:31 +0800
committerGitHub <noreply@github.com>2016-09-08 00:15:31 +0800
commit09907e5d6d97b5b336e08213b43910e5b7aab266 (patch)
tree9add7c0bef58db64d352d366e2c5639106b131a8 /docs/not-ipr.md
parent7ce089f15ba490c80dc0052f6758eeca3472a790 (diff)
downloadfsfs-zh-09907e5d6d97b5b336e08213b43910e5b7aab266.tar.xz
Final update
Translation by Nadebula on Sep. 8th
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/not-ipr.md')
-rw-r--r--docs/not-ipr.md2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/docs/not-ipr.md b/docs/not-ipr.md
index beb93ca..869c3d3 100644
--- a/docs/not-ipr.md
+++ b/docs/not-ipr.md
@@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ and simplistic picture the term “intellectual property” suggests.
Consider each of these issues separately, in its fullness, and you have
a chance of considering them well.
-如果您想要对专利法、版权法、商标法或是其他不同法律所引起的问题进行清晰的思考,第一步就是忘记将它们不分青红皂白地放在一起的想法,并且将它们作为独立的问题区别对待。第二部是拒绝“知识产权”这一概念所提示的狭隘视角和过度简单化的情景。只有对每个问题进行独立且完整的思考,您才能有机会清晰地思考它们。
+如果您想要对专利法、版权法、商标法或是其他不同法律所引起的问题进行清晰的思考,第一步就是忘记将它们不分青红皂白地放在一起的想法,并且将它们作为独立的问题区别对待。第二步是拒绝“知识产权”这一概念所提示的狭隘视角和过度简单化的情景。只有对每个问题进行独立且完整的思考,您才能有机会清晰地思考它们。
### Notes {#notes .subheading}