From 1b370431d0ac51eb54bfbf17247f935d48995a34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ali Saidi <Ali.Saidi@ARM.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 01:23:08 -0400
Subject: sim: Remove FastAlloc

While FastAlloc provides a small performance increase (~1.5%) over regular malloc it isn't thread safe.
After removing FastAlloc and using tcmalloc I've seen a performance increase of 12% over libc malloc
when running twolf for ARM.
---
 src/cpu/ozone/lw_lsq.hh | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/cpu/ozone')

diff --git a/src/cpu/ozone/lw_lsq.hh b/src/cpu/ozone/lw_lsq.hh
index db8e53b43..855e5a97c 100644
--- a/src/cpu/ozone/lw_lsq.hh
+++ b/src/cpu/ozone/lw_lsq.hh
@@ -37,7 +37,6 @@
 #include <queue>
 
 #include "arch/types.hh"
-#include "base/fast_alloc.hh"
 #include "base/hashmap.hh"
 #include "config/the_isa.hh"
 #include "cpu/inst_seq.hh"
@@ -301,7 +300,7 @@ class OzoneLWLSQ {
     };
 
     /** Derived class to hold any sender state the LSQ needs. */
-    class LSQSenderState : public Packet::SenderState, public FastAlloc
+    class LSQSenderState : public Packet::SenderState
     {
       public:
         /** Default constructor. */
-- 
cgit v1.2.3