From 1b370431d0ac51eb54bfbf17247f935d48995a34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ali Saidi <Ali.Saidi@ARM.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 01:23:08 -0400
Subject: sim: Remove FastAlloc

While FastAlloc provides a small performance increase (~1.5%) over regular malloc it isn't thread safe.
After removing FastAlloc and using tcmalloc I've seen a performance increase of 12% over libc malloc
when running twolf for ARM.
---
 src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/mem/cache')

diff --git a/src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh b/src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh
index 3b9bfd35a..942ac59ec 100644
--- a/src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh
+++ b/src/mem/cache/cache_impl.hh
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@
  * Cache definitions.
  */
 
-#include "base/fast_alloc.hh"
 #include "base/misc.hh"
 #include "base/range.hh"
 #include "base/types.hh"
@@ -349,7 +348,7 @@ Cache<TagStore>::access(PacketPtr pkt, BlkType *&blk,
 }
 
 
-class ForwardResponseRecord : public Packet::SenderState, public FastAlloc
+class ForwardResponseRecord : public Packet::SenderState
 {
     Packet::SenderState *prevSenderState;
     PortID prevSrc;
-- 
cgit v1.2.3