From 1b370431d0ac51eb54bfbf17247f935d48995a34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ali Saidi Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 01:23:08 -0400 Subject: sim: Remove FastAlloc While FastAlloc provides a small performance increase (~1.5%) over regular malloc it isn't thread safe. After removing FastAlloc and using tcmalloc I've seen a performance increase of 12% over libc malloc when running twolf for ARM. --- src/cpu/testers/memtest/memtest.hh | 3 +-- src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.hh | 3 +-- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/cpu/testers') diff --git a/src/cpu/testers/memtest/memtest.hh b/src/cpu/testers/memtest/memtest.hh index 450a3e4f1..52e32d72d 100644 --- a/src/cpu/testers/memtest/memtest.hh +++ b/src/cpu/testers/memtest/memtest.hh @@ -34,7 +34,6 @@ #include -#include "base/fast_alloc.hh" #include "base/statistics.hh" #include "mem/mem_object.hh" #include "mem/port.hh" @@ -112,7 +111,7 @@ class MemTest : public MemObject CpuPort funcPort; PortProxy funcProxy; - class MemTestSenderState : public Packet::SenderState, public FastAlloc + class MemTestSenderState : public Packet::SenderState { public: /** Constructor. */ diff --git a/src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.hh b/src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.hh index 8b7a89d6f..aec74a484 100644 --- a/src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.hh +++ b/src/cpu/testers/networktest/networktest.hh @@ -33,7 +33,6 @@ #include -#include "base/fast_alloc.hh" #include "base/statistics.hh" #include "mem/mem_object.hh" #include "mem/port.hh" @@ -99,7 +98,7 @@ class NetworkTest : public MemObject CpuPort cachePort; - class NetworkTestSenderState : public Packet::SenderState, public FastAlloc + class NetworkTestSenderState : public Packet::SenderState { public: /** Constructor. */ -- cgit v1.2.3