diff options
author | nadebula <rliang06@ruc.edu.cn> | 2016-09-08 00:15:31 +0800 |
---|---|---|
committer | GitHub <noreply@github.com> | 2016-09-08 00:15:31 +0800 |
commit | 09907e5d6d97b5b336e08213b43910e5b7aab266 (patch) | |
tree | 9add7c0bef58db64d352d366e2c5639106b131a8 /docs/not-ipr.md | |
parent | 7ce089f15ba490c80dc0052f6758eeca3472a790 (diff) | |
download | fsfs-zh-09907e5d6d97b5b336e08213b43910e5b7aab266.tar.xz |
Final update
Translation by Nadebula on Sep. 8th
Diffstat (limited to 'docs/not-ipr.md')
-rw-r--r-- | docs/not-ipr.md | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/docs/not-ipr.md b/docs/not-ipr.md index beb93ca..869c3d3 100644 --- a/docs/not-ipr.md +++ b/docs/not-ipr.md @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ and simplistic picture the term “intellectual property” suggests. Consider each of these issues separately, in its fullness, and you have a chance of considering them well. -如果您想要对专利法、版权法、商标法或是其他不同法律所引起的问题进行清晰的思考,第一步就是忘记将它们不分青红皂白地放在一起的想法,并且将它们作为独立的问题区别对待。第二部是拒绝“知识产权”这一概念所提示的狭隘视角和过度简单化的情景。只有对每个问题进行独立且完整的思考,您才能有机会清晰地思考它们。 +如果您想要对专利法、版权法、商标法或是其他不同法律所引起的问题进行清晰的思考,第一步就是忘记将它们不分青红皂白地放在一起的想法,并且将它们作为独立的问题区别对待。第二步是拒绝“知识产权”这一概念所提示的狭隘视角和过度简单化的情景。只有对每个问题进行独立且完整的思考,您才能有机会清晰地思考它们。 ### Notes {#notes .subheading} |