Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
BUG=pdfium:603
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2392603004
|
|
BUG=pdfium:603
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2386423004
|
|
BUG=pdfium:603
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2392773003
|
|
BUG=pdfium:603
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2386263003
|
|
id:120001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/2375343004/ )
Reason for revert:
Broke PDFExtensionTest when rolling DEPS in Chromium.
Original issue's description:
> Assert that only 0-numbered objects are Released()
>
> This condition holds because numbered objects are brute-force
> deleted by the indirect object holder, rather than being
> released.
>
> Be careful about recursive deletion, check before advancing,
> since we no longer count on Release() doing this for us.
> Fix a few tests where the test was violating ownership rules.
>
> This should be the last step before completely removing Release()
> in favor of direct delete everywhere.
>
> Committed: https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium/+/aba528a362248a54b27a7e9e046e2b65ab83f624
TBR=tsepez@chromium.org
# Skipping CQ checks because original CL landed less than 1 days ago.
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2387193003
|
|
This condition holds because numbered objects are brute-force
deleted by the indirect object holder, rather than being
released.
Be careful about recursive deletion, check before advancing,
since we no longer count on Release() doing this for us.
Fix a few tests where the test was violating ownership rules.
This should be the last step before completely removing Release()
in favor of direct delete everywhere.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2375343004
|
|
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2386273004
|
|
|Clear| is too easily mistaken for "clear this pointer only."
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2385303002
|
|
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2386433002
|
|
Restore CPDF_Dictionary default constructor.
Use it in places where reasonable in the code.
TBR=dsinclair@chromium.org
TBR=thestig@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2383843002
|
|
BUG=pdfium:611
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2377393002
|
|
BUG=pdfium:611
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2382723003
|
|
BUG=pdfium:611
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2381063002
|
|
BUG=pdfium:611
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2374383003
|
|
BUG=pdfium:611
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2376153004
|
|
BUG=pdfium:611
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2383543002
|
|
BUG=pdfium:611
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2379033002
|
|
BUG=pdfium:611
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2375283003
|
|
BUG=pdfium:611
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2381863003
|
|
BUG=pdfium:611
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2374413002
|
|
And fix a typo.
TBR=tsepez@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2382443004
|
|
BUG=pdfium:597
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2345063002
|
|
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2357173005
|
|
The change at 5b7c9bb differed from the original code in
that a pre-existing object would now be freed, which showed
that a collision could be possible if m_LastObjNum overflowed.
BUG=649206
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2361303002
|
|
BUG=648935,649436
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2360283004
|
|
Also, it's idempotent, so simplify some logic in callers to
not care if objnum is zero.
The alternate forms are rarely used, using the objnum form
makes it clear that SetReferenceFor() can't possibly register
the object as a side-effect.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2361713002
|
|
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2353383002
|
|
We remove the indirect object holder argument and check that
call sites pass ownable objects, adding a reference in one
place that always was passing an indirect object.
Also check that the invariant isn't violated, we need to fail
here in the wild and investigate -- these are existing UAFs.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2355083002
|
|
Remove CPDF_Creator and CPDF_Parser as friends of CPDF_Document. Move all
member variables to the private section, and add CPDF_TestDocument as a
private friend.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2349353003
|
|
Remove friendship as there doesn't appear to be anything protected that is
being accessed by CPDF_OCContext.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2355823002
|
|
Remove the friendship between these two classes and replace with accessor
methods.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2355813002
|
|
This CL renames and cleans up some methods that are similar between
CPDF_Document and CPDFXFA_Document.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2351673004
|
|
This reverts commit 81e1e3fd2d33478733e47bd007b76fac1a663e74.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2353013003
|
|
Upon indirect object holder destruction, all indirect
objects are destroyed -- currently by order of increasing
object number -- but ideally without ordering constraints.
So currently, we can get away with a dictionary pointing
directly at an indirect object with a higher number. It
gets destroyed first, invoking Release() on its subordinates,
which skips destroying them if they are indirect objects. But
we don't want to rely on this artifact of destruction
order. Should it happen to be reversed, the dictionary
would invoke Release() on freed memory.
Interestingly, CPDF_Array skirts the issue by replacing
any indirect objects it is given with references. Not
clear whether we should do the same thing for dictionaries,
or remove it from arrays. The technique certainly
complicates understanding ownership.
The one violation found is in the unittest that broke the
previous CL which tried to use unique_ptrs in indirect
object holder.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2353093002
|
|
After this CL: only one global CFX_FontCache used. Any cached items
from it, are released, when they are not being used.
This is restore part of reverted CL:
Original CL: https://codereview.chromium.org/2158023002
Revert reason: BUG=647612
Fix bug CL: https://codereview.chromium.org/2350193003
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2350243002
|
|
This reverts commit c8544d634a1993e2592e41458be215fcd0956031.
TBR=dsinclair@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/2355683002 .
|
|
The objects it is given are owned by it and are simply
deleted without regard to Release() used by others.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2350263002
|
|
We can delete this just fine on our own.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2355593002
|
|
Replace the CPDF_Stream(nullptr, 0, nullptr) pattern with
a default ctor.
Remove unused parameters from CPDF_Stream::SetData(). Both
are always passed as FALSE.
CPDF_Stream declared its own m_GenNum, which shadowed the one
in CPDF_Object. It was used only to distinguish file/memory
streams, so add a bool explicitly for this purpose.
Remove the union, it would be sad if we confused user data
with a C++ object with virtual function calls.
Use unique_ptrs with appropriate deleters to manage memory.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2347993002
|
|
https://codereview.chromium.org/2158023002/ )
Reason for revert:
Causes heap-use-after-free. See crbug.com/647612.
Original issue's description:
> Fix memory leaking on ClosePage.
> CFX_FontCache refactoring:
> after this CL: Only one global CFX_FontCache used. Any cached items from it, are released, when its are not used.
>
> BUG=79367,48791
>
> The fonts was not cleared after unloading pages.
>
> Test pdf:
>
> http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/750614main_NASA_FY_2014_Budget_Estimates-508.pdf
>
> For this file, we have ~5 fonts per page, which equal ~1 Mb per page.
> In this PDF we have 670 pages, as result after slow scrolling(reading) full document we have ~600 Mb fonts data in memory.
>
> memory usage of PDF Plugin:
> before this CL: ~660 Mb
> after this CL: ~100 Mb
>
> Committed: https://pdfium.googlesource.com/pdfium/+/cde5101eb15b24519e89fa500fe37038bc8e2201
TBR=tsepez@chromium.org,brucedawson@chromium.org,npm@chromium.org,art-snake@yandex-team.ru
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=79367,48791
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2350763002
|
|
PWL_FontMap does not need its own charset definitions. fx_edit.h does
not need to define DEFAULT_CHARSET. XFA have their own definitions.
They look different in that most are MAC or MSWin charset definitions.
So they are left untouched. public/fpdf_sysfontinfo.h duplicate ones
were left untouched due to being in public folder.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2347313002
|
|
ProcessbCJK and CalculateFontDesc methods are used to reduce the code
duplication between AddFont and AddWindowsFont methods.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2341373003
|
|
CFX_FontCache refactoring:
after this CL: Only one global CFX_FontCache used. Any cached items from it, are released, when its are not used.
BUG=79367,48791
The fonts was not cleared after unloading pages.
Test pdf:
http://www.nasa.gov/pdf/750614main_NASA_FY_2014_Budget_Estimates-508.pdf
For this file, we have ~5 fonts per page, which equal ~1 Mb per page.
In this PDF we have 670 pages, as result after slow scrolling(reading) full document we have ~600 Mb fonts data in memory.
memory usage of PDF Plugin:
before this CL: ~660 Mb
after this CL: ~100 Mb
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2158023002
|
|
This Cl makes the Get and Set methods consistenly use {G|S}et<Type>For.
BUG=pdfium:596
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2334323005
|
|
- Methods GetPagesDict, ProcessNonbCJK, CalculateFlags, and
CalculateEncodingDict created to reduce duplicated code.
- Code nits
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2323793003
|
|
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2323933002
|
|
Fix up callers from CPDF_DataAvail.
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2294383003
|
|
Return false instead of crashing.
BUG=641882
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2300903002
|
|
BUG=637119
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2305443003
|
|
BUG=642655
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2298753003
|