Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
with the old pattern
This patch is related to https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium/+/1b9c5c4dc41956b8c5ab17b9a882adf8a2513768
BUG=402260
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/460383004
|
|
BUG=382988
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/433293002
|
|
BUG=400662
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/445303002
|
|
Added a DEPS file so that bot_update and gclient can automatically check
out dependencies (GYP, V8, ICU, and on Windows, Cygwin).
BUG=375773
R=jam@chromium.org, nodir@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/416663002
|
|
BUG=https://code.google.com/p/pdfium/issues/detail?id=35
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/451483003
|
|
BUG=387774
R=palmer@chromium.org, tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/441503003
|
|
Patterns are managed in CPDF_DocPageData. When
a document is closed, all patterns will be
released in the deconstruction of CPDF_DocPageData.
However, some patterns which are referenced in
CPDF_Color can't get the notification from the
destroy of CPDF_DocPageData. It will cause
use-after-free in CPDF_Color::~CPDF_Color.
BUG=392719
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/439693002
|
|
BUG=387811
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/437483004
|
|
Edge closer to the goal of building PDFium with the chromium_code
configuration.
BUG=https://code.google.com/p/pdfium/issues/detail?id=29
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com, thakis@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/441763002
|
|
of i++
BUG=387979
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/439733002
|
|
When newPos == file size, the current block will not be read or Get. If this block is a crucial part of the document (like m_pTrailer), the program will exit with parse error and
the document will not be rendered.
BUG=None
R=jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/440563003
|
|
BUG=382988
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/430733004
|
|
Patch from jschuh@chromium.org.
BUG=pdfium:31
TBR=jschuh@chromium.org,thakis@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/438843003
|
|
This reverts commit 4923e3cfbc2b617614858c427fa87a8c67aca784.
Since exceptions are in the process of being removed,
and the code currently isn't rollable into pdfium (for other
reasons) I'm going to revert this for now, so that this CL
doesn't become blocking-for-rolls if the other min/max problem
is addressed.
And, hopefully by the time I get back to this it won't be
necessary anyway.
BUG=pdfium:28,pdfium:31,chromium:354261
R=thakis@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/432243002
|
|
Goes with https://codereview.chromium.org/431803003/
R=jam@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:354261
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/426153007
|
|
Added by https://codereview.chromium.org/292313014/ but causes
annoying warnings on Windows. Just don't add CRLFs.
R=jam@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/430043002
|
|
R=jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/417263008
|
|
No intended behavior change.
BUG=pdfium:29
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/436483002
|
|
It's unused, and it caused a warning about CPDFSDK_Widget::ResetAppearance()
failing to override it (since these two unrelated methods had the same name).
No intended behavior change.
BUG=pdfium:29
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/429483004
|
|
When an image object is zoomed in by a big factor, the scaling factor in the transformation matrix is big as well, resulting in a large |dest_width| and |dest_height| value(they can be think of as the equivalent pixel size of the entire image, although most of it is outside the device).
BUG=395636
R=vitalybuka@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/432543002
|
|
BUG=387854
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/372453005
|
|
No intended behavior change.
BUG=pdfium:29
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/426763003
|
|
BUG=pdfium:29
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/427353003
|
|
No intended behavior change.
BUG=pdfium:29
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/426763004
|
|
BUG=391929
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/419693003
|
|
There are many warnings that look like:
error: 'CPWL_RadioButton::OnChar' hides overloaded virtual function [-Werror,-Woverloaded-virtual]
virtual FX_BOOL OnChar(FX_WORD nChar);
^
note: hidden overloaded virtual function 'CPWL_Wnd::OnChar' declared here: different number of parameters (2 vs 1)
virtual FX_BOOL OnChar(FX_WORD nChar, FX_DWORD nFlag);
^
It looks like someone added the nFlag parameter to the methods in CPWL_Wnd
at some point and missed to update all overloads This patch attempts to fix this:
It adds the parameter to all methods that look like they're trying to overload the base
class method, and renames the method in one case where it fairly clearly looks like
that it's not supposed to be an overload.
BUG=pdfium:29
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/416383004
|
|
fsdk_baseform.h:63:19: error: 'CPDFSDK_Widget::GetLayoutOrder' hides overloaded virtual function [-Werror,-Woverloaded-virtual]
virtual int GetLayoutOrder() {return 2;}
^
fsdk_baseannot.h:70:18: note: hidden overloaded virtual function 'CPDFSDK_Annot::GetLayoutOrder' declared here: different qualifiers (const vs none)
virtual int GetLayoutOrder() const { return 5; }
^
On Windows, I believe MSVS treats these as override since it's such a common and
easy mistake, but clang and gcc do what the standard specifies. Add a "const" to
the function in the subclass so that this is actually an override, as intended.
BUG=pdfium:29
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/427173002
|
|
fpdfview.cpp
BUG=397258
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/419063002
|
|
If somehow different length values could be obtained by two successive calls
to Doc_getFilePath() (and FieldBrowse() for that matter), and the method is
true to the API documentation that says "The return value always indicated
number of bytes required for the buffer, even when there is no buffer
specified, or the buffer size is less then required", then it is possible
to get a returned length describing memory beyond the current buffer.
We can make the corresponding JS_docGetFilePath() method more robust against
this case by applying better checks to the returned value.
This probably is unrelated since ASAN seems to be flagging the corresponding bug
as UAF, but doesn't hurt to make things more robust.
BUG=392956
R=jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/423233002
|
|
BUG=None
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/420793004
|
|
Follow-up from https://codereview.chromium.org/424883002/
- Remove some stray whitespace.
- Fix "else after return".
- Remove unused swResponse local.
- Treat unexpectedly large responses as errors.
BUG=
R=jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/423953002
|
|
No intended behavior change.
- Remove more unused variables, functions, member variables.
- Put a few constructor initializers in the order they execute in.
- Add braces for subobject initializers.
- Fix a handful of signed / unsigned comparisons.
BUG=pdfium:29
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/429593005
|
|
Found by clang's -Wunused-variable, -Wunused-function, -Wunused-const-variable.
BUG=none
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/404653005
|
|
The methods are only defined in the cpp and thus can't always be inlined,
the methods are virtual and so can only be inlined when the concrete type
is known, and inline functions need their definition available in all
translation units.
So just remove the 'inline'.
BUG=none
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/409253004
|
|
BUG=pdfium:19
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/403163002
|
|
BUG=382667
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/322333002
|
|
The |nGrowBy| argument to |SetSize| was always -1, which caused the
effective m_nGrowBy value to always be its default value: 0. So it was not
needed, and was cluttering up the logic.
BUG=384662
Check for integer overflow in CFX_BasicArray.
BUG=384662
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com, rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/415803002
|
|
BUG=384662
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com, rsesek@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/411033003
|
|
Since the land of https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium/+/3522876d5291922ddc62bf1b70d02743b0850673, memory is assured to be 16 byte aligned. So no need to do this check.
Plus, the removed code was causing bug in M36: https://code.google.com/p/pdfium/issues/detail?id=27.
BUG=None
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/418563002
|
|
BUG=pdfium:26
TBR=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/418463002
|
|
BUG=395266
R=jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/411713003
|
|
BUG=396255
R=jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/407243003
|
|
BUG=179413
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/410073002
|
|
BUG=179413
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/408403002
|
|
BUG=None
R=thakis@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/396173003
|
|
Follow-up to https://codereview.chromium.org/370853002/
BUG=none
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/406683005
|
|
This should be set consistently on all platforms. Ideally, we wouldn't
need exceptions, but for now they're used.
BUG=none (noticed while looking at chromium:82385)
R=jam@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/404803005
|
|
BUG=382667
R=jschuh@chromium.org, jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/390983007
|
|
The function is looking ahead N characters at both its "format" and "value"
strings without validating that accesses are in bounds. Add those validations.
There are also duplicate checks in the else-branches which re-test the inverse
of the if-branch. These are removed for simplicity.
I also tidied some stray whitespace in the function while I was at it.
BUG=393831
R=jun_fang@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/395303004
|
|
BUG=pdfium_23
R=palmer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/399233002
|