From 1b370431d0ac51eb54bfbf17247f935d48995a34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ali Saidi <Ali.Saidi@ARM.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2012 01:23:08 -0400
Subject: sim: Remove FastAlloc

While FastAlloc provides a small performance increase (~1.5%) over regular malloc it isn't thread safe.
After removing FastAlloc and using tcmalloc I've seen a performance increase of 12% over libc malloc
when running twolf for ARM.
---
 src/sim/eventq.hh | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/sim/eventq.hh')

diff --git a/src/sim/eventq.hh b/src/sim/eventq.hh
index e7d088e80..b04b43702 100644
--- a/src/sim/eventq.hh
+++ b/src/sim/eventq.hh
@@ -42,7 +42,6 @@
 #include <iosfwd>
 #include <string>
 
-#include "base/fast_alloc.hh"
 #include "base/flags.hh"
 #include "base/misc.hh"
 #include "base/trace.hh"
@@ -61,7 +60,7 @@ extern EventQueue mainEventQueue;
  *
  * Caution, the order of members is chosen to maximize data packing.
  */
-class Event : public Serializable, public FastAlloc
+class Event : public Serializable
 {
     friend class EventQueue;
 
-- 
cgit v1.2.3