Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This reverts commit ff46aaf499edcf153ee2f57c7016587aa96dcfa0.
TBR=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1255293002 .
|
|
Try to reland this patch after fixing underlying issues that
caused it to be reverted.
fx_system.h is the only manual edit.
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1258093002 .
|
|
This reverts commit 320b2313d19869333ed453af546e61a9fc2b81c9.
Reason for revert: build failure.
TBR=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1255693002 .
|
|
Fully automatic change, execpt for cleanup in fx_system.h
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1254703002 .
|
|
Extracted from https://codereview.chromium.org/1252613002/
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1253603002 .
|
|
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1249643003 .
|
|
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1181593003.
|
|
A virtual method that does |delete this| is an anti-pattern.
Some classes can be de-virtualized instead.
Throw in some unique_ptrs and delete dead code for good measure.
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1192013002.
|
|
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1176333002.
|
|
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1177973008.
|
|
These stand for const CFX_{Byte,Wide}StringC&, which is just
monumentally confusing, since there are so many string types
running around here.
The following had manual changes:
core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_edit/fpdf_edit_content.cpp
core/src/fpdfapi/fpdf_render/fpdf_render_loadimage.cpp
core/src/fpdfdoc/doc_form.cpp
fpdfsdk/src/fpdf_ext.cpp
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1180593004.
|
|
This involves fixing some multiple variable per line
declarations, as the textually-substituted "*" applies
only to the first one.
This involves moving some consts around following the
substitution.
This involves replacing some typedefs used as constructors
with better code.
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1171733003
|
|
Get rid of leading _CAPITAL identifiers.
A large number of these didn't actually match the filename.
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1160443004
|
|
Tiny bit of tidying I noticed while trying to figure out include rules.
In other words,
cd core/include
git grep 'include.*include'
git grep 'include.*src'
Should produce no output, and
cd fpdfsdk/include
git grep 'include.*include' | grep -v ../core/include
git grep 'include.*src'
Should produce no output as well.
Fix some IWYU, header guards, include ordering, whitespace along the way.
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1162453003
|
|
CFX_Object is a type that implements its own new operators that return
NULL on error. There's no need for this given the |new (std::nothrow)|
syntax; in fact, the current code can only work if there is no activity
in the constructors. This may explain the pervasive lack of
constructors and reliance on Init() methods throughout the codebase.
The activity takes place in fx_memory.h, where FX_NEW is mapped onto
the std::nothrow syntax. The rest is just cleanup.
Down the road, we will simply throw and remove all the error-checking
paths for new objects. Landing this patch first will at least show a
simple path back to the old behaviour without having to re-introduce
CFX_Object should someone want to do so in their own fork.
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1088733002
|
|
This is done by explicitly adding a virtual dtor to interface classes,
since the cost is small given that there are already virtual functions.
The exceptions are for classes that have a Release() or Delete() method,
in which case it is non-virtual and protected to indicate that the virtual
class is never the deletion point.
BUG=
R=brucedawson@chromium.org, thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/810883005
|
|
Calling `delete` on an object of a type that has virtual functions but
not a virtual destructor is questionable: Since the object has virtual functions,
it likely has subclasses, so if it's deleted through the base pointer and the
destructor isn't virtual, the subclass destructor won't be called.
In most cases, the classes getting deleted can just be marked final to tell
the compiler that it can't possibly have subclasses (this also enables the
compiler to generate better code).
Two classes didn't have any sub- or superclasses but virtual functions -
this doesn't make sense, so make all methods of these classes non-virtual.
(Also delete an unused function on one of the two classes.)
In one case, a class actually did have a subclass that needs to be deleted
virtually, so mark one destructor as virtual.
BUG=none
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/370853002
|
|
|
|
|