Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1176333002.
(cherry picked from commit 0ef0de55657db8a83372ad8eb22d84c5893afc4c)
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1195943005.
|
|
Required fixing xfa-specific code.
Original Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1192013002.
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1176413004.
|
|
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1180333002.
|
|
Nearly automatic merge + re-run script on new files.
Original Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1180593004.
TBR=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1174303002.
|
|
Original Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1171733003
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1178613002.
|
|
Near-automatic merge, plus re-running scripts to update
additional usage.
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1172793002
|
|
Original Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1160443004
TBR=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1162013003
|
|
Original Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1162453003
TBR=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1154613005
|
|
Original Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1142713005
R=thestig@chromium.org
TBR=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1143663008
|
|
Original Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1129433002
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1122903002
|
|
Original Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1103343002
R=brucedawson@chromium.org
TBR=brucedawson@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1105253002
|
|
BUG=N/A
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1092993002
|
|
This fix is for covering more scenarios. Some faces like Foxit defined faces and MM faces are managed in built-in manager. They are released in built-in manager not in fontMgr.
BUG=452793
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1095733003
|
|
Not just a simple merge, but changes to remove CFX_Object from XFA.
Original Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1088733002
TBR=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1087053002
|
|
b3a788e Fix GN PDFium build when building all. by John Abd-El-Malek - 19 hours ago chromium/2293
f8af677 Always use the FreeType headers included in PDFium. by John Abd-El-Malek - 24 hours ago
dc8c950 Don't export any OpenJPEG methods from PDFium. by John Abd-El-Malek - 3 days ago
71c24b8 Use system FreeType on Linux. by John Abd-El-Malek - 3 days ago
R=tsepez@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/900433002
|
|
Original at URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/810883005
Note that the new code in XFA introduces many more of these, to be handled
separately.
TBR=brucedawson@chromium.org
TBR=thestig@chromium.org
BUG=https://code.google.com/p/pdfium/issues/detail?id=102
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/842223004
|
|
Update freetype to 2.5.4.
Put freetype into third_party directory, cleaning up header files.
Previously freetype header files are in core/src/fxge/freetype and core/include/thirdparties. There were also multiple fx_freetype.h.
This patch removes the additional Foxit wrapper to make further update easier.
Notice, for original freetype source code, the following files are modified and need to be updated accordingly in future update:
third_party/freetype/include/config/ftmodule.h
third_party/freetype/include/config/ftoption.h
BUG=407341
R=thestig@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/815103002
|
|
|
|
You can get warning when using FXARGB_GETDIB() with & operation in
the same statement like: FXARGB_GETDIB(src_scan) & 0xffffff in
fx_dib_composite.cpp:
../../third_party/pdfium/core/src/fxge/dib/fx_dib_composite.cpp:737:205:
error: '&' within '|' [-Werror,-Wbitwise-op-parentheses]
Original patch from jiangj@opera.com
R=thakis@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/578253002
|
|
Calling `delete` on an object of a type that has virtual functions but
not a virtual destructor is questionable: Since the object has virtual functions,
it likely has subclasses, so if it's deleted through the base pointer and the
destructor isn't virtual, the subclass destructor won't be called.
In most cases, the classes getting deleted can just be marked final to tell
the compiler that it can't possibly have subclasses (this also enables the
compiler to generate better code).
Two classes didn't have any sub- or superclasses but virtual functions -
this doesn't make sense, so make all methods of these classes non-virtual.
(Also delete an unused function on one of the two classes.)
In one case, a class actually did have a subclass that needs to be deleted
virtually, so mark one destructor as virtual.
BUG=none
R=bo_xu@foxitsoftware.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/370853002
|
|
|
|
|