Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
They are only implemented in one way, and the layering does not
required an interface here.
Change-Id: Id87591ca237fb66dbfc5aa62b4cc11c2464f5ffa
Reviewed-on: https://pdfium-review.googlesource.com/4496
Commit-Queue: dsinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: dsinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I96e0a20d66b9184d22f64d8e4ce0dadd5a78c1e8
Reviewed-on: https://pdfium-review.googlesource.com/2967
Commit-Queue: dsinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Sepez <tsepez@chromium.org>
|
|
The one step to make an actual concrete class is conditionalized
in fpdfview and is unconditional in the fuzzer.
Also replace the clumsy C-style callbacks with a delegate
interface as long as we are making new interfaces.
Change-Id: I733a437483ce5e0c34211cfbbda05105336f55b5
Reviewed-on: https://pdfium-review.googlesource.com/2887
Commit-Queue: Tom Sepez <tsepez@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: dsinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: dsinclair <dsinclair@chromium.org>
|
|
This is something we'd like to try for initial XFA launches
adding in codecs as justified by results in the wild.
Adding statistics for the unsupported cases is a follow-up
exercise once this builds correctly.
We always build all the additional libraries, to allow
fuzzers to link against them even if we are not shipping
them. The linker will sort it out for the actual code.
Rename some files to match the classes contained within.
That the existing tests seem to pass with the codecs
disabled warrants further investigation.
Change-Id: Iad269db91289f12dc9f5dda8f48121d27a0c4367
Reviewed-on: https://pdfium-review.googlesource.com/2836
Commit-Queue: Tom Sepez <tsepez@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Lei Zhang <thestig@chromium.org>
|
|
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2477443002
|
|
BUG=pdfium:611
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2382723003
|
|
All of the ICodec_* interfaces had a single implementation. This CL removes
the interfaces and uses the concrete classes in their place.
BUG=pdfium:468
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1876023003
|