From 1b370431d0ac51eb54bfbf17247f935d48995a34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ali Saidi <Ali.Saidi@ARM.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 01:23:08 -0400
Subject: sim: Remove FastAlloc

While FastAlloc provides a small performance increase (~1.5%) over regular malloc it isn't thread safe.
After removing FastAlloc and using tcmalloc I've seen a performance increase of 12% over libc malloc
when running twolf for ARM.
---
 src/dev/dma_device.hh | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'src/dev')

diff --git a/src/dev/dma_device.hh b/src/dev/dma_device.hh
index 8fc4e664c..8b40cc7e4 100644
--- a/src/dev/dma_device.hh
+++ b/src/dev/dma_device.hh
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
 class DmaPort : public MasterPort
 {
   protected:
-    struct DmaReqState : public Packet::SenderState, public FastAlloc
+    struct DmaReqState : public Packet::SenderState
     {
         /** Event to call on the device when this transaction (all packets)
          * complete. */
-- 
cgit v1.2.3