From 1b370431d0ac51eb54bfbf17247f935d48995a34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ali Saidi <Ali.Saidi@ARM.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 01:23:08 -0400
Subject: sim: Remove FastAlloc

While FastAlloc provides a small performance increase (~1.5%) over regular malloc it isn't thread safe.
After removing FastAlloc and using tcmalloc I've seen a performance increase of 12% over libc malloc
when running twolf for ARM.
---
 src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.hh | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/cpu/testers/networktest')

diff --git a/src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.hh b/src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.hh
index 8b7a89d6f..aec74a484 100644
--- a/src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.hh
+++ b/src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.hh
@@ -33,7 +33,6 @@
 
 #include <set>
 
-#include "base/fast_alloc.hh"
 #include "base/statistics.hh"
 #include "mem/mem_object.hh"
 #include "mem/port.hh"
@@ -99,7 +98,7 @@ class NetworkTest : public MemObject
 
     CpuPort cachePort;
 
-    class NetworkTestSenderState : public Packet::SenderState, public FastAlloc
+    class NetworkTestSenderState : public Packet::SenderState
     {
       public:
         /** Constructor. */
-- 
cgit v1.2.3