From 00264ff1b87dc649fbe0fb857f38b9b057437bb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steve Reinhardt <stever@eecs.umich.edu>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:20:02 -0500
Subject: Rename port methods: sendBlockSizeQuery() -> peerBlockSize()
 recvBlockSizeQuery() -> deviceBlockSize() After seeing how this gets used in
 practice, the send/recv*Query names just don't make a lot of sense.

dev/io_device.cc:
mem/port.cc:
    sendBlockSizeQuery() -> peerBlockSize()
mem/port.hh:
    sendBlockSizeQuery() -> peerBlockSize()
    recvBlockSizeQuery() -> deviceBlockSize()

--HG--
extra : convert_revision : e96349fb443979b85899a5248bd7cd8665e23ef0
---
 dev/io_device.cc | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'dev')

diff --git a/dev/io_device.cc b/dev/io_device.cc
index 1ed2a060a..b580c2805 100644
--- a/dev/io_device.cc
+++ b/dev/io_device.cc
@@ -98,7 +98,8 @@ DmaPort::dmaAction(Memory::Command cmd, DmaPort port, Addr addr, int size,
 
     completionEvent = event;
 
-    for (ChunkGenerator gen(addr, size, sendBlockSizeQuery()); !gen.done(); gen.next()) {
+    for (ChunkGenerator gen(addr, size, peerBlockSize());
+         !gen.done(); gen.next()) {
             Packet *pkt = new Packet(basePkt);
             Request *req = new Request(baseReq);
             pkt->addr = gen.addr();
-- 
cgit v1.2.3