From 1c2d5f5e64387527efe495a59f6946e7b539a543 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Steve Reinhardt Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 08:09:24 -0700 Subject: Replace DeferredSnoop flag with LowerMSHRPending flag. Turns out DeferredSnoop isn't quite the right bit of info we needed... see new comment in cache_impl.hh. --HG-- extra : convert_revision : a38de8c1677a37acafb743b7074ef88b21d3b7be --- src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh') diff --git a/src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh b/src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh index c8c1a239c..82410afe1 100644 --- a/src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh +++ b/src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh @@ -754,7 +754,7 @@ Cache::handleResponse(PacketPtr pkt) } else { // response to snoop request DPRINTF(Cache, "processing deferred snoop...\n"); - handleSnoop(target->pkt, blk, true, true); + handleSnoop(target->pkt, blk, true, true, false); } mshr->popTarget(); @@ -917,7 +917,8 @@ Cache::doTimingSupplyResponse(PacketPtr req_pkt, template void Cache::handleSnoop(PacketPtr pkt, BlkType *blk, - bool is_timing, bool is_deferred) + bool is_timing, bool is_deferred, + bool lower_mshr_pending) { assert(pkt->isRequest()); @@ -929,8 +930,8 @@ Cache::handleSnoop(PacketPtr pkt, BlkType *blk, if (is_timing) { Packet *snoopPkt = new Packet(pkt, true); // clear flags snoopPkt->setExpressSnoop(); - if (is_deferred) { - snoopPkt->setDeferredSnoop(); + if (lower_mshr_pending) { + snoopPkt->setLowerMSHRPending(); } snoopPkt->senderState = new ForwardResponseRecord(pkt, this); cpuSidePort->sendTiming(snoopPkt); @@ -1017,8 +1018,19 @@ Cache::snoopTiming(PacketPtr pkt) Addr blk_addr = pkt->getAddr() & ~(Addr(blkSize-1)); MSHR *mshr = mshrQueue.findMatch(blk_addr); - // better not be snooping a request that conflicts with something - // we have outstanding... + + // If a lower cache has an operation on this block pending (not + // yet in service) on the MSHR, then the upper caches need to know + // about it, as this means that the pending operation logically + // succeeds the current snoop. It's not sufficient to record + // whether the MSHR *is* in service, as this misses the window + // where the lower cache has completed the request and the + // response is on its way back up the hierarchy. + bool lower_mshr_pending = + (mshr && (!mshr->inService) || pkt->lowerMSHRPending()); + + // Let the MSHR itself track the snoop and decide whether we want + // to go ahead and do the regular cache snoop if (mshr && mshr->handleSnoop(pkt, order++)) { DPRINTF(Cache, "Deferring snoop on in-service MSHR to blk %x\n", blk_addr); @@ -1063,7 +1075,7 @@ Cache::snoopTiming(PacketPtr pkt) } } - handleSnoop(pkt, blk, true, false); + handleSnoop(pkt, blk, true, false, lower_mshr_pending); } @@ -1078,7 +1090,7 @@ Cache::snoopAtomic(PacketPtr pkt) } BlkType *blk = tags->findBlock(pkt->getAddr()); - handleSnoop(pkt, blk, false, false); + handleSnoop(pkt, blk, false, false, false); return hitLatency; } -- cgit v1.2.3