From 1b370431d0ac51eb54bfbf17247f935d48995a34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ali Saidi <Ali.Saidi@ARM.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 01:23:08 -0400
Subject: sim: Remove FastAlloc

While FastAlloc provides a small performance increase (~1.5%) over regular malloc it isn't thread safe.
After removing FastAlloc and using tcmalloc I've seen a performance increase of 12% over libc malloc
when running twolf for ARM.
---
 src/cpu/base_dyn_inst.hh | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/cpu/base_dyn_inst.hh')

diff --git a/src/cpu/base_dyn_inst.hh b/src/cpu/base_dyn_inst.hh
index 900a98aa0..a9cb60070 100644
--- a/src/cpu/base_dyn_inst.hh
+++ b/src/cpu/base_dyn_inst.hh
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@
 #include <queue>
 
 #include "arch/utility.hh"
-#include "base/fast_alloc.hh"
 #include "base/trace.hh"
 #include "config/the_isa.hh"
 #include "cpu/checker/cpu.hh"
@@ -73,7 +72,7 @@
  */
 
 template <class Impl>
-class BaseDynInst : public FastAlloc, public RefCounted
+class BaseDynInst : public RefCounted
 {
   public:
     // Typedef for the CPU.
-- 
cgit v1.2.3