From 4135dd48ed0e876e11a935240d5436a421db12c6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ron Dreslinski Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 01:12:52 -0500 Subject: Update bus bridges now that snoop ranges are passed properly src/mem/bridge.cc: Update brdiges, now that snoop addresses are properly forwarded. Bus bridge should only handle snoops on the second phase (SNOOP_COMMIT) src/mem/bus.cc: src/mem/bus.hh: Make sure if a busBridge has access to both things that snoop and things that respond it only takes the request once --HG-- extra : convert_revision : 26cc9ee4429be45d4476fa435e0e9a54843c2509 --- src/mem/bridge.cc | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/mem/bridge.cc') diff --git a/src/mem/bridge.cc b/src/mem/bridge.cc index 38dcfd2e8..b787f79ca 100644 --- a/src/mem/bridge.cc +++ b/src/mem/bridge.cc @@ -91,10 +91,16 @@ Bridge::init() bool Bridge::BridgePort::recvTiming(PacketPtr pkt) { - DPRINTF(BusBridge, "recvTiming: src %d dest %d addr 0x%x\n", - pkt->getSrc(), pkt->getDest(), pkt->getAddr()); + if (pkt->flags & SNOOP_COMMIT) { + DPRINTF(BusBridge, "recvTiming: src %d dest %d addr 0x%x\n", + pkt->getSrc(), pkt->getDest(), pkt->getAddr()); - return otherPort->queueForSendTiming(pkt); + return otherPort->queueForSendTiming(pkt); + } + else { + // Else it's just a snoop, properly return if we are blocking + return !queueFull(); + } } -- cgit v1.2.3